The aim of the present study was to evaluate the difference in plaque removing efficacy of new and a used toothbrush used in a professional brushing model.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
Synonym
Health condition
gingivitis
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Endpoint: Standardized measurements and scoring procedures determine the effect
of the oral hygiene procedure on levels of plaque and gingival abrasion over
the evaluation period
Secondary outcome
nvt
Background summary
Control of plaque on the tooth surfaces is the most important method of
controlling dental disease. A manual toothbrush is the most popular mechanical
method of plaque control. In spite of the activity in improving toothbrush type
and design, most people still remove only approximately 50% of the plaque
present when they brush their teeth (Jepsen 1998). There have been numerous
investigations of the effects of toothbrushes, few have investigated the length
of time a toothbrush can be expected to last or how the pattern of wear of a
toothbrush affects the removal of plaque. The effective life of a manual
toothbrush wear is questionable.
Study objective
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the difference in plaque removing
efficacy of new and a used toothbrush used in a professional brushing model.
Study design
The study is designed to evaluate the difference in plaque removing efficacy of
new and used toothbrushes. After screening, all subjects will receive an ADA
flat trimmed reference brush toothbrush, and will be instructed to use it at
home, brushing twice daily for 2 minutes on each occasion, for the duration of
the pre-trial (12 weeks). At the second visit, subjects return after abstaining
for 48 hours from all oral hygiene procedures. Plaque (Quigley & Hein) and
gingival abrasion (GA) will be assessed. Subjects will be professionally
brushed by a dental hygienist with both a new and the brush used by the subject
during the pre-trial phase. Brushes will be randomly allocated to either the
first and the third, or the second and the fourth quadrant. Thirty seconds of
brushing time is allowed for each quadrant, bringing the total brushing time to
2 min. After this procedure all subjects will be reassessed for both plaque and
gingival abrasion.
Intervention
Brushing with a used toothbrush in comparison to a new toothbrush in relation
to plaque removing efficacy.
Study burden and risks
Risk for subjects: none.
Louwesweg 1
1066 EA Amsterdam
Nederland
Louwesweg 1
1066 EA Amsterdam
Nederland
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
At least 5 evaluable teeth in each quadrant
Exclusion criteria
Overt signs of untreated caries
Pockets exceeding 5mm
A history of usage of antibiotics during three months preceding the study
Presence of acute oral lesions
Orthodontic banding
Partial dentures
Limited number of crowns or bridges.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL17282.018.07 |