The objective of the study is to answer the following questions:a) Does the PLS-strategy improve pitch- and speech-perception?b) How does the number of harmonics in consecutive channels influence frequency discrimination, in speech coding strategies…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Hearing disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The study endpoints are:
a) The difference in performance between PLS and the existing HiRes-strategy in
pitch and speech perception.
b) The influence of the number of harmonics at consecutive channels on the just
noticeable difference in frequency in HiRes and PLS.
c) Loudness perception in HiRes and PLS.
Secondary outcome
-
Background summary
Cochlear implantation is the primary treatment for bilateral severe hearing
loss or deafness. A cochlear implant provides hearing through direct electrical
stimulation of the cochlear nerve. There are over 1800 cochlear implant users
in the Netherlands. Although their speech perception in quiet situations is
reasonable, pitch perception, music appreciation, intonation recognition as
well as voice recognition are still poor. Multiple reasons presumably
contribute to this poor performance. One of the reasons is that it is unlikely
that only around 20 electrodes in the watery perilymph in the inner ear fully
take over the functionality of around 13,000 finely tuned normally-functioning
sensory hair cells. Another reason are the limitations of the current sound
processings strategy of cochlear implants. Whereas normal hearing uses
tonotopic as well as temporal cues for the determination of pitch, most
cochlear implants provide only the tonotopic cues. The electrical stimulation
patterns provided by the implant do not contain fine-structured temporal
information.
Study objective
The objective of the study is to answer the following questions:
a) Does the PLS-strategy improve pitch- and speech-perception?
b) How does the number of harmonics in consecutive channels influence frequency
discrimination, in speech coding strategies HiRes and PLS?
Study design
Psychophysical hearing tests, intraparticipant comparison, evaluation after 10
participants.
Intervention
Psychophysical experiments: Loudness scaling test; frequency discrimination
test; speech perception test (in silence and noise).
Study burden and risks
The participants will spend a total of 10 hours (distributed over 2 visits)
performing the following psychophysical experiments: Loudness scaling test;
pitch discrimination test; speech recognition test.
The burden is that participants may find the experiments difficult and tiring.
There are no known risks associated with the experiments.
The benefit for the patient group as a whole is that if the PLS-strategy proves
useful, it can be applied in software upgrades of their regular sound
processor. It may resolve one of the primary complaints of current implant
users: poor speech perception in noise. Furthermore, knowledge about pitch
perception using temporal cues will help the field to develop better
strategies. There is no immediate benefit for the individual test subject.
Hanzeplein 1
9713 GZ Groningen
NL
Hanzeplein 1
9713 GZ Groningen
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
- >18 years
- Advanced Bionics cochlear implant users
Exclusion criteria
Unability to cooperate in the experiments
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL17057.042.09 |