Part 1: Primary objective 1: Will OCD patients experience dissociative feelings during clinical perseveration?Part 2: Primary objective 2: Will OCD patients report more dissociative uncertainty after perseveratively repeating words than healthy…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Anxiety disorders and symptoms
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
First part: The main study parameters are the ratings of dissociative
uncertainty of OCD patients after clinical perseveration or after
non-perseverative behaviour.
Second part: The main study parameters are the participants* ratings of
dissociative uncertainty, the intolerance of dissociative uncertainty and the
degree of semantic satiation after perseveratively and non-perseveratively
repeating words. Semantic satiation will be determined by measuring reaction
times in the relatedness decision task.
Secondary outcome
nvt
Background summary
Individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) exhibit perseverative
behaviours, like checking, to reduce uncertainty, but perseveration
paradoxically enhances uncertainty. The crucial question is how perseveration
breeds dissociative uncertainty. Findings on inhibition of *spreading of
activation* may be relevant. When a stimulus (e.g. apple) is processed,
semantically-related concepts (e.g. banana) become more accessible. However,
when a stimulus is repeatedly processed, spreading of activation is disrupted.
This leads to semantic satiation; the accessibility of semantically related
stimuli is diminished. OC-like repetitive behaviour (like checking) may also
interfere with spreading of activation of semantic related concepts, thereby
reducing access to the meaning of that behaviour. This may result in the
ambivalent uncertainty experienced by OCD patients (e.g., *I can see the switch
is off, but it feels fuzzy and unreal*). In a former study was found that when
healthy participants engaged in perseverative checking, semantic satiation was
induced and they experienced dissociative uncertainty. The present study will
further examine these effects of perseveration in patients with OCD. The first
part of the study aims to determine the effects of real-life clinical
perseverative behaviour on dissociative uncertainty in OCD patients. In the
second part of the study, OCD patients and matched controls will participate in
a perseveration task. In this study will be investigated whether OCD patients
report more dissociative uncertainty and display a higher level of semantic
satiation after perseveratively repeating words than healthy controls.
Moreover, we want to study whether OCD patients differ from healthy controls
with respect to their intolerance of this dissociative uncertainty.
Study objective
Part 1:
Primary objective 1: Will OCD patients experience dissociative feelings during
clinical perseveration?
Part 2:
Primary objective 2: Will OCD patients report more dissociative uncertainty
after perseveratively repeating words than healthy controls? Primary objective
3: Will OCD patients display a higher level of semantic satiation after
perseveratively repeating words than healthy controls? Primary objective 4: Are
speed of relatedness judgements and feelings of dissociative uncertainty
positively correlated? Primary objective 5: If dissociative uncertainty occurs,
will OCD patients differ from healthy controls with respect to their
intolerance of this dissociative uncertainty?
Part 1 and Part 2: Primary objective 6: Are the levels of dissociative
uncertainty that are reported by OCD patients in the first part (after clinical
perseveration) and the second part (after perseveratively repeating words)
positively correlated?
Study design
Part 1: Within subjects design, with one independent variable: Condition
(perseveration/non perseveration).
Part 2: Experimental mixed within-between subjects design, with three
independent variables: Condition (perseveration/non perseveration), Relatedness
(words related/words unrelated) and Group (OCD patients/ healthy controls).
Intervention
nvt
Study burden and risks
Participation in this study will not put the participant at risk for any harm
or danger. This study will consist of a set of questionnaires which
participants have to fill out at the laboratory and will take approximately 35
minutes, a questionnaire which participants have to fill out at home and
participants will be asked to participate in a task in which they have to
repeat words and have to respond to harmless tones. Benefits of the studies are
that it can provide new insight into the possible mechanisms by which OCD is
maintained; how compulsive perseveration leads to a vicious circle of doubt and
dissociation. The findings may add to the theoretical rationale for current
treatments in OCD, like Exposure and Response Prevention.
Heidelberglaan 1
Utrecht 3508 TC
NL
Heidelberglaan 1
Utrecht 3508 TC
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Patients will be included when they have a DSM-IV diagnosis of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. Patients are allowed to use SSRI drugs, the use of SSRI's will be controlled for in the analysis.
Healthy controls will be age/education matched with the patients included in the study.
Exclusion criteria
Subjects will be excluded if they are insufficiently proficient in the Dutch language, and/or if they are addicted to alcohol or drugs; and/or if they are under 18 years of age; and/or if they present symtoms form the psychotic spectrum. Patients who use benzodiazepine drugs will be excluded.
Healthy controls will also be excluded when they have any current psychiatric disorder
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL40786.041.12 |