No registrations found.
ID
Source
Brief title
Health condition
Autism, Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASDs), Classroom Pivotal Response Teaching (CPRT), staff training
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
1. Number of teacher-created opportunities (based on observational data (event recording) from videotapes)
2. Number of occurrences of targeted communication skills (based on observational data (event recording) from videotapes)
Secondary outcome
1. Maladaptive child behaviours (based on observational data (interval recording) from video-tapes and teachers’ ratings (adaptation of planned activity check)
Background summary
Until now, only a few studies investigated the implementation of Pivotal Response Treatment (i.e., Classroom Pivotal Response Teaching) in a school setting (Robinson, 2011; Stahmer et al., 2015; Suhrheinrich, 2007; Suhrheinrich, 2011; Suhrheinrich, 2015) and evidence for improved child outcomes is limited (Koegel, Singh & Koegel, 2010; Robinson, 2010). Therefore, purpose of the present study is (1) to investigate the effectiveness of teacher training in Classroom Pivotal Response Teaching (CPRT) on teacher-created opportunities, (2) to investigate the effectiveness of CPRT on children's communication skills and maladaptive behaviours, and (3) to investigate the maintenance of these skills over a three-month period. A concurrent multiple baseline design is used to investigate the effectiveness of a CPRT-training for teachers. Participants are 6 teachers and 6 children with ASD. Teachers participate in training in CPRT, consisting of 3 2-hour duo training sessions and 2-6 30-minute individual coaching sessions. Coaching sessions continue until teachers demonstrated fidelity of implementation in two consecutive sessions with a maximum of 6 sessions. Training components include instruction, video modelling, practice (e.g. worksheets, role-plays and CPRT-sessions in the classroom) and video-feedback. Data are collected using video-recordings (learning opportunities, communication skills and maladaptive behaviours) and teacher ratings (maladaptive behaviours). Data-analysis includes visual analysis and statistical analyses (e.g., Taunovlap or Tau-U).
Study objective
The purpose of this study is:
1. To investigate the effectiveness of teacher training in Classroom Pivotal Response Teaching (CPRT) on teacher-created opportunities
2. To investigate the effectiveness of CPRT on children's communication skills and maladaptive behaviours.
3. To investigate the maintenance of these skills over a three-month period.
Study design
After examination of the inclusion criteria (using SRS, standardised IQ tests, and pre-baseline observations of communication skills and maladaptive behaviours), the outcome measures are administered at the following time points:
1. Baseline (3-6 weeks):
• 6/9/12 10-minute baseline sessions, during which the teacher gives instruction in reading, spelling or mathematics to a small group of students(N ≤ 5), including the student that participates in the study. These sessions are videotaped.
• 6/9/12 teacher ratings of maladaptive child behaviour
2. Intervention (8-12 weeks):
• 10-minute sessions, during which the teacher gives instruction in reading, spelling or mathematics to a small group of students (N ≤ 5), including the student that participates in the study, and during which the teacher practices the CPRT-components. One or two sessions per week are videotaped
• 2 teacher ratings of maladaptive child behaviour per week
3. Post-intervention (3 weeks)
• 6 10-minute post-intervention sessions, during which the teacher gives instruction in reading, spelling or mathematics to a small group of students (N ≤ 5), including the student that participates in the study, and during which the teacher implements the CPRT-components. These sessions are videotaped.
• 6 teacher ratings of maladaptive child behaviour
4. Follow-up (2 weeks, 3 months after post-intervention)
• 4 10-minute follow-up sessions, during which the teacher gives instruction in reading, spelling or mathematics to a small group of students (N ≤ 5), including the student that participates in the study, and during which the teacher implements the CPRT-components. These sessions are videotaped.
• 4 teacher ratings of maladaptive child behaviour
Intervention
CPRT-training for teachers: 3 2-hour duo training sessions and 2-6 30-minute individual coaching sessions. Coaching sessions continue until a teacher has demonstrated fidelity of implementation in two consecutive sessions with a maximum of 6 sessions. Training components include instruction, video modelling, practice (e.g. worksheets, role-plays and CPRT-sessions in the classroom) and video-feedback.
Rianne Verschuur
Antwoordnummer 15
Oosterbeek 6860 VB
The Netherlands
r.verschuur@leokannerhuis.nl
Rianne Verschuur
Antwoordnummer 15
Oosterbeek 6860 VB
The Netherlands
r.verschuur@leokannerhuis.nl
Inclusion criteria
Teachers need to meet the following inclusion criteria:
1. working at a school for special (primary) education around Arnhem
2. at least 3 years teaching experience
3. teaching at least one child that meets the inclusion criteria for children
Children have to meet the following inclusion criteria:
1. a diagnosis of ASD, confirmed by the SRS
2. a verbal or performance IQ above 80 on a standardized IQ test
3. aged between 6;0 and 12;11 at the start of the study
4. an individual education plan goal focused on communication
5. demonstrating maladaptive behaviour in the classroom
6. having a teacher who participates in this study
Exclusion criteria
Teachers are excluded if they had experience with (C)PRT prior to this study. Children are excluded if they (1) have a diagnosis of language disorder, (2) received PRT-training or participated in PRT-research prior to this study, or (3) start speech therapy or social skills training during data collection.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
NTR-new | NL5886 |
NTR-old | NTR6112 |
Other | Ethiek Commissie Sociale Wetenschappen van de Radboud Universiteit. : EC2013-1304-100a |