Objectives: In this study we investigate possible correlations between cognitive impairment as well as response to AED treatment in children with FLE and abnormalities in brain micro-structure, function and neuronal connectivity. Therefore, we apply…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Seizures (incl subtypes)
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Main study parameters/endpoints: These new techniques may reveal structural
abnormalities that are related to FLE or cognitive impairment or refractoriness
or all.
So endpoints are the macro-structural, micro-structural and functional
integrity, seizure history, IQ, and response to anti-epileptic drug treatment.
Secondary outcome
Patient-related and epilepsy-related factors responsible for cognitive
deterioration and refractoriness
Background summary
Rationale: Frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE), i.e. epilepsy with a frontal epileptic
focus, represents a substantial proportion of all partial epilepsies. After the
diagnosis FLE is made, the prognosis is still uncertain. Part of the children
responds well to antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment, while others will become
refractory and have frequent and disabling seizures. A second problem next to
response to medication is that part of the children with FLE will suffer from
cognitive impairment. The nature and severity of this impairment is highly
variable. Up to now, no clear patient or epilepsy-related factors responsible
for refractoriness and cognitive changes have been identified, and structural
MRI scans often reveal no abnormalities. Therefore, no currently known markers
enable clinicians to recognise this patient category. Hence, a tool for the
recognition of patients at risk for refractory epilepsy and cognitive
impairment is needed to increase our understanding of the neuronal substrate
and thus aetiology of refractoriness as well as cognitive impairment. This, in
turn, may open new possibilities for pro-active therapy, including drug
development.
As micro-structural and functional changes at the cellular level expectedly
precede macro-structural changes, we hypothesize that new MRI techniques,
diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) task related functional magnetic resonance
imaging (fMRI) and resting state fMRI, are potentially more suitable to
identify any neuronal changes associated with cognitive decline and/or
refractoriness relative to structural MRI.
Study objective
Objectives: In this study we investigate possible correlations between
cognitive impairment as well as response to AED treatment in children with FLE
and abnormalities in brain micro-structure, function and neuronal connectivity.
Therefore, we apply new MRI-techniques, including DTI, task related fMRI and
resting state fMRI.
Study design
Study design: Cohort study
Study burden and risks
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation,
benefit and group relatedness: The purposed MRI-techniques are non-invasive,
the burden minimal. The risks are negligible because we do not use contrast
agents or anaesthetics. The main burden is that children have to lay down
quietly in the noisy MRI scan for one hour.
Though, in theory, it is possible that structural abnormalities will be found
during MRI in the healthy control group. Therefore, study participation will
only be allowed if people give their approval that whenever structural
abnormalities are found, they and their general practitioner will be informed.
Recruitment of children is essential to the subject matter of the study, as
frontal lobe epilepsy is basically a disease of childhood. The core aspects of
our study, the emergence of cognitive impairment as well as refractoriness, are
both observed early in the course of FLE, thus at childhood. Both conditions
have a lasting impact on mental and social functioning. To elucidate their
causative mechanisms demands their study during their time of emergence.
The study of possible neuronal correlates of cognitive impairment and
refractoriness in FLE demands the inclusion of an age-matched control group.
The imaging of the normally developing brain provides a baseline for
comparisons, both with FLE and FLE complicated by cognitive impairment or
refractoriness.
Directiesecretariaat kempenhaeghe, Postbus 61
5590 AB Heeze
Nederland
Directiesecretariaat kempenhaeghe, Postbus 61
5590 AB Heeze
Nederland
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
calibration study:
• Adults aged 18 years or older
• Normal intelligence;Patients with frontal lobe epilepsy:
• Patients aged 8 to18 years
• Clinical and electroencephalographic evidence of seizures originating from the frontal lobe. When EEG is not informative, we require the recording of more than one seizure with clinical evidence of seizures originating from the frontal lobe (Provini et al (1)).
• Non-symptomatic epilepsy;Healthy control group:
• Children aged 8 to 18 years
• Normal intelligence/following regular schools
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria for the healthy adult group for the calibration study:
• Medical history of head trauma or other diseases/ causes that may underlie cognitive impairment (i.e. psychiatric diseases, unable to speak/understand the Dutch language)
• Vision less than +4.5D or - 4.5D
• Claustrophobia
• Metal implants or other contraindication for MRI
• Persons who do not want to get informed whenever structural abnormalities are found during imaging;Exclusion criteria for children with FLE:
• Multiple seizure foci involving more than one lobe of the brain documented on previous EEG studies
• Frontal lobe seizures thought to be a result of spread to the frontal lobes
• MRI lesions on previous structural brain MRI- or CT-scans or symptomatic epilepsy (e.g. tumours, vascular abnormalities, congenital dysgenesia)
• Full scale IQ<70 on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (Wechsler 1991).
• Progressive neurological disorders
• Other diseases/ causes that may underlie cognitive impairment (i.e. psychiatric diseases, unable to speak/understand the Dutch language)
• Cognitive deterioration directly after starting with AED, or treatment with Topiramate or Phenobarbital
• Vision less than +4.5D or - 4.5D
• Claustrophobia
• Metal implants or other contraindication for MRI
• Parents not willing to provide informed consent;Exclusion criteria for the healthy control children:
• Medical history of head trauma or other diseases/ causes that may underlie cognitive impairment (i.e. psychiatric diseases, unable to speak/understand the Dutch language)
• Vision less than +4.5D or - 4.5D
• Claustrophobia
• Metal implants or other contraindication for MRI
• Parents not willing to provide informed consent
• Parents who do not want to get informed whenever structural abnormalities are found during imaging
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL23987.068.08 |