The objectives of this study are:* To determine the percentage of patients with recent-onset RA and UA who achieve and maintain clinical remission on treatment with a combination of methotrexate 25 mg/week and extended prednisone pulse (tapered high…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Autoimmune disorders
- Joint disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
1. The percentage of patients achieving remission after 4 months and after 1
year of combination therapy, defined as a DAS < 1.6
After 4 months: with the combination therapy methotrexate and prednisone
After 1 year: after randomization into the combination therapy with either
prednisone or adalimumab.
2. Functional capacity, measured by the health assessment questionaire (HAQ)
after 1 year
3. Radiological joint damage: absolute and progression from baseline, measured
by the modified Sharp/van der Heijde score.
Secondary outcome
- MACTAR questionnaire
- Short Form 36 questionnaire
- EuroQol questionnaire
- Time Trade Off technique
- costs
- ACR painful and swollen joint count
- Patient measures, via visual analog scale (VAS)
pain, morning stiffness, disease activity, general health
- laboratory measurements: chemical (kidney and liver function), hematological
(leucocytes, thrombocytes, hemoglobine), parameters of inflammation (C-reactive
protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate), bone markers, genetic factors
Background summary
During the last decades a dramatic change has taken place in the way rheumatoid
arthritis (RA) patients are treated. Disease modifying antirheumatic drugs
(DMARDs) are prescribed earlier in the disease course and often in combinations
with or without prednisone or a tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blocking agent.
Frequent assessments, for instance using the Disease Activity Score (DAS), can
be used to adjust the medication in order to achieve optimal suppression of the
disease process, regardless of the therapeutic strategy used. For patients with
recently established RA, these changes have resulted in earlier suppression of
disease activity, earlier improvement in functional ability and less
radiological joint damage, without more side effects. Moreover, with these
novel insights in treatment strategies clinical remission appears to be a goal
within the reach of many patients.
In order to start treatment as early as possible, it has been argued to start
treatment even before the diagnosis of RA is made. Undifferentiated arthritis
(UA), defined as an inflammatory arthritis in which no definitive diagnosis can
be made, has been shown to progress to RA within 1 year in 6 to 55 % of cases,
dependent on the UA criteria used, with similar clinical and radiological
outcome as patients that presented with RA. Recently, the PROMPT-study showed
that treatment of UA patients with MTX monotherapy for one year postponed the
progression to RA and retarded radiographic progression during treatment. After
discontinuation of MTX, however, disease activity increased and patients still
progressed to RA, defined by fulfilling the criteria of the American College of
Rheumatology (ACR). It appears that if a window of opportunity exists in UA, in
which by temporary treatment the course of the disease can be fundamentally
altered, MTX monotherapy is not the treatment to rely on. Since combination
therapy is the superior therapy in established RA, initial combination therapy
aiming at clinical remission may also be the best choice for patients with
recent-onset UA.
Current knowledge suggests that combination therapies including prednisone or a
TNF-blocking agent with MTX as the anchor drug are most effective in
suppressing disease activity, reducing radiological damage and functional
disability and can even induce clinical remission in recent-onset RA. Even
short-term use of combination therapy can lead to long-term benefits. However,
there is still no systematic approach to the treatment of patients with
recent-onset arthritis. A head-to-head comparison of DMARD combination therapy
including prednisone and DMARD combination therapy including a TNF-blocking
agent could provide insight into which treatment is superior in efficacy and
cost-effectiveness with the most acceptable toxicity profile.
Therefore, we designed a randomized clinical trial to compare two combination
therapies, including prednisone or a TNF-blocking agent, in recent-onset
arthritis (UA and RA) patients aiming at clinical remission: the
IMPROVED-study: Induction therapy with Methotrexate and Prednisone in
Rheumatoid Or Very Early arthritic Disease. After the same initial treatment
with MTX and a tapered high dose of prednisone, the two different treatment
strategies will allow a comparison of efficacy, safety and cost effectiveness
of early treatment with a combination of MTX, SSZ, HCQ and low dose prednisone
(MSHP), versus treatment with a combination of MTX with the TNF-blocking agent
adalimumab.
Study objective
The objectives of this study are:
* To determine the percentage of patients with recent-onset RA and UA who
achieve and maintain clinical remission on treatment with a combination of
methotrexate 25 mg/week and extended prednisone pulse (tapered high dose) after
4 months.
* To determine whether, if clinical remission is not achieved,
methotrexate+prednisone combination therapy should be extended with
sulphasalazine and hydroxychloroquine or switched to methotrexate+adalimumab
combination therapy.
Study design
This protocol describes a multicentre, randomized, single-blinded one-year
follow-up clinical trial comparing two combination therapies in patients with
recent-onset arthritis (UA and RA) aiming at clinical remission.
In an initial open parallel prospective desing all patients will receive an
initial combination therapy with MTX and tapered high dose prednisone. Patients
who do not achieve clinical remission after 4 months, defined as a disease
activity score (DAS) of <1.6, will subsequently be randomized into two
treatment arms.
1. Extended medication, adding hydroxychloroquine and sulphasalazine while
methotrexate and low dose prednisone are continued.
2. Switching to adalimumab and discontinuation of prednisone, while
methotrexate is continued.
Intervention
1) The initial combination therapy includes methotrexate building up to 25
mg/day and prednisone pulse therapy starting with 60 mg/day and tapering to 7,5
mg/day in 7 weeks. Subsequently, methotrexate will be continued in a dose of 25
mg/day and prednisone in a dose of 7,5 mg/day for 4 months.
2) After 4 months, patients who did not achieve remission according to a DAS <
1.6 will be randomized into two different treatment groups:
A) Extended combination therapy with:
methotrexate 25 mg/day
prednisone 7,5 mg/day
sulfasalazine 2000 mg/day
hydroxychloroquine 400 mg/day
B) Switching therapy to:
methotrexaat 25 mg/dag
adalimumab injection subcutaneously 40 mg every other week
Study burden and risks
The burden for the patients associated with participation include systematic
physical joint examination, questionnaires, blood samples and X-rays of hands
and feet every four months for 1 year. At start and after 1 year a DEXA scan
and extra blood samples. At start screening for tuberculosis and hepatitis B,
consisting of lung X-ray, skin test and serology.
Possible risks to the patient are mainly associated with the toxicity of the
drugs used in both treatment arms:
- increased risk for tuberculosis or reactivation of hepatitis B infection
- increased risk for virus, bacteria and other infections
- skin injection reaction with erythema, itching
- allergic reactions including headache, nausea, dizziness, palpitations and
breathing problems
- possible increased risk for lymphoma
- central nervous system symtoms like tintling, muscle ache or stiffness
More general adverse events:
- gastrointestinal: nausea, vomiting, stomache ache
- huid: rash, stomatitis
- bloed: decrease in leucocytes
- liver function disturbances
- kidney function disturbances
- visus disturbances
- hypertension and hyperglycemia
Combination therapies as the ones used in this study, did not show more
toxicity than the single drugs in prior studies, with a comparable or higher
efficacy. Moreover, next to a direct expected beneficial effect for the
patients included,
this study will provide important scientific information for the amelioration
of treatment strategies for patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis in
the future.
Albinusdreef 2
2300 RC Leiden
NL
Albinusdreef 2
2300 RC Leiden
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
1. minimum age of 18 years
2. at least one swollen joint
3. at least one other painful joint
4. symptom duration shorter than 2 years
5. diagnosis rheumatoid arthritis according to the ACR classification criteria or
6. diagnosis undifferentiated arthritis, suspected for rheumatoid arthritis by the rheumatologist, as no classification criteria exist.
7. patients naive for treatment with corticosteroids or disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs).
Exclusion criteria
1. previous therapy with DMARDs or with corticosteroids (exception: one dose of parenteral corticosteroids within the last 6 months, but not within the last 2 months, or an oral dose of prednisone of =<10 mg/day for =< 2 weeks within the same period allowed).
2. pregnancy or wish to become pregnant during the study, or childbearing potential without adequate contraception
3. concomitant treatment with another experimental drug
4. history or presence of malignancy within the last five years
5. bone marrow hypoplasia
6. elevated hepatic enzyme levels (ASAT, ALAT > 3 times normal value)
7. serum creatinine level > 150 umol/l or estimated creatinine clearance of < 75%
8. uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (according to the rheumatologist)
9. uncontrolled hypertension or moderate to severe heart failure (NYHA class III/IV)
10. alcohol or drug abuse
11. history of infected joint prothesis within the previous 3 months
12. serious infections, such as hepatitis, pneumonia, pyelonephritis in the previous 3 months
13. chronic infectious disease such as chronic renal infection, chronic chest infection with bronchiectasis or sinusitis
14. history of active tuberculosis requiring treatment within previous 3 years, or signs and symptoms of latent infection with tuberculosis, based on medical history, physical examination, tuberculin (PPD) skin test or chest radiograph (see 9.3.1).
15. history of other granulomatous infections as histoplasmosis or coccidiomycosis
16. evidence of active cytomegalovirus, active pneumocystis carinii, active aspergillosis, or drug resistant atypical mycobacterium infection
17. history of opportunistic infections such as herpes zoster within previous 2 months.
18. history of active hepatitis B infection or evidence of a latent infection (see 9.3.1).
19. documented HIV infection, AIDS related complex (ARC) or AIDS.
20. history of lymphoproliferative disease including lymphoma or signs suggestive of possible lymphoproliferative disease.
21. Multiple sclerosis or neurological symptoms suspect for demyelinising disease.
22. Hypersensitivity to human immunoglobuline or other constituents of adalimumab
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EudraCT | EUCTR2006-006186-16-NL |
CCMO | NL15233.058.06 |
Other | volgt |