The EchoCRT trial evaluates the effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) on mortality and morbidity of subjects with heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction, already receiving optimized HF medication, with a narrow QRS…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Cardiac disorders, signs and symptoms NEC
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Primary Outcome Measures:
The primary efficacy endpoint will evaluate the effect of CRT=ON versus CRT=OFF
in time to event of a combined endpoint of all-cause mortality or first
hospitalization for worsening heart failure. [ Time Frame: Full study duration
(event driven trial). Minimum 1 year follow-up and expected median patient
follow-up duration of 2 years. ]
The primary safety endpoint will evaluate the complication-free rate at 6
months of the Lumax HF-T CRT-D devices in the narrow QRS subject population. [
Time Frame: 6 months ]
Secondary outcome
Secondary Outcome Measures:
Evaluate the all-cause mortality rate between the CRT=ON compared to CRT=OFF
group.
Evaluate the effects of CRT=ON compared to CRT=OFF on the rate of
hospitalization for worsening heart failure.
Evaluate the effects of CRT=ON compared to CRT=OFF in relation to the change in
NYHA classification.
Evaluate the effects of CRT=ON compared to CRT=OFF in relation to the change in
the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF) Quality of Life Questionnaire.
Evaluate the effects of CRT=ON compared to CRT=OFF in relation to a composite
endpoint of all-cause mortality, hospitalization for worsening heart failure
and change in the MLHF Quality of Life Questionnaire.
Background summary
Previous randomized clinical trials with CRT provided evidence of an
improvement of HF symptoms, exercise capacity, quality of life and a relative
and absolute reduction in all-cause mortality. CRT has been included in the
official guidelines for the management of heart failure subjects. These
guidelines currently still recommend a QRS width of > 120ms as a criterion for
prescription of CRT. Results of more recent studies, however, indicate that the
QRS width alone is a weak marker for LV dyssynchrony and a poor guide to
treatment benefit for CRT. So far, only single center trials and a small
multi-center randomised controlled pilot study have been conducted evaluating
CRT in subjects with HF and narrow QRS. Thus, CRT treatment could be of
therapeutic benefit in the majority of HF patients with a narrow QRS width
(<120 ms), of whom up to 50% exhibit LV dyssynchrony.
Study objective
The EchoCRT trial evaluates the effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
(CRT) on mortality and morbidity of subjects with heart failure due to left
ventricular systolic dysfunction, already receiving optimized HF medication,
with a narrow QRS width (< 130 ms) and echocardiographic evidence of
ventricular dyssynchrony
Study design
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Investigator,
Outcomes Assessor), Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
All patients will receive a commercially available BIOTRONIK Lumax HF-T CRT-D
system with ICD back-up enabled. Patients will be randomized to CRT=ON or
CRT=OFF.
Intervention
Study Type: interventional
Device: Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator with Cardiac Resynchronization
Therapy (BIOTRONIK Lumax HF-T CRT-D)
Study burden and risks
All patients are indicated for an ICD and wil be implanted with a biventricular
ICD system (CRT-D: BIOTRONIK Lumax HF-T). All devices used are CE marked.
Potential risks for the patient related to this study include those typical of
a CRT-D system implant (more specifically the positioning of the left
ventricular electrode). CRT therapy will be randomised to CRT=ON and CRT=OFF
group. 50% of patients will not benefit from the left ventricular lead implant
whereas the other 50% have the potential to benefit from the CRT therapy.
Approximately 1 month after the randomisation the investigator will evaluate
the CRT-D system, the HF medication and perform a clinical evaluation on the HF
status. During a period of 24 months these investigations are repeated every 3
months. The HF treatment as described in the protocol is in accordance with the
current medical treatment of HF patients. Additionally there is: an
echocardiogram (at baseline, 6 and 12 month), 6 minute walk test (baseline and
at month 6, 12 and 24), BNP measurement (at baseline, 6 and 12 month) and a
MLHF questionnaire (baseline and at month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24). After the 24
month visit the patient is requested to return every 3 months for standard
follow-up visits until the study is over.
Jean road 6024
OR 97035 Lake Oswego
US
Jean road 6024
OR 97035 Lake Oswego
US
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
indication for ICD
systolic heart failure: LVEF < 35% and LVEDD > 55 mm
NYHA III-IV under optimal medical therapy
QRS < 130 ms
ventricular dyssynchrony measured by Echo + confirmed by Echo Core Lab
18 years of age or older
Exclusion criteria
Contraindication(s) to an ICD.
Already implanted with a pacemaker or an ICD
Bradycardia pacing indication
Pregnant, lactating or planning to become pregnant females.
CABG, PTCA, or MI within the past 3 months prior to enrollment or CABG or PTCA intervention planned in the next 3 months.
Irreversible brain damage from preexisting cerebral disease.
Reversible non-ischemic cardiomyopathy such as acute viral myocarditis.
Permanent 2º or 3º heart block.
Chagas disease.
Persistent, permanent, or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation within 1 month prior to enrollment.
Expected to receive heart transplantation within 6 months.
Have a life expectancy of less than 6 months
Creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL or liver failure
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT00683696 |
CCMO | NL25448.058.08 |