2.1.1 Primary Objective:To evaluate the difference in the rates of graded pulmonary exacerbations in patients with bronchiectasis treated with inhaled mannitol compared with placebo control2.1.2 Secondary Objectives:EfficacyTo evaluate theā¦
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Bronchial disorders (excl neoplasms)
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Primary Endpoint: Pulmonary exacerbation rates (graded exacerbations)
Secondary outcome
Secondary Endpoints:
Efficacy
St George*s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores
Courses of; days on and time to need for oral, IV or inhaled antibiotics
prescribed for worsening respiratory signs and symptoms related to a treated
pulmonary exacerbation
Time to first graded exacerbation; duration of graded exacerbations
24 hour sputum volume Change in daytime sleepiness scores
Change in FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, FEF25-75 values (Exploratory) Number of
hospitalizations due to pulmonary exacerbations
Safety
Adverse events Airway reactivity following a mannitol tolerance test (MTT)
(acute decrease in FEV1 >20%) Laboratory tests: Complete blood count;
electrolytes; creatinine and blood urea nitrogen; and liver function tests
Qualitative sputum microbiology: disappearance or appearance of pathogens Vital
signs
Costs, Health Status, Utilities and Cost Effectiveness
Total costs incurred in intervention and placebo control groups
* Costs associated with inhaled mannitol
* Costs of antibiotic use and rescue medication
* Costs of hospitalizations and other secondary care services used
* Cost of primary and community care services used Results from Health
Utilities Index Questionnaire in intervention and placebo control groups to
derive:
* Health status
* Health related quality of life
* Utility scores
* Calculation of quality adjusted life years Determination of
cost-effectiveness ratios for intervention and placebo control groups
* Sensitivity analysis, to assess extent to which variation in parameter
estimates affect cost effectiveness ratios
* Analysis on the extent to which variation in parameters affects results from
the Health Utilities Index Questionnaire
Background summary
Bronchiectasis is a chronic lung condition in which damage to the airways
causes abnormal dilation of one or more bronchi, leading to pooling of mucus in
affected areas. Patients with bronchiectasis usually have cough and abnormal
sputum production, some have wheeze and breathlessness. Undue tiredness and
fatigue are often reported by patients with bronchiectasis. The increased
production of mucus together with impairment of the mucociliary system leads to
mucus accumulation, cough, sputum production and recurrent infections. Patients
with mucociliary dysfunction are usually treated on a daily basis with physical
treatment like postural drainage to help clear excessive secretions and also
with pharmacological agents. However, the physico-chemical properties of the
secretions from these patients are such that the currently available
pharmacological and physical interventions are not very effective.
Inhaled dry powder mannitol is an osmotic agent that was first shown to
increase mucociliary clearance in asthmatic and healthy subjects who have
normal mucociliary clearance at baseline. It has been shown that a single
inhalation of mannitol increases the clearance of mucus both acutely and over
24 hours in patients with bronchiectasis, and acutely in patients with cystic
fibrosis. Clinical outcome studies have shown that inhaled mannitol over 2
weeks improves health related quality of life10 respiratory symptoms and
fatigue, and respiratory symptoms, and daytime sleepiness11 in bronchiectasis
patients. In addition, sputum collected from patients 1 hour post mannitol was
shown to have physical changes that benefit mucus transport.
Study objective
2.1.1 Primary Objective:
To evaluate the difference in the rates of graded pulmonary exacerbations in
patients with bronchiectasis treated with inhaled mannitol compared with
placebo control
2.1.2 Secondary Objectives:
Efficacy
To evaluate the difference in Quality of Life as measured by the St. Georges
Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) in patients with bronchiectasis treated with
inhaled mannitol compared with placebo control
To evaluate the difference in antibiotic use prescribed for treated pulmonary
exacerbations in patients with bronchiectasis treated with inhaled mannitol
compared with placebo control. Such antibiotic use parameters to be analyzed
will include number of discrete courses; days on antibiotics; and time to
antibiotic need.
To evaluate the difference in other graded exacerbation parameters (time to
first exacerbation and duration of exacerbation) in patients with
bronchiectasis treated with inhaled mannitol compared with placebo control
To evaluate the difference in sputum volume in patients with bronchiectasis
treated with inhaled mannitol compared with placebo control
To evaluate the difference in daytime sleepiness scores in patients with
bronchiectasis treated with inhaled mannitol compared with placebo control
To evaluate the difference in lung function (FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, FEF25-75
values) in patients with bronchiectasis treated with inhaled mannitol compared
with placebo control (Exploratory)
To investigate the difference in number of hospitalizations due to pulmonary
exacerbations in patients with bronchiectasis treated with inhaled mannitol
compared with placebo control
Safety
To monitor the safety profile of inhaled mannitol compared with placebo control
in subjects with bronchiectasis by investigating adverse events, airway
reactivity, hematology, clinical chemistry, sputum microbiology and vital signs
Costs, Health Status, Utilities and Cost Effectiveness
To compare health related costs of treating patients with bronchiectasis with
inhaled mannitol and placebo control
To compare health status and utility scores in patients treated with inhaled
mannitol compared with placebo control
To investigate health related quality of life (HRQL) and quality adjusted life
years (QALYs) by treatment group using utility scores from the Health Utilities
Index Questionnaire
To investigate cost effectiveness of treating patients with bronchiectasis with
inhaled mannitol
Study design
This is a double-blind, randomized, parallel group, controlled, multi-center,
interventional clinical trial in subjects with non-CF bronchiectasis.
Eligibility will be determined at Visit 0A & Visit 0B, and baseline assessments
captured at Visit 0B prior to the mannitol tolerance test (MTT). Subjects must
have a negative MTT result to be randomized. Randomized subjects will receive
for 52 weeks, 400 mg BID inhaled mannitol or placebo control, in a ratio of
1:1. All subjects will be followed for 4 weeks following cessation of the
intervention arm.
Intervention
Dose: 400mg inhaled mannitol BID or placebo control BID
Study burden and risks
See protocol: Time and Events schedule, p89 and section 'Known potential risks
and benifits to human subjects', p16.
Unit 20 Rodborough
2086 French Forest NSW
AU
Unit 20 Rodborough
2086 French Forest NSW
AU
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
1. Have given a written informed consent to participate in this study in accordance with local regulations
2. Confirmed diagnosis of (non-cystic fibrosis) bronchiectasis (diagnosed by CT, HRCT, or bronchogram)
3. Aged 18*85 years, male and female
4. FEV1 >40 and *85 % predicted and > 1.0L
5. Clinician documented history of at least 2 pulmonary exacerbations, each requiring antibiotic therapy, in the last 12 months prior to Visit 0A and a total of at least 4 in the last 2 years prior to Visit 0A
6. Total SGRQ score of *30 at Visit 0B
7. 24 hour sputum weight *10g at Visit 0B
Exclusion criteria
1. Have bronchiectasis as a consequence of cystic fibrosis or focal endobronchial lesion or otherwise curable causes (e.g. foreign body aspiration)
2. Be considered *terminally ill* or listed for transplantation
3. Be using hypertonic saline in the 14 days prior to commencing Visit 0B or thereafter at any time during the study
4. Have had rescue antibiotics in the 4 weeks prior to V0B (chronic background antibiotic therapy accepted)
5. Have smoked within the last 3 months and must not smoke during their participation in the study
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EudraCT | EUCTR2008-008731-28-NL |
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT00669331 |
CCMO | NL33986.096.10 |