To investigate the hypothesis that in women with a multiple pregnancy prophylactic use of a pessary will be effective in the prevention of preterm delivery and the neonatal mortality and morbidity resulting from preterm delivery. To assess in women…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Pregnancy, labour, delivery and postpartum conditions
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The main outcome parameter is the composite morbidity rate of children in the
two groups. This composite morbidity rate contains the following variables:
severe Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS), Broncho Pulmonal Dysplasia (BPD),
Intraventricular Haemorrhage II B or worse, Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC),
proven sepsis and death before discharge from the nursery (6). They will be
measured until 6 weeks after the date of delivery.
Secondary outcome
Secondary outcome measures are time to delivery, preterm birth rate before 32
and 37 weeks, days of admission in neonatal intensive care unit, maternal
morbidity, maternal admission days for preterm labour and costs. At present, a
longer follow-up is not planned.
Background summary
Preterm birth is the major cause of handicaps in genetically normal children
despite the enormous advanced neonatal care during the last decades. So,
prevention of preterm birth is the major goal of obstetrical care. However,
strategies to prevent preterm birth have been largely unsuccessful.
Twin pregnancies are at high risk for preterm birth. In the Netherlands about
15% of the women with a multiple pregnancy deliver before 34 weeks of
gestation. At present, about 1 in 60 pregnancies is a twin pregnancy, and about
30% of the preterm born children admitted in a neonatal care (NICU) are from
twin pregnancies (Source: LVR (Dutch Obstetrical Database), LNR (Dutch Neonatal
Database)). Due to an increase in age of pregnant women and an increase in
assisted reproductive technologies the incidence of twin pregnancies is still
rising.
The financial burden of preterm born babies is enormous: about ¤ 1500,- per day
when admitted in a NICU with the concomitant costs in case the child appears to
be handicapped, for both parents as the society in general. The composite poor
neonatal outcome contains severe RDS, broncho pulmonal dysplasia (BPD),
intraventricular haemorrhage II B or worse (IVH), periventricular leucomalacia
(PVL), necrotizing entercolitis (NEC), sepsis and death before discharge
(Guinn). The prevalence of this composite neonatal outcome is 77%, 35% and 12%
in children born after early preterm delivery between 24-27, 28-32 and 32-34
weeks, respectively. After 34 weeks this incidence sharply declines to less
than 2% at term. The probability that a woman delivers at these gestational
ages is 1.8%, 5.4% and 7.2%, respectively. In total, this means that about 8%
of the multiple pregnancies will result in the death of at least one child,
whereas in 7% of the pregnancies at least one of the children will remain
severely disabled. Moreover, another 20% of the pregnancies results in a
moderate handicap of at least one of the children.
Women with a twin pregnancy are seen by a gynaecologist for their antenatal
care. Although preterm birth is known to be the most important complication of
a twin pregnancy no general accepted strategy is available to prevent this
condition.
Recently, it has been shown that prophylactic progesterone administration to
women with a singleton pregnancy at high risk for a preterm birth significantly
reduced the incidence of preterm birth. Since then, several trials have been
set up to assess whether progesterone is effective in the prevention of preterm
birth in women with a multiple pregnancy. The first trial that was published on
this subject disappointingly showed no effect of progesterone in the prevention
of preterm birth in these women.
At present, this issue is also investigated in our nationwide consortium for
obstetric trials. Our trial has at present recruited 560 of the needed 660
women, and is supposed to be completed in July 2009. Several other trials will
be completed also.
Although a no data are known at present, we anticipate a negative treatment
effect.
In this proposal, we aim to evaluate an intervention with a cervical pessary
that will be inserted any time between 12 and 20 weeks and continued till
delivery or 36 weeks gestation, whatever comes first.
With this design the hypothesis whether the use of a cervical pessary can
reduce the preterm birth rate in twin pregnancies and its concomitant composite
neonatal morbidity can be answered.
Study objective
To investigate the hypothesis that in women with a multiple pregnancy
prophylactic use of a pessary will be effective in the prevention of preterm
delivery and the neonatal mortality and morbidity resulting from preterm
delivery.
To assess in women with a multiple pregnancy the cost-effectiveness of a
pessary in the prevention of preterm delivery and the neonatal mortality and
morbidity resulting from preterm delivery.
Study design
Multicenter randomised study. The study will not be blinded. The study will be
stratified for parity (previous vaginal delivery or not), chorionicity
(multichorial versus monochorial) and number of multiples (twin or higher order
gestation).
Intervention
Eligible women will be randomly allocated to receive either a cervical pessary
or no intervention. The cervical pessary will be placed in situ at 16 to 20
weeks, and will stay in situ up to 36 weeks gestation.
Study burden and risks
De burden and risks for women participating in this study will be minimal. When
a patient is randomly selected to use a pessary, it wil be placed between 16
and 20 weeks gestation. The number of visits to the outpatient clinic will not
differ much from the number of normal visits during a multiple pregnancy. The
women will undergo an ulstrasound measurement of the cervix, which in some
participating centres is standard protocol for women with a multiple pregnancy.
Next to this research intervention cases are treated according to the local
protocol in the participating clinics and other interventions i.e. tocolysis
and corticosteroids in case of a threatened preterm birth.
Meibergdreef 9
Postbus 22660 1100 DD Amsterdam
NL
Meibergdreef 9
Postbus 22660 1100 DD Amsterdam
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
All women presenting with a multiple pregnancy (monochorionic and bichorionic) between 12 and 20 weeks of gestation are eligible for the study
Exclusion criteria
Women with multiple pregnancies in which at least one of the fetus(es) has major congenital anomalies known at study entry will not be included
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL26941.018.09 |