No registrations found.
ID
Source
Brief title
Health condition
Surgery; laparoscopic surgery; colorectal cancer.
Chirurgie; laparoscopicsche chirurgie; colorectaal carcinoom
Sponsors and support
Olympus, the Netherlands
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Availability of information according to predefined checklists
Secondary outcome
Surgical characteristics
• Type of surgical procedure
• Laparoscopic, open or converted surgery
• Surgery duration in minutes
• Hand sewn of stapled anastomosis
• Type of anastomosis
• Perforation during surgery
• Blood loss in ml
• Amount of blood transfusions necessary
• Intra-operative surgical complications
• Intra-operative anesthetic complication
• Intra-operative medical complication
• Drain placement
• Stoma yes/no
Pathological characteristics
• Pathology Benign/pre-malignant/Malignant
• Proximal resection margin in mm
• Quality of TME resection
• Tumor size in cm
• In case of second tumor: Benign/pre-malignant/Malignant
• In case of second tumor: Proximal resection margin in mm
• In case of second tumor: Quality of TME resection
• In case of second tumor: Tumor size in cm
• Total number of lymph nodes
• Number of positive lymph nodes
• Pathological Tumor stage
• Pathological Nodal stage
• In case of second tumor: Pathological Tumor stage
• In case of second tumor: Pathological Nodal stage
• Pathological Metastasis stage
Postoperative characteristics
• Postoperative morbidity or mortality ≤30days according to the Clavien Dindo calssification
• Postoperatie wound infection
• Postoperative intra-abdominal abcess
• Postoperative urinary tract infection
• Postoperative respiratory tract infection
• Postoperative cardiological complication
• Postoperative neurological complication
• Postoperative thrombosis (DVT/PE)
• Postoperative Ileus
• Time until first bowel movement (days)
• Postoperative bleeding
• Anastomotic leakage
• Time of postoperative stay in hospital
• Readmittance ≤30days postop
• Oncological recurrance
Background summary
To evaluate the added value of peroperative video recording to the traditional written operative report in providing objective and more complete documentation of surgical procedures, systematic video recording is applied to patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery.
Study objective
The use of peroperative video recording increases the amount of accessible information concerning the surgical procedure and improves surgical quality due to the systematic approach of the procedure
Study design
Up to 30 days postoperative.
Intervention
Video recording of fragments of given surgical procedures according to predefined checklists
F.W. van de Graaf
s Gravendijkwal 230
Rotterdam 3015 CE
The Netherlands
+3110-7038812
f.vandegraaf@erasmusmc.nl
F.W. van de Graaf
s Gravendijkwal 230
Rotterdam 3015 CE
The Netherlands
+3110-7038812
f.vandegraaf@erasmusmc.nl
Inclusion criteria
- Patients aged 18 or older
- Elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection (right hemicolectomy, transverse colectomy, left hemicolectomy, sigmoid colectomy or anterior resection)
Exclusion criteria
- Incomplete medical record
- Patient aged under 18 years old
- Unresectable tumor
- Incomplete video recording
Design
Recruitment
IPD sharing statement
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
NTR-new | NL6368 |
NTR-old | NTR6552 |
Other | METC Erasmus MC : MEC-2012-344 |
Summary results
Imaging for Quality Control: Comparison of Systematic Video Recording to the
Operative Note in Colorectal Cancer Surgery. A Pilot Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016
Dec;23(Suppl 5):798-803. Epub 2016 Sep 22. Erratum in: Ann Surg Oncol. 2016
Dec;23 (Suppl 5):1065. PubMed PMID: 27660256; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5149562.