We propose a randomized controlled study to investigate the effectiveness of the intervention. Secondly, a comprehensive process evaluation will be conducted to validate the effectiveness of the intervention and to facilitate future implementation.…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
Synonym
Health condition
frailty, disability
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary outcome measure is the Groningen Activity and Restriction Scale
(GARS). The GARS is a reliable and valid measure for assessing disability in
the domains of ADL, IADL and mobility in an elderly population.
Secondary outcome
As the proposed study will be embedded in the NPO, the MDS (Minimal Data Set)
will be applied. The MDS provides global data on: age, gender, marital status,
ethnicity, living arrangements, socio-economic status, level of education,
health perception, multimorbidity, daily functioning in ADL, mental well-being,
cognitive functioning, social functioning and quality of life. Data about the
impact of the intervention on informal caregivers (perceived burden and
health-related quality of life) will also be provided. Additional outcomes
(secondary outcomes) are anxiety, depression, cognitive status, social support,
hours which are spend on activities, feelings of loneliness, frequency of falls
and fear of falling. Mortality, health care utilization/consumed goods and
related costs will be also registered.
Background summary
Depending on the definition of frailty up to 40% of the Dutch elderly
population is frail and an increase in the number of frail elderly is expected.
Frail elderly are more vulnerable for adverse health outcomes such as acute and
chronic diseases, and disability. Disability is a relevant health problem,
because it is associated with a loss of independency in carrying out essential
tasks and roles needed for self-care and independent living. Participation in
meaningful activities that is related to one*s quality of life is limited. In
addition, disability is associated with a higher risk for mortality,
hospitalization, long-term care and related costs. The number of disabled older
people is expected to triple until 2050. Therefore, an intervention for
delaying or preventing disability is highly relevant in community-dwelling
frail elderly. However, evidence about effective interventions is limited.
Study objective
We propose a randomized controlled study to investigate the effectiveness of
the intervention. Secondly, a comprehensive process evaluation will be
conducted to validate the effectiveness of the intervention and to facilitate
future implementation. We will study the content of the program, the
performance according to protocol and the compliance with the intervention.
Thirdly, data on health care utilization and consumed goods are collected to
determine the cost-effectiveness of the intervention.
Study design
In the study 420 community-dwelling frail elderly (70 years or older) and their
informal caregivers will be included through a screening of 70+ elderly in
twelve GP practices in the region of the Westelijke Mijnstreek. Based on a
randomization on practice level, six practices (=210 participants) receive the
new intervention as part of the NPO transition project (intervention group) and
six practices (=210 participants) receive care as usual (control group).
Assuming that 80% of frail elderly has a central informal caregiver, who will
also be included in the study, 340 informal cargivers will be added resulting
in a total sample size of 760. Data for the effectiveness evaluation will be
measured at 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. Therefore a combination of
telephone interviews, postal questionnaires and registries from health
insurance, general practitioners and hospitals will be used.
Intervention
The focus of the intervention is on disability prevention. It is a tailor-made
and multidisciplinary intervention that consists of six steps. After an initial
postal screening (step 1) of frail older people (GFI * 5) a comprehensive
multidimensional assessment (step 2) will be done by a practice nurse in
collaboration with the general practitioner (GP). The assessment phase focuses
on the identification of existing limitations in daily life and on risk factors
for future limitations (e.g. polypharmacy, mobility, falls, lack of social and
productive activities, cognitive impairments). Practice nurse and GP determine
if additional assessment is needed for example by means of the GP,
physiotherapist or other specialist from the first and second echelon. After
the assessment, the practice nurse and GP formulate an interim action plan
(step 3). In case of complex problems clients can be discussed in a
multidisciplinary team (practice nurse, GP, physiotherapist and occupational
therapist). Consequently, a meeting between the practice nurse and the client
(and informal caregiver) takes place to define a definitive action plan,
including goals, strategies and actions (step 4). The action plan can be
related to a toolbox of interventions, which will be executed by the
multidisciplinary team (step 5). During executing and after finishing the
components of the toolbox, the practice nurse and the client evaluate the
achievement of goals, the implementation of strategies into daily life and the
need for support in the following period (step 6).
Study burden and risks
Intervention participants (n=210) receive in the beginning two home visits by a
practice nurse (2x 60 minutes). Consequently, participants receive a
tailor-made intervention which is related to a toolbox of interventions.
Interventions participants can follow several parts of the toolbox. Each part
takes round about 5-10 hours. The burden of receiving the intervention can vary
a lot among participants, depending on the tailor-made nature of the
intervention. A total length of 4-6 months can be expected.
For research purposes all participants (intervention and control group, n=420)
have to fill in a short screeningslist at the start. For the effect evaluation
a postal questionnaire (ca. 30 minutes) has to be filled in at 4 moments in
time and participants will be called four times for a telephone interview (35
min). Postal questionnaires and telephone interviews will be spread over a
period of two years. At the end of the intervention, intervention participants
will be asked to fill in a short questionnaire for the process evaluation (ca.
10 minutes). In addition several participants will be visited for a short
interview (30 min).
Central informal caregivers (n=340) have to fill in a short questionnaire (ca.
30 minutes) at 4 moments in time spread over a period of two years.
Universiteitssingel 40
6229 ER Maastricht
NL
Universiteitssingel 40
6229 ER Maastricht
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
- community-dwelling
- age: 70 years and over
- frailty: moderate to severely frail (a GFI score of at least 5)
Exclusion criteria
- those on a waiting list for admission to a nursing home
- cognitive impairments (TICS < 16)
- unable to communicate in Dutch
- confined to bed
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
ISRCTN | ISRCTN31954692 |
CCMO | NL30037.068.09 |