To demonstrate superiority of tiotropium vs. salmeterol in reducing exacerbations which are an important patient outcome because they are a major cause of morbidity from COPD. In addition, they are associated with a more rapid decline in lung…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Upper respiratory tract disorders (excl infections)
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The Primary Endpoint is the time to first COPD exacerbation
Secondary outcome
The Secondary Endpoints are:
1. Occurrence of at least one exacerbation
2. Number of COPD exacerbations
3. Time to first hospitalisation due to COPD exacerbation
4. Occurrence of at least one hospitalization due to COPD exacerbations
5. Number of hospitalisations due to COPD exacerbations
6. Time to premature discontinuation of trial medication
7. Occurrence of premature discontinuation of trial medication
8. Pre-dose morning PEFR measured by patients at home during the first four
months of randomised treatment (weekly means will be calculated)
9. Time to first COPD exacerbation or time to discontinuation of study
medication because of worsening of underlying disease, whichever comes first
Background summary
Several drug therapies have been shown to reduce exacerbations. Inhaled
long-acting ß2-agonists such as salmeterol and formoterol have somewhat
conflicting data regarding effects on exacerbations while the long-acting
anticholinergic tiotropium appears to consistently reduce exacerbation rates
[P99-01272, P03-01576, P03-01593, P04-00293, P05-09172, R07-0368].
Nevertheless, both are recommended in international guidelines for the
treatment of COPD as maintenance therapy [P05-12781]. In clinical trials,
tiotropium has been shown to improve lung function, health-related quality of
life, dyspnoea, exercise tolerance and to prevent exacerbations [P02-01288,
P02-01290, P03-04061, P04-1571]. However, it is still unclear whether
tiotropium can be demonstrated in a randomized, blinded clinical trial to be
more effective in reducing exacerbations compared with long-acting ß2-agonists
such as salmeterol.
Study objective
To demonstrate superiority of tiotropium vs. salmeterol in reducing
exacerbations which are an important patient outcome because they are a major
cause of morbidity from COPD. In addition, they are associated with a more
rapid decline in lung function over time and contribute to decline of
health-related quality of life
Study design
One year randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group design.
Study consists of 6 visits (Screening, study start, 2, 4, 8 and 12 months) and
8 telephone calls monthly between the visits. Patients randomized by IVRS into
2 groups: tiotropium 18 mcg once daily via the HandiHaler® + placebo MDI twice
daily or salmeterol 50 mcg twice daily + placebo capsules once daily via the
HandiHaler®.
Pharmacogenetic sub-study: Participation is voluntary and is not a prerequisite
for participation in the study. One blood sample will be taken from patients
who have signed separate informed consent.
Intervention
Subjects will be randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups: tiotropium 18
mcg once daily via the HandiHaler® + placebo MDI twice daily or salmeterol 50
mcg twice daily + placebo capsules once daily via the HandiHaler®.
Subjects who are at screening treated with tiotropium will be switched to
ipatropium first due to the long elimination half-life of tiotropium.
Study burden and risks
Tiotropium is indicated as a maintenance bronchodilator treatment to relieve
symptoms of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [see
SPC].
Salmeterol is a selective β2-agonist indicated for reversible airways
obstruction in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
(COPD) [see SPC].
In the present clinical trial, both medications will be studied within their
approved indications.
Safety evaluations:
1. Serious adverse events
2. Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation
3. All-cause mortality during treatment with study medication
4. All-cause mortality including follow-up of vital status from patients who
prematurely discontinue treatment
5. Physical examination
Health economic analysis: For the purpose of a separate health economic
analysis (for example cost-effectiveness analysis including the clinical
endpoint as the effectiveness parameter), health care resource utilization
(HCRU) data will be collected.
Pharmacogenetic sub-study: Participation is voluntary and is not a prerequisite
for participation in the study. One blood sample will be taken from patients
who have signed separate informed consent.
Binger Strasse 173
55218 Ingelheim
Duitsland
Binger Strasse 173
55218 Ingelheim
Duitsland
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Current or ex-smoker, 40 years of age or older, diagnosed with COPD with at least one exacerbation within the past year requiring treatment.
Patients must have a post-bronchodilator FEV1 <= 70% of predicted normal and FEV1 <= 70% of FVC post-bronchodilator.
Exclusion criteria
Patients with cardiac-related conditions, significant diseases other than COPD and other concomitant conditions and therapies that will have an impact on the wellbeing of the patient or may influence either the result of the study or the patients' ability to participate in the study.
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EudraCT | EUCTR2007-001840-33-NL |
CCMO | NL20013.003.07 |