To determine whether patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus in sub-optimal glycemic control can achieve better glycemic control as evidenced by a drop in HbA1c using the Medtronic MiniMed Paradigm® REAL-Time Pump and the continuous Glucose…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Glucose metabolism disorders (incl diabetes mellitus)
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
To determine whether patients with diabetes mellitus can achieve better
glycemic control as evidenced by a drop in HbA1c of 0.3%.
Secondary outcome
To determine whether patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus in sub-optimal
glycemic control using PRT compared to CSII alone with SMBG can achieve:
*Reduced glycemic variability
*Increased time in euglycemia
*Reduced occurrence of hypo- and hyperglycemia
*Improved treatment satisfaction
*Reduced number of severe hypoglycemic events
*Reduced number of diabetic ketoacidosis events
*Changed treatment patterns: total daily insulin dose, basal patterns,
basal/bolus ratio, number of daily boluses, types of boluses and timing
*Reduced total number of admissions to emergency room and hospitalizations
(number and duration) due to diabetic-related events
*Reduced number of days missing school (children/adolescents) or missing work
(adolescents/adults), due to diabetic-related events
Background summary
Improving glycemic control in people with diabetes, has been shown to decrease
risks of micro-vascular, neurological, and renal complications associated with
the condition[1]. The landmark DCCT trial [1] also clearly established that
achieving an HbA1c of 7.0% or less through an intensive insulin therapy (IIT)
can reduce or delay the incidence and onset of diabetic complications.
In current clinical practice IIT with multiple daily injections (MDI) or
continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) is well established to lower
and maintain average glucose levels. Nevertheless, patients trying to reduce
their HbA1c often achieve this at the expense of increased risk of
hypoglycemia.
Reaching target HbA1c levels depends upon monitoring blood glucose (BG) levels
and titrating therapy to reduce glycemic excursions. Reducing glycaemic
excursions minimizes the risk of acute complications of hypoglycaemia and
diabetic ketoacidosis. Strict glycemic control is more difficult to achieve
with MDI, due to variability in absorption[4] and timing of insulin injections.
This reason often precipitates a switch to CSII. Several studies have shown
superiority of CSII over MDI regarding clinical outcomes[2-11] and quality of
life [5-13] .
The majority of patients assess their BG through self monitoring blood glucose
(SMBG) using fingerstick measurements, to assess and adjust their therapy.
Nevertheless, many patients perform SMBG tests infrequently due to
inconvenience, pain, or therapy burden. Using only SMBG as reference point to
establish glycemia profiles results in a certain amount of missed hyper- and
hypoglycemic events every day [14-15]. Moreover, the DCCT trial[1] showed that
subjects in the IIT arm experienced a 3.3 fold higher incidence of severe
hypoglycemia than the control group despite performing SMBG four or more times
daily.
It is possible to avoid missing hyper- and hypoglycemic excursions with the
development of new devices which continuously measure and display continuous
glucose values. Several studies using these devices have demonstrated that
availability of continuous glucose values helps patients reduce hyper- and
hypoglycemic excursions, and improve HbA1c values [16-21]. In 2006, Deiss et
al[22] published the first randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating
whether Type 1 patients using MDI or CSII, in poor glycemic control could
improve HbA1c using a continuous glucose monitor, the Guardian REAL-Time®. This
trial demonstrated a significant reduction in HbA1c over 3 months.
Study objective
To determine whether patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus in sub-optimal
glycemic control can achieve better glycemic control as evidenced by a drop in
HbA1c using the Medtronic MiniMed Paradigm® REAL-Time Pump and the continuous
Glucose Monitoring System versus the Medtronic MiniMed Paradigm® REAL-Time Pump
alone with Self Monitoring Blood Glucose (SMBG).
Study design
This study is a randomized, two-arm, controlled, cross-over, multi-center trial
in adult and pediatric subjects in Europe. There is a wash out period between
the two treatment phases.
The study is a post-market release trial, as all study devices and related
software (see section 5.3) are CE marked.
Study burden and risks
There are possible risks and side effects connected to the device and followed
procedures. Possible additional risks include the following (although others
are possible):
*Skin irritation, bruising, discomfort, redness, bump, bleeding, irritation,
pain, rash, infection, appearance of a small *freckle-like* dot where the
sensor needle was inserted, local infection at sensor site and allergy to
sensor components or dressing.
If irritation of the insertion site is noted, then the sensor will be removed.
It is recommended to wear the glucose sensor for 3 days. If it is worn for
longer periods it may cause such problems. To ensure correct placement of the
sensor and to minimize discomfort upon insertion, an insertion device
(Sen-Serter) will be used to insert the sensor (Sen-Serter will be provided to
you at the beginning of the study treatment).
*Alarms may alert you that you are too high or too low, and on checking your
blood glucose with a fingerstick, you may find that the value is acceptable.
Nevertheless it can happen that the alarm alerts you unnecessarily.
This should be discussed with your physician so that the alarms can be adjusted.
*Inaccurate glucose values or inappropriate alarms provided by the device could
result in inappropriate administration of insulin or ingestion of
carbohydrates. Such inappropriate treatment decisions could result in
exacerbation of the symptoms associated with hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia.
Such risks can be minimized if you always follow the instruction to confirm any
hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia alarms or symptoms using the glucose meter prior to
taking any action based on the alarm or displayed glucose values.
In case of risks outweighing the benefits for your well-being, your physician
or Medtronic can decide to terminate your participation in the clinical study.
Earl Bakkenstraat 10
NL-6422 PJ Heerlen
Nederland
Earl Bakkenstraat 10
NL-6422 PJ Heerlen
Nederland
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
*Type 1 diabetes mellitus diagnosed for at least 12 months prior to signature of informed consent,
*Sub-optimal glycemic control (7.5%*Patient treated by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) for at least 6 months prior signature of informed consent.
*Patient treated within the practice of the investigator*s center at least 6 months prior signature of informed consent.
*Patient has no preliminary experience with the sensor function of the PRT or the Guardian® REAL-Time for the 4 months prior signature of informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
Existing pregnancy or intention to conceive (as assessed by investigator).
*Hearing or vision impairment so that glucose display and alarms cannot be recognized.
*Three or more incidents in the last 12 months of severe hypoglycaemia with documented BG below 50mg/dL (if possible), resulting in unconsciousness, hospitalisation or third party assistance, where recovery follows treatment with glucose or glucagon or similar.
Design
Recruitment
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
Other | CCT-NAPN-17327 |
CCMO | NL21232.098.07 |