The primary objective of this study is to determine (differences in) patient satisfaction with pain relief and pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale) using a step 1 vs. a step 2 based analgesic regimen.The secondary objective is to determine…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
- Fractures
- Bone and joint therapeutic procedures
Synonym
Health condition
pijn
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The main study parameters are the outcomes of the pain/satisfaction Numeric
Rating Scale.
Secondary outcome
The secondary study parameters are the outcomes of the self-efficacy scale and
the disability questionnaire.
Background summary
Fracture patients are prescribed a spectrum of analgesics to reduce pain. The
conscious understanding of this pain may be altered by a variety of factors,
including psychosocial factors. This could explain the apparent differences in
prescription habits for analgesic drugs, between American and Dutch orthopaedic
surgeons. There is currently no official post-operative protocol for
pain-management after extremity fractures. The large differences between the
two countries emphasize how much there is to learn in this area of
investigation.
In this project we will study the effects of two different frequently used
analgesic regimens on pain relief, satisfaction with pain relief, and
disability after skeletal trauma. This study will compare a step
1-(acetaminophen (paracetamol)) with a step 2-based (tramadol) regimen. Current
best evidence shows that it is highly possible that fracture patients nowadays
receive more and stronger painkillers than needed. This study will be mandatory
to provide a protocol for pain-management after extremity fractures.
In addition to drug management, it would be helpful to find predictors for pain
intensity and disability to aid the physician in clinical decision-making and
assessing further management.
Study objective
The primary objective of this study is to determine (differences in) patient
satisfaction with pain relief and pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale) using a
step 1 vs. a step 2 based analgesic regimen.
The secondary objective is to determine predictors of pain intensity and
disability.
This will be mandatory to develop a useful protocol for pain-management.
Study design
This study is designed as a randomized clinical trial with short follow-up (2
weeks). Patients will be randomly assigned to either an acetaminophen based
pain regimen, or a tramadol based regimen. We will measure self-efficacy in
response to nociception and mood at enrollment. At time of suture removal
(approx. 2 weeks) all patients will be given a questionnaire. They are asked to
rate their overall worst and average pain, the level of pain that would be
acceptable to them, overall satisfaction with pain relief (Numeric Rating
Scale), and disability. In addition, we will use a database to record age, sex,
trauma-site, fracture type, AIS score, multi-trauma, mechanism of injury,
treating surgeon, type of surgery and anesthesia, time from injury until
treatment, and comorbidity.
Intake will be *as needed* based, with a daily upper limit intake of: 1)
acetaminophen (4x 1g) 2) tramadol (4x 50-100mg). In addition to their
pre-assigned regimen, patients may receive i.m./s.c. morfine as rescue
medication.
Intervention
Group 1: paracetamol max 1gr per day 'on demand' for a maximum of two weeks.
Group 2: tramadol max 150-300 mg per day 'on demand' for a maximum of two
weeks.
Study burden and risks
This study does not provide immediate advantage for the participating patient.
For future patients however this study is beneficial, as it will evaluate the
effectiveness of the current pain management after surgical treatment after
extremity fractures. Current evidence suggests that these patients nowadays
might be over treated. Furthermore, this study will likely reduce health costs.
Participation in this study is of low risk, since the patients will not receive
more medication then usual and can use rescue medication if they are
undertreated. We don*t expect this to happen very often since each subject will
receive a frequently used regimen. In addition, our previous prospective study
showed adequate pain levels for patients who received step 1 (WHO pain ladder)
medication.
Meibergdreef 9
1100 DD Amsterdam
NL
Meibergdreef 9
1100 DD Amsterdam
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
All adult patients (age > 18) who will undergo surgical treatment for an extremity fracture treated in the Academic Medical Center Amsterdam.
Exclusion criteria
Pregnant, breastfeeding or possibly pregnant patients, patients with relevant drug allergies and children will be excluded from study participation
Further exclusion criteria include: 1) another fracture at any site; 2) pathological fractures; 3) inability to fill out questionnaires; 4) polytrauma patients with other significant injuries outside the skeletal system; 5) patients already receiving any form of analgesic prior to injury; 6) liver or renal dysfunction; 7) diagnosed gastric disease; 8) diagnosed constipation 9) patients receiving MAO-inhibitors.
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EudraCT | EUCTR2012-000680-24-NL |
CCMO | NL39824.018.12 |