The primary objective is to study the efficacy of AET and CBT in decreasing experienced fatigue in patients with FSHD. Secondary objectives are (1) to identify generic and disease-specific determinants of effects, (2) to evaluate the effect of CBT…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Muscle disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
At baseline, after conclusion of the intervention and after 3 and 6 months
follow-up experienced fatigue will be assessed by the subscale fatigue of the
Checklist Individual Strength
Secondary outcome
aerobic exercise tolerance
muscle strength
cardiovascular risk factors
limitations in autonomy and participation
objective and subejctive phyiscal activity in daily life
pain
fall incidence
psychological well being and sleeping pattern
self perceived functional status
coping style
illness cognitions
perceived control or self efficacy
motivation
concentration
social support
experienced fatigue of first relative
caregiver strain
optional:
metabolic profile of muscles, blood and urine
Background summary
In facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) muscle function is impaired and
declines over time. Currently there is no effective therapeutic treatment
available for FSHD. Loss of muscle strength contributes to experienced fatigue
through a lower level of physical activity. Fatigue and physical inactivity
determine social dependency and loss of participation. Therefore, to decrease
experienced fatigue and improve quality of life, two distinctly different
therapeutic approaches can be followed: aerobic exercise training (AET) to
maintain functional capacity or a cognitive-behavioral approach (CBT) to
stimulate an active life-style yet avoiding excessive physical strain. There is
preliminary evidence for the effectiveness of aerobic exercise in FSHD. CBT has
been proven effective in chronic fatigue syndrome and post-cancer fatigue. AET
and CBT are hypothesized to be both more effective in improving activity level
and, with that, decreasing experienced fatigue of FSHD patients compared to the
usual care. The maintenance of the beneficial effects of CBT may be longer than
those of AET, because the changes in activity level are achieved more
intrinsically.
Study objective
The primary objective is to study the efficacy of AET and CBT in decreasing
experienced fatigue in patients with FSHD. Secondary objectives are (1) to
identify generic and disease-specific determinants of effects, (2) to evaluate
the effect of CBT and AET in reducing fall incidence, (3) to obtain insight
into patients* expectations of, and experiences with both interventions and
compare these with health care professionals* views and experiences.
Study design
a randomized controlled trial.
Intervention
one group will receive AET consisting of 3 days a week aerobic cycling exercise
for a period of 16 weeks. Twice a week they will exercise at home and once a
week individually guided in group sessions in a rehabilitation centre. The
second group will receive a maximum number of 16 sessions of CBT during 16
weeks for treatment of the factors maintaining the fatigue. The third group
will receive care as usual, for 16 weeks and will be placed on a waiting list.
They will be randomized to one of the training groups after 7 months.
Study burden and risks
There are very little risks associated with participation, as none of the
interventions or clinical measurements are invasive. The proposed tehrapies
have little to none known side-effects. The safety standards for training are
strictly followed.
Reinier Postlaan 4
6525 GC Nijmegen
NL
Reinier Postlaan 4
6525 GC Nijmegen
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
(1) aged 18 years and older
(2) a life-expectancy longer than one year
(3) suffering from severe experienced fatigue (i.e. a score on the CIS-fatigue >= 35)
(4) ability to walk independently (ankle-foot orthoses and canes are accepted)
(5) being able to exercise on a bicycle ergometer
(6) being able to complete the intervention
Exclusion criteria
(1) cognitive impairment
(2) insufficient mastery of the Dutch language
(3) disabling co-morbidity interfering with the intervention programs or influencing outcome parameters
(4) pregnancy
(5) use of psychotropic drugs (except simple sleeping medication)
(6) severe cardiopulmonary disease (chest pain, arrhythmia, pacemaker, cardiac surgery, severe dyspnoea d* effort, emphysema)
(7) epileptic seizures
(8) poorly regulated diabetes mellitus or hypertension
(9) clinical depression, as diagnosed with Beck Depression Inventory for primary care (BDI-PC) (Arnau et al. 2001) (Beck et al. 1997)
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL23082.091.08 |