To test the feasibility of the ANACONDA endograft for the endovascular repair of juxta and suprarenal AAA.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Vascular therapeutic procedures
- Aneurysms and artery dissections
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Feasibility of the fenestrated ANACONDA endograft for juxta and suprarenal
aortic aneurysms:
1. Technical success (i.e. exclsuion of the aneurysm; see protocol for more
information)
2. Patency of the endograft and stents
3. Endoleak
4. Migration of the endograft
Secondary outcome
1. Renal and mesenteric function
2. Reintervention
3. cardiopulmonary complications
4. mortality
Background summary
Abdominal aortic aneurysm is conventionally repaired by open surgery using a
prosthetic graft. This method of repair involves laparotomy and cross-clamping
of the aorta and has a mortality rate of 5 % (Zarins et al, 1997, EVAR 1, 2005;
EVAR 2 ,2005; DREAM, 2005). In addition the procedure is associated with a
complication rate of 15-37% including significant blood loss, infection and a
prolonged anaesthetic time. (White et al, 1996). Endovascular aneurysm repair
offers potential benefits including reduced operative time, reduced blood loss,
decreased post-operative intensive care (Politz et al 2000) and increased 4
years survival compared to open repair (EVAR 1). This is especially the case in
relatively healthy patients (EVAR 1, 2005 and EVAR 2, 2005). All these studies
only studies endovascular repair in infrarenal AAA.
Since the first report of a juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)
endovascularly treated with a fenestrated stent graft in 1999,1 a number of
published series have demonstrated excellent early and mid-term results of the
technique (Greenberg 2004, Ziegler 2007, Verhoeven 2010). A recently published
systematic review confirms the potential lower perioperative mortality of the
technique in comparison with open repair (nordon 2009). Fenestrated stent
grafts are now commercially available and provide an alternative to open
surgery, especially in patients who are at increased risk for open repair.
Study objective
To test the feasibility of the ANACONDA endograft for the endovascular repair
of juxta and suprarenal AAA.
Study design
Prospective feasibility study in approximately 20 patients
Inclusion period of 2-4 years (in order to include at least 20 patients)
Follow-up as current standard for AAA (life long) with analysis at 2 and 4
years of follow-up (not including the interim analysis; see protocol)
Intervention
ANACONDA fenestrated endograft.
The operation will be performed under local, epidural or general anaesthetic in
the operating theatre at the discretion of the surgeon based on individual
patient status. The patient will be positioned and prepared as for conventional
open surgery. All the implants will be performed by a team of vascular surgeons
and interventional radiologists with an EVAR experience of at least 100
implants and supervised by vascular surgeons or interventional radiologist
(proctor) with a comparable EVAR experience including at least 10 ANACONDA
endografts.
The procedure will require surgical exposure of the Femoral Arteries or Common
Iliac Arteries and will be performed by surgical cut down and formation of an
arteriotomy. During the procedure intravenous Heparin 5,000 IU or 100 IU
heparin/kg bodyweight will be required for anti-coagulation therapy in
accordance with standard endovascular procedures.
Digital subtraction angiography device will be used throughout the operation.
A final contrast enhanced high pressure Aortogram will be performed to assess
success of aneurysm exclusion.
The surgical technique must be carried out in accordance with the Vascutek
Limited instructions for use.
Study burden and risks
Burden and risks are as follows: no exclusion of the aneurysm wich may need
extra endovascular treatment during the primary intervention or during
follow-up. Conversion to open repair if endovascular repair is not possible
whcih may lead to the known risks of open repair. The presence of an endograft
does not mean per se that the open rapair will be more difficult or hazardous.
During stenting of the renal or meseteric arteries, damage may occur to these
vessels which may need further treatment, usually endovascular. This may lead
to a deterioration in kidney function. The risk for other complications, i.e.
cardiac and infections, is lower compared to the open procedure.
Haaksbergerstraat 55
7513 ER Enschede
NL
Haaksbergerstraat 55
7513 ER Enschede
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
• Patients aged 18 years - 90 Years
* Patient willing and available to comply with follow up requirements
* Patient can comply with instructions and give informed consent
* Life Expectancy > 2 Years
* AAA > 55 mm in diameter
* Suprarenal proximal neck diameter 18 - 31.5mm
* Inadequate infrarenal aortic neck sealing zone
* Distal Iliac fixation site diameter < =17 mm
* Distal Iliac fixation site >= 20 mm in length.
* Access vessels: Appropriate anatomy, at the physicians discretion, for access vessel suitability
* Aortic neck angulation <= 90 degrees.
Exclusion criteria
Ruptured AAA
* Presence of serious concomitant medical disease or infection
* Low operative risk for open repair
* Known allergy to contrast medium, nitinol or polyester
* Connective tissue disease
* ASA Grade IV or V
* Need for surgical reconstruction of other visceral arteries or inability to place stent in visceralartery
* Presence of > 50% continuous calcification of proximal neck
* Presence of > 50% thrombus in proximal neck
* Other unsuitable anatomy
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
Other | ned. trialregister tc 2842 |
CCMO | NL35540.044.11 |