No registrations found.
ID
Source
Health condition
Dissociative Identity Disorder
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Dissociative symptoms (DSS), presence of DID (SCID-D), dropout
Secondary outcome
trait dissociative symptoms (MID), PTSD symptoms (PSS-SR), daily functioning (WHODAS), schema mode scores (SMI), treatment progress rated by therapist (PITQ), metamemory
Background summary
Patients suffering from Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) were found to have the highest psychiatric treatment costs among patients receiving medical care. There are no consensus treatment guidelines for dissociative disorders and current clinical practice entails lengthy treatment with a high dropout rate. In the current proposal, the efficacy of an alternative treatment for DID (i.e., schema therapy) is tested. Due to the rarity of the disorder and the lengthy treatment of these patients, a case series experimental approach will be used (non-concurrent multiple baseline design). Ten DID outpatients will be included from several community mental health institutes in the Netherlands. A process-measure of dissociative symptoms will be included as index of change. Additionally, various pre-, post-, and follow-up measures will be included encompassing an assessment of the presence of DID, trait dissociative symptoms, comorbid symptomatology, and global symptomatic distress.
Study objective
Investigate the efficacy of schema therapy in Dissociative Identity Disorder
Study design
Multicenter, non-concurrent multiple baseline design. Patients are randomly assigned to one of the predetermined baseline lengths. Baseline observations are carried out, and after an education phase, the treatment is implemented.
Timepoints: Process measure weekly during baseline and education phase, pther measures before and after baseline period, after education phase, each 6 months during intervention, at the end of the intervention and at follow up (six months after the end of treatment).
Additional baseline measures SCID I and II, CTQ.
An additional follow-up assessment will be included one year after the end of treatment (i.e., 6 months after the end of the booster sessions).
Intervention
Treatment will consist of two individual sessions a week during the first two years, followed by one individual session a week during the third year, with each session lasting 50 minutes. The treatment will be theoretically consistent with the model described in Young, Klosko, and Weishaar (2003), which was expanded for the treatment of BPD patients (van Genderen & Arntz 2010; Farrell & Shaw, 2012), and adapted for the specific treatment needs of DID patients (Farrell & Shaw, 2013).
Six monthly booster sessions will be included after the end of treatment.
University of Groningen
Grote Kruisstraat 2/1
R.J.C. Huntjens
Groningen 9712 TS
The Netherlands
050-3636764
r.j.c.huntjens@rug.nl
University of Groningen
Grote Kruisstraat 2/1
R.J.C. Huntjens
Groningen 9712 TS
The Netherlands
050-3636764
r.j.c.huntjens@rug.nl
Inclusion criteria
1) Main diagnosis of DID
2) Age between 18 and 60
3) Dutch literacy
4) Stable use of medication
Exclusion criteria
1) Mental retardation (IQ < 80)
2) Drug/alcohol dependency
3) Acute suïcide risk
4) Florid psychotic episodes
Design
Recruitment
IPD sharing statement
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
NTR-new | NL4356 |
NTR-old | NTR4496 |
Other | Ethische Toetsingscommissie RUG ppo-013-110 : METC UMCG Groningen METc 2013/420 |