Investigate whether critical thinking of people with executive function deficits as a result of brain damage can improve by VTS.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Structural brain disorders
- Cognitive and attention disorders and disturbances
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Both in describing a painting (Aesthetic Development Interview, ADI) and in
describing an unknown object (Material Object Interview, MOI): the number of
different observations, the number of times that there are different
observations (interpretations) about the same thing, the number of times that
an observation is corrected, the number of observations that are based by the
patient on evidence from the painting.
Secondary outcome
finding different solutions (Wordfluency and Design fluency) and critical
thinking and reasoning logically (WAIS-III picture sequencing and
Comprehension) and a questionnaire for social communicative skills (filled in
by both he patient and a proxy).
Background summary
Many people with chronic acquired brain injury suffer from executive function
deficits. They may be impulsive, have difficulty with initiating actions or
finding different solutions, or draw conclusions that are not supported by the
facts. Treatments for people with executive function deficits mainly aim at
teaching strategies to make plans, solve problems and keep working purposeful.
There is some evidence that this apporach leads to improvement on a practical
executive function task and on a questionnaire filled in by a proxy (Miotto
e.a. 2009)
Visual Thinking Strategies (VTS) is originally a method to teach children with
little experience with art to look at art longer and more intensive, in order
to improve esthetical growth. There is some evidence that VTS can improve
critical thinking in children, also in domains other than art (Housen, 2002)
and that VTS makes medical students observe their patients more critically
during assessment (Naghshineh et al. 2008).
René ter Horst, psychologist in Rehabilitationcenter Amsterdam (RCA),
Department Acquired Brain Injury, wondered whether this method would improve
critical thinking in people who have a deficit in this area as a result of
brain damage. VTS was tried out as small part of a broader cognitive
rehabilitation program and seamed effective, but as it was not given in
isolation, its effect was difficult to investigate.
Study objective
Investigate whether critical thinking of people with executive function
deficits as a result of brain damage can improve by VTS.
Study design
Cross-over design. There are two groups. One group is treated with VTS while
the second group has no treatment. Subsequently the second group is treated
with VTS and the first group has no treatment. Patients are assigned to one of
the groups at random.
Intervention
VTS. Participants look at an object of art. They are asked three questions.
First they are asked: "What do you see on this painting?" Next: "You say (...),
what makes you say that?" And last: "What else can we find?" This way
participants learn to take time before responding and to base their
observations on evidence. As VTS is given in a group and participants observe
the paintings in different ways, they are thaught that more than one answer is
correct.
Study burden and risks
There are no risks attached to the treatment or the assessments. The
participant is asked to come to the rehabilitation center three times for
assessments (each time about one hour to one and a half hour) as well as for
treatment. Treatment involves four weeks twice a week a one hour treatment
session (i.e. eight treatment sessions in total).
Overtoom 283
1054 H W Amsterdam
Nederland
Overtoom 283
1054 H W Amsterdam
Nederland
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
acquired brain injury
at least one year post onset
executive function deficits
age 18-65
Exclusion criteria
serious visual or hearing deficits
serious cognitive (eg. attention deficit) or behavioural deficits interfering with groupparticipation
speaking and understanding Dutch insufficiently
other cognitive rehabilitation at the same time as the intervention
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL32038.048.10 |