Primary research question part 1: "Is it possible, to find a difference between the contraction pattern of the abdominal muscles measured with ultrasound between pregnant women with and without low back pain?*Primary research question part 2:…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Joint disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
To be able to answer the primary research question part 1 the following primary
study parameters will be used:
- the thickness (in mm) of the three abdominal muscles in the lateral part of
the abdominal wall during rest and during 5 described test situations.
- the answer on the question: *Did you feel pain in the low back region during
the past week? (Yes / No).
- the place were the pain is indicated on a drawing
To be able to answer the primary research question part 2 the following extra
primary study parameters will be used:
- the severity of pain measured on an 11-points Numeric Analog Scale.
- the severity of pain-related disability measured with the Dutch version of
the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale.
- the score on the ASLR-test (range 0-10)
Secondary outcome
To be able to answer the secondary research question the following extra
primary study parameters will be used:
- the severity of pain measured on an 11-points Numeric Analog Scale (score 4
and higher).
- the score on the ASLR-test (negative or positive).
- the score for the Posterior Pelvic Pain Provocation test (negative or
positive).
Background summary
The incidence of low back pain is high. In 85% the cause is unclear. In those
85% the back pain is labeled as non-specific, and causal treatment is
impossible. Research has shown that the contraction pattern of the transverse
abdominal muscle (TA, the deepest of the three muscles of the lateral part of
the abdominal wall) in patients with non-specific low back pain differs from
that of subjects without low back pain. Investigations by means of EMG have
shown that in patients with low back pain TA contraction is delayed. It seems
credible to assume that this changed contraction pattern reduces the strength
of the pelvic ring and the lumbar spine and seems to be one of the factors that
causes delayed recovery of back pain. In diagnosis and treatment a need exists
for a patient-friendly, reliable, sensitive and specific method to check the
contraction pattern of the TA in subjects with back pain. Currently the
judgment of the therapist is based upon inspection, palpation and sonography of
the abdomen. Reliability of inspection and palpation are low. Sonography to
measure the thickness of the abdominal muscles is very reliable. However, the
thickness at rest in patients with back pain is about the same as in controls.
Some studies show a difference of TA thickness of patients compared to controls
in special test situations e.g. during a drawing in maneuver of the abdomen.
Problems are 1) the differences between patients and controls are small and 2)
some other studies are not able to confirm the results.
The studies of the TA by means of ultrasound in patients with back pain show
several drawbacks such as: possible confounders as cause, duration and severity
of the pain are not considered, controls are recruited from a different
population than the patients; contraction pattern of the abdominal muscles is
studied at rest and/or after the instruction to tense the abdominal muscles
instead of the spontaneous contraction pattern during activities which burden
the lumbar spine. In the proposed study attempts were made to cope with these
shortcomings. It is also for these reasons that de study focuses on back pain
during pregnancy. Primary the study is explorative. In further studies the use
of possible positive findings should be tested in other patients groups than
pregnant women.
Study objective
Primary research question part 1:
"Is it possible, to find a difference between the contraction pattern of the
abdominal muscles measured with ultrasound between pregnant women with and
without low back pain?*
Primary research question part 2:
"Is it possible within a group of pregnant women with low back pain to find a
correlation between the contraction pattern of the abdominal muscles measured
with ultrasound and severity of back pain and disability?*
Secondary research question
In a subgroup analysis part 1 of the primary research question is asked again
for patients with severe pain in combination with positive scores for pelvic
girdle pain.
So:
"Is it possible, to find a difference between the contraction pattern of the
abdominal muscles measured with ultrasound between pregnant women with severe
low back pain and positive scores for tests for pelvic girdle pain and controls
without low back pain and negative scores for pelvic girdle pain?*
Study design
Cross-sectional study
Study burden and risks
1. Examination: 5 minutes
2. Ultrasound examination: 10 minutes
3. Fill in questionnaires: 5 minutes (healthy control)-10 minutes (patient)
The investigation is hardly irritating and is without any risk.
Gerrit Doustraat 95
2311 XN Leiden
Nederland
Gerrit Doustraat 95
2311 XN Leiden
Nederland
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
uncomplicated singleton pregnancy, in week 20-30;
Exclusion criteria
Insufficient knowledge of Dutch language to fill in questionnaires; low back pain with a specific cause; systemic disorders of the neuromuscular system; arthritis of spine and/or hips; severe disturbance of anatomy of back, pelvis and/or abdomen (congenital, by trauma, surgery or adipositas); severe psychopathology.
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL23627.078.08 |