To test in a prospective study the feasibility and outcome of low dose rate I-125 seed brachytherapy to treat early low risk prostate cancer in patients who have had previous TURP using specific recommendations on target and organs at risk doseā¦
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Reproductive and genitourinary neoplasms gender unspecified NEC
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Acute and late urinary toxicity defined by IPSS and CTCAEv4
Secondary outcome
- Gastro-intestinal and sexual function
- Biochemical disease free survival (Phoenix-definition).
- Incidence of seed loss at 1month and 6 months after implant
Background summary
Low dose rate I-125 seed brachytherapy is an established treatment for
localised low risk prostate cancer. Both the ABS recommendations on permanent
seed implant and the GEC-ESTRO guidelines consider prior TURp (Transurethral
Resection of the prostate) a (relative) contra-indication for prostate
permanent seed brachytherapy. In a lot of, even experienced, brachytherapy
centres, the history of endoscopic resection of the prostate soon became an
absolute contra-indication for prostate brachytherapy. The small number of
publications on this item confirms this hypothesis. These recommendations were
principally based on an early report from the Seattle group, describing their
initial experience and reporting a major risk of significant toxicity,
primarily urinary incontinence, in brachytherapy patients who had undergone
prior TURp. However, much of this data originated from patients treated with
early dosimetry planning systems and homogeneous loading of the radioactive
isotopes when imaging and dosimetry was not well developed and the experience
didn*t assess large patient samples.
With more extensive experience in the field of prostate brachytherapy, the
optimization of imaging techniques and improved loading and dosimetry
techniques, there is little doubt that the complication rate in this group of
patients has also considerably decreased. More recent reports dealing with this
specific item suggest that brachytherapy can be safely performed in a TURp
patient group on condition that modern imaging and optimized dosimetry
techniques are used. Unfortunately, experience remains limited; reports are few
and deal with small patient groups.
Study objective
To test in a prospective study the feasibility and outcome of low dose rate
I-125 seed brachytherapy to treat early low risk prostate cancer in patients
who have had previous TURP using specific recommendations on target and organs
at risk dose parameters.
Study design
This study is designed as a prospective phase II study. Stopping rules are
defined to stop the study if toxicity exceed what is expected.
Intervention
Brachytherapy with I-125 sources
Study burden and risks
I-125 implants are performed with a 1-day hospitalization. This procedure has
proven to be very efficacious with a survival rate over 90% for low-risk
prostate cancer. In contrast, external beam radiotherapy can last 7 weeks.
Complaints that can follow an implant are due to obstructive and iritative
changes. Because of the experimental design of the study there is a possibility
of increased toxicity.
Av Mounierlaan 83
Brussel 1200
NL
Av Mounierlaan 83
Brussel 1200
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
-Histologically proven prostate cancer (adenocarcinoma) of low or intermediate risk following the D*Amico classification.
-Prostate volume < 50 cc
-History of TransUrethral Resection of the prostate (TURp), performed at least 3 months before the brachytherapy procedure.
-Rim of prostate tissue of at least 1 cm around the post-TURp urethral defect at thepostero-lateral sides of the prostate
-Absence of significant TURP-induced urinary incontinence
- IPSS <15
Exclusion criteria
-Locally advanced (stage T3 or T4 , or metastatic (stage N+ or M+) prostate cancer
-High grade tumours defined by Gleason score 8 or above
-Co-morbidity which would exclude the patient from a transperineal implant procedure.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
Other | LTHT R & D: CO11/9837 |
CCMO | NL40917.018.12 |