To compare the development of sensory specific satiety for sweetness after consumption of energy containing and low energy soft drinks. Moreover, we investigate whether SSS depends on the method of administration / oral processing, which influences…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
Synonym
Health condition
geen aandoening
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The difference in the development of SSS, measured as the decrease in
palatability ratings of the test foods from before to after consumption minus
the decrease in palatability of other non-eaten foods, between the sucrose
lemonade and the artificially sweetened lemonade, and between administration of
the lemonades with small swallows and administration with large swallows.
Secondary outcome
n.a.
Background summary
Scientific literature proposes that oral sensory stimulation rather than energy
content provides sensory specific satiety (SSS) for sweetness. Therefore, we
suggest that energy containing soft drinks do not produce more SSS than low
energy soft drinks.
Study objective
To compare the development of sensory specific satiety for sweetness after
consumption of energy containing and low energy soft drinks. Moreover, we
investigate whether SSS depends on the method of administration / oral
processing, which influences the sensory stimulation.
Study design
The study is a randomized, crossover, intervention study, in which the
development of SSS of two test lemonades will be tested. For each of the
lemonades, development of SSS will be tested with two different administration
conditions (administration in large swallows, low oral sensory stimulation, and
administration in small swallows, high oral sensory stimulation, respectively).
For the subjects, the four sessions take place on separate test days, separated
by at least 48 hrs.
Intervention
Each subject participates in 4 sessions. Each session, subjects taste and rate
a small sample of 3 liquid foods and rate the palatability. Next, the subject
will consume an ad libitum amount of one of the foods (test lemonade), either
administered with large or with small swallows. Time for consumption will be
fixed (10 min.). Subsequently the subject will again taste and rate a small
sample of the same 3 foods. Ad libitum consumption volume will be recorded.
The test foods are orange flavoured lemonades, similar in taste. The one is
sweetened with sucrose (10%), the other with artificial sweeteners. The
sweetness of the lemonades is matched.
Study burden and risks
The intervention is non-therapeutic to the subject. The risk associated with
participation is negligible and the burden can be considered as minimal.
Subjects first fill in a questionnaire at home. Next, subjects have to come to
the research centre four times, during which they have to taste several
products (commercially available or exclusively containing ingredients that are
suitable for human consumption) fill in short questionnaires, and consume one
of the products until pleasantly satisfied. Subjects will sign informed consent
upon participation.
Postbus 8129
6700 EV Wageningen
Nederland
Postbus 8129
6700 EV Wageningen
Nederland
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
aged 18-30, right-handedness, Body Mass Index between 20 and 25 kg/m2, and healthy, as judged by the subject.
Exclusion criteria
smoking, dieting, restrained eating, an allergy to the test foods, and the use of medication with a possible effect on taste and/or appetite.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
| Register | ID |
|---|---|
| CCMO | NL15958.081.07 |