No registrations found.
ID
Source
Brief title
Health condition
Colorectal cancer
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Relative difference of PSPDR between e-learning group and control group over follow-up period of one year and two years.
Secondary outcome
Correlation of PSPDR and baseline characteristics
Background summary
Our research group has recently completed a large prospective non-randomized trial in the Netherlands, in which a substantial improvement of SP detection was observed among endoscopists within colonoscopies performed in the setting of Dutch FIT-based CRC screening program following a face-to-face training of 45 minutes, which was repeated after three years. In this study, endoscopists from 9 different hospitals located throughout the Netherlands were invited to receive this face-to-face training in 2014 and 2017. The training consisted of a Powerpoint based presentation in which we primarily aimed to educate endoscopists about the importance of SPs in the development of sporadic CRC and PCCRC. In addition, we included a detailed section about the endoscopic appearance of SPs using the well-established WASP classification for optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps. The proximal serrated polyp detection rate (PSPDR) of the endoscopists that received these face-to-face trainings steadily increased from 9.3% at baseline to 15.4% at the end of follow-up in 2018. We compared this with the PSPDR of a random group of 100 untrained endoscopists located throughout the Netherlands. In this control group, the PSPDR remained stable around 10% throughout the entire follow-up duration. The results of this study are promising and demonstrate that endoscopists can be easily trained for long lasting increase in SP detection. It is not known, however, whether this training could also be delivered as an e-learning instead of a face-to-face training session, which would greatly simplify implementation.
The effectivity of e-learning in endoscopy has been scarcely studied, although some smaller studies demonstrated beneficial effects of online training modules for optical diagnosis of gastric lesions. (2, 3) In education of surgeons however, a recent systematic review demonstrated that elearning was at least as effective in training surgical knowledge, psychomotor skills and nontechnical skills compared to other methods of training such as face-to-face training. Important notice: the major group participating were students or surgical-trainees, not trained surgeons. (4) In addition, our group has recently demonstrated that nationwide implementation of an e-learning for pathologists resulted in long lasting improvement of diagnostic accuracy for histopathologic assessment of serrated polyps.(5)
Based on this evidence, we expect that an e-learning will be similarly effective in improving serrated polyp detection in endoscopy compared to the face-to-face training which we applied in our previous study.
The content of the face-to-face training from our previous study will be used as foundation for the development of a new e-learning module.
Study objective
Proximal serrated polyp detection rate is higher in endoscopists group who were trained by the e-learning.
Study design
From baseline till 2 years of follow-up
Intervention
E-learning focused on detecting serrated polyps and distinguishing from adenoma's.
Inclusion criteria
Accreditated endoscopists performing within the FIT-based Dutch screening program for colorectal cancer.
Exclusion criteria
Endoscopist employed by participating centers of the previous study.
Design
Recruitment
IPD sharing statement
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
NTR-new | NL8385 |
Other | METC AMC : W20_070#20.098 (decision: non-WMO; no formal ethical approval required) |