The key objectives of the study are:(1) to assess the effect on the quality of client-caregiver interaction by a treatment protocol designed around a specially developed mobile device. Moreover, attention will also be given to differentiation among…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Anxiety disorders and symptoms
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
All messages sent by the client and the caregivers will be registered on a
webbased computerized data collection system. The kind of emotional message
sent and the frequency of these in the different phases of the research will be
used to examine the increasing quality of client-caregiver interaction and
differentiation among caregivers.
Secondary outcome
Outcome variables: Instruments
First it is important to note that although quite a variety of instruments are
mentioned, caregivers will only be asked to fill out the items that are of
concern to this study. Secondly, the care organizations which employ caregivers
will receive compensatory funding for the time they need for completing the
questionnaires. The client*s mentor will be asked to answer the questionnaires.
An independent caregiver will support the client in completing some of the
questionnaires.
Outcome variables: Separation distress, loneliness & challenging behaviour
- The Psychopathology Inventory for Mentally Retarded Adults (PIMRA) (Matson,
Van Minnen & Hoogduin, 1994): It is one of the most widely administered and
researched instruments in assessing psychopathology in individuals with
developmental disabilities. This scale consists of 56 true/false items within
eight subscales: Schizophrenia, Affective Disorder, Psychosexual Disorder,
Adjustment Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Somatoform Disorder, Personality
Disorder, and Inappropriate Adjustment. The psychometric properties have been
widely studied and suggest that overall it is a reliable and valid screening
measure of psychopathology in persons with ID. Only the 7 items on *anxiety
disorder* will be used with a scoring time of approximately 3 minutes.
- The health of the nation outcome scales learning disabilities (Honos-LD)
(Roy, Matthews, Clifford,
Fowler & Martin, 2002) will be used to measure risk and vulnerability of mental
health problems
that suits the needs of people with learning disabilities. Only item 3D
(Anxiety, phobias, obsessive
or compulsive behavior) will be used with a scoring time of approximately 1
minute.
- Sociale redzaamheidschalen verstandelijk gehandicapten (SRZ/SRZi). SRZ/SRZi
Social ability scales for people with ID (Kraijer, Kema, & Bildt, 2004): The
SRZ has a Cohen*s kappa for reliability of between r = .66 and .89 and adequate
validity. Only the 5 items on *social functioning* will be used with a scoring
time of approximately 2 minutes.
- The Dutch version of the Adult Behavior Checklist (ABCL) for the ages 18 to
59 (Achenbach & Rescorla, 2003): scales for adaptive functioning, empirically
based syndromes, substance use, internalising, externalising, and total
problems. There are six scales to gain characteristics consistent with DSM-IV
categories: Depressive Problems, Anxiety Problems, Somatic Problems, Avoidant
Personality Problems, Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Problems, and Antisocial
Personality Problems. The ABCL was found to be a reliable and valid measure to
assess psychopathology in persons with mild intellectual disabilities or low
IQ, admitted for treatment in facilities for adults with mild intellectual
disability and severe challenging behaviour (Tenneij & Koot,2007). The observer
rating scale will be used with a scoring time between 5 and 20 minutes.
-Residential observation: The professional caregivers in the participants'
residential homes will be instructed to record the frequency of the challenging
behaviours (e.g. distress, behavioural problems, clamping behaviour). An online
web-based computerized data collection system *Thesis Tools*, will be used for
the daily reporting of challenging behaviour. A computerized reminder for
filling out the lists will be added and will be visible on the computer on
which caregivers daily check their e-mail. The daily scoring time will take
around 5 minutes. An earlier study with a paper and pencil version achieved
responses rates of 100% over periods of 9 to 12 months of daily scoring
(Sterkenburg et al., 2008).
-The Symptom Checklist-90-R SCL-90-R is a questionnaire frequently used as an
instrument to determine the experienced degree of psychopathology and for the
evaluation of treatment. The reliability and validity of the instrument is
described as good (COTAN evaluation) (Arrindell & Ettema, 2003). The items are
divided in eight scales: Fear, Agoraphobia, Depression, Somatic complaints,
Insufficient way of thinking and reacting, Suspicion and interpersonal
sensitivity, Anger-hostility, and Sleeping problems. The shortened version, the
Brief Symptom Index (BSI) (De Beurs & Zitman, 2005) often used to measure
therapy effect, will be used. The 53 item list will be scored by the client
assisted by an independent researcher. The BSI is a easy to score list with a
duration of approximately 15 minutes.
Outcome variable: feeling of well-being
- The IDQOL Intellectual Disability Quality of Life (Hoekman et al. 2001) is a
short questionnaire (quickscan) to examine the quality of life of persons with
a moderate to mild intellectual disability. The 16-item questionnaire with its
5-point scale (using smileys) has a Cronbach*s Alpha for internal consistency
of between .72 and .86. The items cover the range from personal well-being,
social well-being and well-being in the caregiving situation. It will take
between 5 and 20 minutes to complete the questionnaire. An independent
caregiver will support the client.
Background summary
Experiencing separation anxiety is a normal reaction for persons with a
developmental age between 0 and 48 months. For these persons anticipating the
return of a loved person and the ability to imagine the whereabouts of the
missing person is difficult. For persons with a visual and intellectual
disability (ID) this may be even more difficult. Prevalence studies indicate
that separation anxiety among children with ID is four times higher than among
their non-ID peers. For persons with a visual disability and ID the prevalence
of separation anxiety disorder is unknown. However, anxiety symptoms are
widespread: in 30% of the cases anxiety and fear were reasons to apply for
treatment at the Psychotherapy department of Bartiméus. Furthermore, research
among children and adolescents has indicated that anxiety disorders do not
spontaneously disappear and can cause comorbid disorders such as depression and
behaviour problems. Consequently this may lessen their possibilities of
integration in community and decreases independent citizenship. Hardly any
research has been done on the treatment of separation anxiety among persons
with a visual disability and ID. In order to overcome separation anxiety,
persons with visual and intellectual disabilities may be given the experience
that their caregivers continue to exist and keep their client in their minds,
even when they are separated in space and time. Mobile technology offers new
ways of treating separation anxiety and isolation. However, research on the use
of mobile technology in the intervention of separation anxiety of persons with
a visual disability and ID is lacking.
Study objective
The key objectives of the study are:
(1) to assess the effect on the quality of client-caregiver interaction by a
treatment protocol designed around a specially developed mobile device.
Moreover, attention will also be given to differentiation among different
caregivers.
(2) to assess the effect of the treatment protocol on the client. Endpoints
are: reduced separation distress; reduced signs of loneliness; reduced
challenging behaviour; increased well-being.
(3) to assess the social validity of treatment with mobile technology. Can
mobile technology be used while providing care to another client? Does mobile
technology for the client lead to less, not more signals of distress?
Study design
A series of single case studies with a multiphase design (ABCBC) with a
three-week post-intervention check will be used.
Intervention
A treatment protocol that is designed around a specially developed mobile
device (an adapted iPhone Touch).
Study burden and risks
Although the burden of participation is expected to be negligible, clients may
experience the mobile device as troublesome. Efforts will be made to reduce
this to a minimum.
Van der Boechorststraat 1
1081BT Amsterdam
NL
Van der Boechorststraat 1
1081BT Amsterdam
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Criteria for participation in this study are: being at least 18 years of age; having a visual disability in accordance to WHO criteria (blind persons are excluded); having an IQ between 40 and 70 (moderate to mild) acquired their disability before adulthood; regularly becoming distressed when left alone as shown on the PIMRA (see instruments); the capacity to physically use the touch-screen of the mobile device.
Exclusion criteria
Adults with the diagnoses Autism Spectrum Disorder will be excluded from this study as well as persons who are deaf.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL33646.029.11 |