This multicentre phase III study is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of recombinant versus E-Coli derived Aaparaginase from Medac, during treatment of children with newly diagnosed ALL according to the DCOG ALL-10 protocol.Futhermore: To…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Leukaemias
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
To determine the rate of patients with complete asparagine depletion in serum
during induction treatment; to demonstrate non-inferiority of recombinant
versus E-Coli derived Asparaginase Medac.
Secondary outcome
ASN depletion in CSF will be measured as a secondary endpoint at day 33 of
induction treatment.
A futher surrogate parameter for treatment efficacy of an ASnase preparation
are trough levels of ASNase activity in serum just before the next ASNase
infusion.
As an addition pharmacokenetic parameter, ASNase activity levels in CSF during
induction treatment phase A will be measured.
Besides ASN, concentrations of amino acid aspartic acid (ASP), glutamine (GLN),
and glutamic acid (GLU) will be measured in serum CSF at defined timepoints
during induction treatment. In high risk patients ASN-levels will be
additionally measured at defined time-points during post-induction treatment.
Trough levels of ASNase activity and ASN, ASP, GLN and GLU-levels in serum will
be measured at defined timepoints during post-induction treatment.
Furthermore, the number of patients in each risk group who could complete their
full course of ASNase treatment as scheduled will be documented, and assess of
incidence of AE's and the incidence of patients with hypersensitivity reactions
to the first post-induction dose.
As another secondary endpoint, efficacy of the treatment will be evaluated
wtihin this study by measuring the CR rate and the MRD status after induction
treatment phase A (day 33 or thereafter)
Complete remission (CR) is defined on morphological grounds by the presence of
< 5% leukemic blasts in bone marrow (M1 marrow), no leukemic blasts in
peripheral blood and CSF, no other documented extramedullary leukemia with the
exeption of testicular enlargement, and regeneraring haematopoieses.
In addition, the secondary endpoints relapse rate and event-free survival (EFS)
will be evaluated at the end of the study. Events are relapse or death.
Background summary
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a clonal disease resulting from genetic
mutations and transformations of a single early progenitor lymphoid cell.
Uncontrolled expansion of leukemis blasts in the bone marrow leads to
suppression of normal haematopoiesis as well as disseminated infiltration of
organs and release of blasts into the perpheral blood.
ALL is the most common malignancy in children, accounting for 30% of all
cancers and 80% of all leukemias in this age group.
The treatment of ALL depends on the use of intensive multi-agent chemotherapy
given for 2 years. In selected patients irradiation and/or stem cell
transplantation are used. Patients with ALL are usually treated within a study
protocol. In the Netherlands, children with newly diagnosed ALL are currently
treated with the national protocol of the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group (DCOG)
ALL 10.
Asparaginase (ASNase) is an essential component of treatment of children with
newly diagnosed ALL. Several recently published trials have clearly
demonstrated that this drug contributes to the total treatment outcome of
children with ALL by at least 10 - 20%. Hence, allergy against asparaginase is
an important clinical problem, as this may lead to early interruption of
asparaginase therapy, resulting in a lower cumulative asparaginase dose which
worsens prognosis.
Recombinant ASNase (rASNase) has similar enzymatic, pharmacokinetic and
pharmacodynamic properties as E.coli-ASNase but is a much purer preparation.
This new ASNase may therefore cause less hypersensitivity reactions than the
currently approved drugs. In a recent pilot study at Erasmus MC it was shown
that this drug has a similar safety profile as regular E-Coli derived
asparaginase, and leads to similar asparagine depletion. The current study is
intended to compare the efficacy of the new rASNase preparation versus the
commercially available E-Coli derived Asparaginase from Medac in a larger
number of children with newly diagnosed ALL.
Study objective
This multicentre phase III study is designed to assess the efficacy and safety
of recombinant versus E-Coli derived Aaparaginase from Medac, during treatment
of children with newly diagnosed ALL according to the DCOG ALL-10 protocol.
Futhermore: To determine the rate of patients with complete asparagine
depletion in serum during induction treatment, and to demonstrate
non-inferiority of rASNase compared to E-Coli derived Asparaginase Medac.
Study design
This is a multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, double-blind,
parallel-group phase III clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of
repeated ASNase infusions (recombinant versus E-Coli derived Asparaginase
Medac)
Intervention
Treatment consists of either recombinant asparaginase - or E-Coli derived
Asparaginase Medac infusions (8 doses) in teh induction part of teh protocol.
For post-induction treatment, all patients are stratified into 3 risk groups
(standard risk, medium risk and high risk) based on stratification criteria
defined in the ALL 10 protocol. Patients will receive different treatment
according to their risk group assignment.
For patients in the SR and MR groups treatmnet will be continued using
PEG-asparaginase, and they will be followed for allergic reactions. In
addition, limited blood sampling will be performed to detect antibodies and
check asparaginase levels.
Patients in the HR-group will continue treatment with the standard E-Coli
derived asparaginase in their chemotherapy blocks 1,2 4 and 5, and the
so-called protocol II. Therefore they will continue with the study and recieve
either recombinant or E-Coli asparaginse. Each patient will receive the same
product as in induction.
Study burden and risks
The risks and burden of participation are similar to a standard treatment for
pediatric ALL. A potential benefit may arise if we can prove that patients with
recombinant asparaginse indeed have fewer allergic reactions to asparagine,
which may increase the cumulative asparaginase dose and lead to a better
prognosis for these children. Potential risks are associated with the blood and
CSF sampling - although this will be combined with regular blood and CSF
sampling time points according to the ALL-10 protocol. New side-effects may
occur in teh recombinant asparaginase group, as only limited experience exists
in humans with this compound, althuogh this is unlikely base don the chemical,
Pk and PD properties of the drug.
Theaterstr. 6
D-22880 Wedel
DE
Theaterstr. 6
D-22880 Wedel
DE
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Previously untreated T-lineage or percusor B-lineage ALL
Morphological proof of ALL (diagnose established by bone marrow morphology with greater than or equal to 25% blasts)
Age between 1 year and 19 years
Treatment according to DCOG ALL 10 protocol
Written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
Mature B-lineage ALL
Patients with secondary ALL
Known allergy to any ASNase preparation
General health status according to Karnofsky/Lansky score < 40%
Pre-existing known coalgulopathy (e.e. haemophilia)
Pre-existing pancreatitis
Liver insufficiency (bili >50 umol/l, ALAT/ASAT >10xULN)
Other current malignancies
Pregnacy, breast feeding
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EudraCT | EUCTR2006-003180-31-NL |
CCMO | NL21435.078.08 |