We expect that in people with multiple sclerosis the processing of energy substances such as sugars (energy metabolism)i n the brains is not optimal . In our view this could explain the progressive deterioration of the disease. Currently there areā¦
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Autoimmune disorders
- Demyelinating disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW),
9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT)
Secondary outcome
MRI: diffusion tensor imaging, global brain atrophy and T2 lesion load.
Cognition: MACFIMS, BDI, MFIS, HAI
Ambulation: Ambulation Index
Background summary
Based on the hypothesis that fluoxetine might suppress the antigen-presenting
capacity of glial cells we performed a pilot study in patients with relapsing
remitting MS and found that a daily dose of 20 mg tended to reduce the
formation of new inflammatory lesions.
The progressive phase of MS reflects a poorly understood insidious axonal
degeneration that is age related and independent of relapses. Currently
available disease-modifying treatments, which act by modifying the immune
response, are ineffective in progressive MS.
A mechanisms suspected to be involved in the widespread axonal degeneration in
MS is a reduced axonal energy metabolism and axonal glutamate toxicity.Proton
magnetic resonance spectroscopy has shown reduced levels of N-acetyl aspartate
(NAA), which is a marker of axonal mitochondrial metabolism, and enhanced
levels of glutamate 7 throughout the normal appearing white matter of the brain
in MS patients.
Astrocytes in MS are deficient in beta2 adrenergic receptors that are involved
in (1) the release of brain derived neurotrophic factor, and (2) astrocytic
glycogenolysis necessary for maintenance of sodium-dependent glutamate uptake,
and the release of lactate, which is an energy source for axons.
Fluoxetine might reduce axonal loss underlying the progressive phase of MS
because it stimulates glycogenolysis with lactate release and it enhances the
production of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in rodent astrocyte cultures.
We found that 2 weeks of treatment with fluoxetine (first week 20 mg/day and
second week 40 mg/day) significantly improved the cerebral white matter
NAA/creatine ratio, suggesting an improvement in axonal mitochondrial energy
metabolism.
Study objective
We expect that in people with multiple sclerosis the processing of energy
substances such as sugars (energy metabolism)i n the brains is not optimal . In
our view this could explain the progressive deterioration of the disease.
Currently there are several therapeutic options for multiple sclerosis in which
there are surges (so-called relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis). For the
progressive forms without flares (so-called 'primary and secondary progressive
multiple sclerosis'), there is no treatment that slows the progression.
If we could improve the energy metabolism by administering medication, we
expect that this is a new way that might slow down the progressive
deterioration of multiple sclerosis.
A number of times fluoxetine has been shown to improve this chemical energy
metabolism in multiple sclerosis. With the present study, we will examine
whether this also leads to long term slowing of the progressive phase.
Study design
randomized double blind, placebo-controlled study
Intervention
fluoxetine
placebo
Study burden and risks
Fluoxetine is a drug that used for over 20 years for the treatment of
depression. However, the body of evidence that fluoxetine could have protective
effects on nerve cellsis growing. As with all medication use, there is a risk
of side effects, but these are well known and usually minor. Most common side
effects include gastrointestinal symptoms, drowsiness and sleepiness at the
beginning of treatment, decreased libido, headache. The MRI brains hold no
radiation burden. There is also no use of radioactive materials or contrast
media.
It is possible that the study medication slows down the pathology of multiple
sclerosis and could therefore be an advantage , but because this that
advantage may not be guaranteed. For patients in the placebo group there is no
direct effect on the expected disease course.
Campus Jette, Laarbeeklaan 101
Brussel 1090
BE
Campus Jette, Laarbeeklaan 101
Brussel 1090
BE
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
1.Signed written informed consent.
2.Either secondary or primary progressive MS according to the 2005 Revised McDonald criteria.
3.Age 25-65 years.
4.EDSS at baseline of 3 - 6.5 points inclusive. Disability increased in the preceding year because of steady disease progression unrelated to relapses for at least 12 months.
5.Ability to be compliant with the schedule of protocol assessments.
6.For sexually active female patients with reproductive potential, use of reliable means of contraception.
Exclusion criteria
1.Pregnancy or lactation
2.Allergy to fluoxetine
3.Use of fluoxetine
4.Use of other antidepressants, unless they can be stopped for 2 months before starting with the study medication.
5.Contraindication for MRI (relative exclusion criterion because patients who have a contraindication are allowed to participate).
6.Major depression following the DSM-IV
7.Other neurologic, serious psychiatric or systemic disorders that could interfere with the assessments.
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
Other | 2011-003775-11 bij FAGG AFMPS |
EudraCT | EUCTR2011-003775-11-NL |
CCMO | NL40106.091.12 |