No registrations found.
ID
Source
Health condition
knee and hip arthroplasty
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Primary Objective: To identify the most efficient and safe clinical pathways for knee and hip arthroplasty
Secondary outcome
Secondary Objective(s): Do CPs for hip and knee arthroplasty provide financial benefit? Costs are only included if they are listed properly and carefully. Also other postoperative complications, relevant to the question, will be summarized.
Background summary
While the number of these surgeries worldwide is increasing, CPs have been developed to improve efficiency and decrease hospital stay3,6,14 The LOS depends apart from the clinical outcome and patients’ comorbidity, on social and marital status and cultural aspects. Even the health insurances may have influence.3 The LOS has reduced significantly by the use of CPs.13 Nowadays, an outpatient surgery (OS) pathway with possible discharge on the day of surgery has been developed reducing the LOS to one day.7,14 With the OS the patient stays in the hospital for one day only; it is a day care surgery with a day procedure, a patients-specific approach, an optimized process in which the proactive patient is essential. Admission and discharge are on the day of surgery, without an overnight hospital stay.11 This reduction of LOS might satisfy the patient 7,14 as he is able to return home on the same day.
Therefore, the effects of CPs and the decreasing LOS in terms of (serious) adverse events ((S)AE), readmission, functional recovery and PROMS have to be investigated. It should also take into account the long waiting lists and the increasing economic burden on the public health system
Study objective
Numbers of hip and knee arthroplasties are increasing worldwide. The optimization of the treatment and the scientifically supported procedures are implemented in clinical pathways (CPs). CPs have developed during the past decades and this systematic review (SR) with planned meta-analysis (MA) evaluates the efficiency and safety of various care pathways for knee and hip arthroplasty.
Study design
n.a.
Intervention
The general objective is to perform a systematic review and to summarize the available literature regarding the efficiency and safety of clinical pathways for patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty.
M.J.L.F. Heymans
department Zuyderland Academy
Heerlen
The Netherlands
M.J.L.F. Heymans
department Zuyderland Academy
Heerlen
The Netherlands
Inclusion criteria
• Studies including patients of 18 years or older undergoing implantation of a hip or knee prosthesis;
• Studies which compare the intervention with standard care.
Exclusion criteria
• Studies including patients undergoing revision arthroplasty;
• Strictly descriptive articles, e.g. historical articles.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
| Register | ID |
|---|---|
| NTR-new | NL5769 |
| NTR-old | NTR5923 |
| Other | : METC: 16N103 |