Aims of this study are:1) To study the endoscopic and histological regeneration pattern of NSE after RFA of BE.2) To compare the histological and immunohistochemical characteristics of NSE to normal untreated squamous epithelium.3) To compare NSE,…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Malignant and unspecified neoplasms gastrointestinal NEC
- Gastrointestinal neoplasms malignant and unspecified
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
1. Morphological stages of the epithelium during the squamous regeneration
process after RFA.
2. Expression of relevant proteins in the epithelium during the squamous
regeneration process after RFA.
3. Presence of loss of heterozygosity and single-nucleotide polymorphisms in
the regenerating NSE, in the submucosal gland ducts in BE, and in normal
squamous epithelium.
Secondary outcome
1. Morphological characteristics of NSE compared to untreated squamous
epithelium.
2. Expression of relevant proteins with immunohistochemical staining in NSE and
in untreated squamous epithelium.
Background summary
Barrett esophagus (BE) is a condition in which the normal squamous lining of
the esophagus has been replaced by columnar epithelium containing specialized
intestinal metaplasia (IM), as a result of long-standing gastro-esophageal
reflux. Malignant degeneration in BE progresses through a series of morphologic
changes from IM to low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) and high-grade
intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN), to early cancer (EC). To prevent malignant
progression, patients with BE can be treated with endoscopic ablation in order
to eradicate the BE.
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a relatively new endoscopic technique for
ablation of BE. Data from clinical studies suggests that RFA is an efficacious
modality for eradication of all Barrett epithelium and associated neoplasia, it
has a low complication rate, preserves esophageal functional integrity, and is
relatively easy to apply. The process of regeneration and factors that
contribute to conversion of BE into neo-squamous epithelium (NSE) after RFA
are, however, poorly understood. Some patients undergoing RFA require only a
single treatment for complete reversion of their BE into NSE whereas others
show poor healing without significant regression. There are several hypotheses
concerning the origin of the NSE after ablation therapy: outgrowth from
existing pools of squamous cell progenitors, repopulation from adjacent areas
with squamous epithelium, or regeneration from multipotent progenitor cells
from the esophageal glands or bone marrow. Further insight of this process of
squamous repopulation after RFA would be valuable for two reasons. Firstly, it
might help to identify patients with an anticipated poor response to the RFA
and/or to intervene in the regeneration process. Secondly, it may answer the
question if eradication of BE by RFA results in clearance of genetic
abnormalities of the epithelium and, thus, a reduction of the risk for
developing cancer.
Study objective
Aims of this study are:
1) To study the endoscopic and histological regeneration pattern of NSE after
RFA of BE.
2) To compare the histological and immunohistochemical characteristics of NSE
to normal untreated squamous epithelium.
3) To compare NSE, untreated squamous epithelium, and submucosal gland duct
epithelium by laser capture microdissection (LCM) for determination of loss of
heterozygosity and single nucleotide polymorphisms, in order to establish more
insight in the lineage of the NSE.
Study design
For this prospective study, we will include 10 patients with BE that will be
treated with primary circumferential RFA according to standard guidelines.
6-8 weeks prior to ablation, patients will undergo a work-up endoscopy to
thoroughly map the BE, as is the current standard in all patients undergoing
RFA treatment. During these work-up endoscopies, visible lesions are removed
with endoscopic resection (ER) for histological staging, and biopsies are
obtained from the remaining BE to evaluate the presence of residual neoplasia.
In the patients that will be included for this study, an additional
single-piece ER will be obtained from BE that is not suspicious for carcinoma
(based on endoscopic appearance and prior biopsies), and from squamous
epithelium.
In the majority of patients, the esophagus has healed and most of the BE has
been repopulated with squamous epithelium about 6 weeks after RFA. Patients are
then rescheduled for endoscopy to assess the treatment effect, and if
necessary, for additional RFA treatment of residual Barrett epithelium.
For this study, patients will be scheduled for two additional endoscopies
within 6 weeks after the primary RFA procedure. During these endoscopies a
single-piece ER will be performed to obtain a tissue sample of the ablated area
during the squamous regeneration phase. By scheduling patients at 1&3, 2&5,
3&6, 1.5&3.5, and 2.5&4.5 weeks after RFA, two tissue specimens will be
obtained at 10 sequential intervals during the squamous regeneration period.
With the exception of ER specimens obtained from visible lesions during work-up
endoscopy, all ER specimens from the pre-RFA BE, normal squamous epithelium,
and from the ablated area after RFA, will be divided in half. One half will be
fixated in formalin for histological evaluation of morphological changes and
IHC staining to evaluate expression of relevant proteins. The other half of the
ER specimen will be fixated in liquid nitrogen for molecular evaluation, using
LCM to selectively obtain cell structures from the submucosal glands.
Two months after complete conversion of the BE into NSE by RFA, patients are
scheduled for standard follow-up endoscopy. During follow-up endoscopy biopsies
are obtained from the NSE (usually around 16 biopsies) for histological
evaluation to confirm the eradication of IM. For this study, 8 additional
biopsies will be obtained from the untreated squamous epithelium of which half
will be fixated in formalin and half in liquid nitrogen.
Study burden and risks
During ER using the multiband mucosectomy technique, minor bleeding may occur
in 6% of cases, usually easily managed with endoscopic hemostatic techniques.
Meibergdreef 9
1105 AZ
Nederland
Meibergdreef 9
1105 AZ
Nederland
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
* Age 18-85 years;
* Circumferential Barrett segment of 3-8 cm;
* Scheduled for primary circumferential RFA of Barrett epithelium with flat low-grade or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, or residual Barrett epithelium (with or without neoplasia) after prior endoscopic resection for lesions containing high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and/or cancer;
* No esophageal stricturing, defined as difficulties when passing a therapeutic endoscope;
* Written informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
* In the case of an endoscopic resection, histological evaluation showing: signs of deep submucosal infiltration (>T1sm1), poorly or undifferentiated cancer, irradical resection at the deep resection margin, or lymphatic/vascular invasion;
* Visible lesions in the Barrett segment prior to RFA;
* Any biopsy with residual cancer after the endoscopic resection;
* Unable to sign informed consent.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL24858.018.08 |