No registrations found.
ID
Source
Brief title
Health condition
Cryo strip
VSM
GSV
Klassieke strip
Venous
Venous surgery
Veneus
Classic strip
Great saphenous vein
Vene saphena magna
Sponsors and support
performers: T.M.A.L. Klem / M. Schnater / A. van Oers / C.H.A. Wittens / R. Schutte
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Recurrence, confirmed by venous duplex.
Secondary outcome
1. Operation time;
2. Neurological damage after surgery;
3. Quality of life.
Background summary
In this trial we compare cryo strip versus classic strip of the great saphenous vein. Primary outcome is recurrence rate, conformed by venous duplex.
Study objective
Recurrence rate of cryo strip is the same as classic strip of the great saphenous vein.
Study design
N/A
Intervention
Cryo strip of the great saphenous vein versus classic strip of the great saphnous vein.
Berglustlaan 44a
Rotterdam 3054BJ
The Netherlands
t.klem@wxs.nl
Berglustlaan 44a
Rotterdam 3054BJ
The Netherlands
t.klem@wxs.nl
Inclusion criteria
1. Patients with primary varicosis and incompetence of the great saphenous vein and saphenofemoral junction (confirmed by duplex). Only patients with C2, C3, C4 varicosis (CEAP-classification).
Exclusion criteria
1. C5, C6 varicosis;
2. Extreme adipositas (BMI>40);
3. Deep venous occlusion;
4. Incompetence of the small saphenous vein;
5. Aarterial occlusive disease of the legs;
6. Inability to understand the Dutch language;
7. Recurrence of varicosis of the leg.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
| Register | ID |
|---|---|
| NTR-new | NL902 |
| NTR-old | NTR926 |
| Other | : |
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN61851091 |