The goal of this research is to analyse wether the placement of the Avantage cup leads to a better stability of the hip. We will also analyse the patient functional outcome and the radiographic results.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Joint disorders
- Bone and joint therapeutic procedures
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Number of dislocations
Secondary outcome
Functional outcome scores (Harris Hip Score, Oxford Hip Score and the HOOS)
Radiographic results: osteolysis using Gruen and Delee-Charnley zonal system.
Background summary
After placement of a hipprosthesis there is a dislocation prevalence of 3%.
After revisionsurgery this prevalence rises to between 5% and 20%. In case of
instability of a hip prosthesis (recurrent dislocations or subluxations) or
when a postoperative instability is foreseen it is possible to choose a
prosthesis with a more constraint design. The design of this prosthesis will
create more stability and on the downside it will give some restriction in the
range of motion. The Avantage cup is an example of a constraint prosthesis
Study objective
The goal of this research is to analyse wether the placement of the Avantage
cup leads to a better stability of the hip. We will also analyse the patient
functional outcome and the radiographic results.
Study design
follow-up study
Study burden and risks
No risk
Burden: 1 outclinic visit that will take 30 minutes. Xray of the pelvis AP and
hip axial
Hilvarenbeekseweg 60
5022GC Tilburg
Nederland
Hilvarenbeekseweg 60
5022GC Tilburg
Nederland
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Patients who had an Avantage cup implanted
Exclusion criteria
-
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
| Register | ID |
|---|---|
| CCMO | NL27666.008.09 |