No registrations found.
ID
Source
Brief title
Health condition
clubfoot / relapse clubfoot
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Maximum plantar flexion at toe-off obtained with 3DGA during walking
Secondary outcome
Secondary parameters from the gait analysis are kinematics and kinetics from the foot, ankle, knee and hip during functional activities, and muscle activity. Other secondary parameters are the total and/or sub-scores obtained with the questionnaire on perceived motor competence, CAP, PEM-CY, M-ABC 2 checklist and test.
Background summary
Rationale:
Relapse after good initial correction of the clubfoot still occurs in clubfoot patients treated with the Ponseti method. Relapse of the clubfoot results in differences in foot function of the patients and could therefore also pose problems during daily life activities and participation. However, little is known about the difficulties in activity and participation of clubfoot patients and whether gait impairments can predict or illustrate those difficulties. It is hypothesized that (relapse) clubfoot patients show reduction in participation, lower motor ability and larger deficits in movement patterns during dynamic tasks compared to typically developing children.
Objective:
To investigate the differences in participation, activity and function based on dynamic tasks between clubfoot patients with and without relapse and healthy controls. Study design: Observational study with two measurements of approximately 90 and 60 minutes. In the first measurement, three-dimensional gait analysis (3DGA) is done and the child is asked to qive their ooinion about several activities usinq the questionnaire on perceived motor competence. In the second measurement, the movement assessment battery for children 2 (M-ABC 2) and clubfoot assessment protocol (CAP) are performed. Furthermore, parents are asked to fill (approximately 30 min) in the M-ABC 2 checklist and the particioation and environment measure children and vouth (PEM-CY) online. The relapse group will undergo a similar assessment after treatment.
Study population:
30 healthy children, 30 clubfoot patients without a relapse and 30 clubfoot patients with a relapse between the age of 5-9.
Intervention: NA
Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study parameters for participation and motor abilities are the mean PEM-CY and M-ABC 2 scores of the different study groups. The main study parameters for the function are the kinetic and kinematic parameters with special focus on the Oxford foot model (OFM) angles.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:
The first measurement where the 3DGA is done, will be performed by a qualified researcher. It is expected that patients will not undergo any risks or hindrance during this measurement, but parents and children will spend approximately 90 minutes for the first measurement session, 60 minutes for the second measurement session and 30 minutes for the online questionnaire. Considering the new environment and circumstances of the measurement, children could get tired after the measurement. Furthermore, the second measurement session will not be planned on the same day as the first measurement session, and therefore the participant and parent will have to come back at another time. Also, participation in the study will not automatically result in advantage for the child. To gather normative data for comparison with data from the patient population, it is necessary to include healthy children in this study because the not affected side in unilaterally affected clubfoot patients cannot be considered normal.
Study objective
It is hypothesized that (relapse) clubfoot patients show reduction in participation, lower motor ability and larger deficits in movement patterns during dynamic tasks compared to typically developing children.
Study design
The first measurement session will consist of 3DGA. The second measurement session will be max 4 weeks after session 1. In the second sesson assessment of the CAP and M-ABC 2 test will be performed by an experienced physiotherapist. The questionnaires that are used in this study are the PEM-CY and M-ABC 2 checklist for parents and the questionnaire on perceived motor competence for children.
Inclusion criteria
Both controls and (relapse) clubfoot patients who:
- Are 5 - 9 years old
- Have parents with sufficient command of the Dutch language
(Relapse) Clubfoot patients who:
- Have idiopathic clubfoot
- Are uni- or bilaterally affected
- Have been primarily treated with the Ponseti method
Relapse clubfoot patients:
- Reoccurrence of one or more clubfoot aspects that requires additional
treatment as judged by the expert opinion of the treating orthopaedic
surgeon. Additional treatment according to regular care includes:
• Non-invasive treatment with physiotherapy,
• Surgical treatment, consisting of a period of bracing followed by
one of the following surgical procedures: a tibialis anterior
tendon transfer (TATT), anterior distal tibial epiphysiodesis (8-
plate), or a combination of both procedures.
Exclusion criteria
Both controls and (relapse) clubfoot patients who:
- Are unable to follow the instructions
- Have obesity
- Have an underlying syndrome
- Have a neurological disease
Controls who:
- Have problems of the lower extremity
(e.g., hip dysplasia/ broken leg <1year prior to participation)
All clubfoot patients who:
- Did not have their primary treatment in the Netherlands
- Previously received additional surgical treatment (with exception of re-Achilles tendon tenotomy) for a relapse of their clubfoot.
Design
Recruitment
IPD sharing statement
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
NTR-new | NL9593 |
Other | METC MMC : W21.015 |