Reduce acute rejection rates in the Old-for-Old kidney transplantation program. Less acute rejection in these vulnerable older kidneys inevitable translates in better initial kidney function. Less need for acute rejection treatments with high dose…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
Synonym
Health condition
niertransplantatie
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary comparison will involve an *intention-to-treat* analysis of
• Incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) 6 months
post-transplantation
• Incidence of steroid-resistant and recurrent acute rejection (requiring
antibody therapy)
Secondary outcome
All secondary assessments will be conducted amongst the entire study
population, and will be of the effects of initial allocation (with or without
matching for HLA-DR) on safety outcomes and efficacy measures:
•Primary non function (PNF); delayed graft function (DGF, defined by dialysis
requirement within 7 days post transplant or spontaneous decrease of serum
creatinine >10% per day for 3 consecutive days occurring beyond the seventh day
post transplant)
•Graft function at month 3, 6, 12 and yearly up to 5 years (calculated GFR,
using the Modified Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD] equation).
•Incidence of Late Acute rejection (BPAR occurring between month 6 and 12);
•Presence of donor specific antibodies (DSA) at 6 months (ETRL), these sera
will also be used to calibrate for differences in the creatinine assays.
•Graft survival (including cause of graft loss);
•Patient survival (including cause of death);
•Incidence of cardiovascular events (sudden death, PTCA, CABG, non-fatal acute
myocardial infarction, CVA, peripheral vascular disease);
•Incidence of infections (sub-classified as mild, serious and life threatening);
•Incidence of malignancy (including post-transplantation lymphoproliferative
disorder);
•Incidence of anaemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia as well as comparison of
median values of haemoglobin, white cell count and platelet count);
•Blood pressure (assessed by readings at clinic visits, use of antihypertensive
medication);
•Number of days in hospital during index admission and total in the first year,
excluding admission or scheduled surgery for non-transplant related medical
issues;
•Subset analyses based on waiting-time; cold ischemia time; HLA-DR
compatibility; donor and/or recipient age >= 70 years.
Background summary
The current *Eurotransplant Senior Program* allocates kidneys from older
donors(at least 65 year), without prospective matching for HLA antigens, to
older (at least 65 years) local transplant candidates (13). The ESP program was
introduced in 1999 and has resulted in a significant increase in availability
of kideney older donors for transplantation and consequentely more elderly
dialysis patients have placed on the kidney waiting list. Besides these
advantages, several studies have documented higher acute rejection rates in
recipients of kideney fron older donors, independent of the age category of the
recipients. It is conceivable that prophylactic treatment with anti-lymphocyte
antibodies attenuates the interaction between renal aging changes,
ischemia-reperfusion injury and the ensuing immune response. Thus, at least
theoretically, it should be possible to improve the outcome of older donor
kidneys in young recipients by providing more intensive immune suppression in
the early post-operative period in order to prevent excess rejection rates.
Such an approach may be acceptable for younger recipients, but remains to be
determined for the elderly. The therapeutic index for clinical immune
suppression appears to be even narrower in the elderly than in younger renal
transplant recipients.
In the elderly, cardiovascular and especially infectious causes are among the
leading primary causes of death. There is no doubt that extra boluses of
steroids, recycling of the steroid taper or treatment with poly- or monoclonal
antibodies add significantly to post-transplant morbidity and mortality.
We propose that introduction of prospective matching for HLA-DR antigens in the
context of Old-for-Old allocation may result in less acute rejection episodes,
better preservation of renal function as well as less infectious cause
morbidity and mortality.
Study objective
Reduce acute rejection rates in the Old-for-Old kidney transplantation program.
Less acute rejection in these vulnerable older kidneys inevitable translates in
better initial kidney function. Less need for acute rejection treatments with
high dose intravenous steroids and/or polyclonal anti T-cell antibodies will
allso reduce to incidence of inctious cause mortality, the leading cause of
death in the elderly transplant recipient.
Study design
Observational, prospective, randomized multicenter allocation study to compare
the impact of prospective matching for HLA-DR antigens between donor and
recipient on outcome parameters in the Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP).
Paired kidneys from 300 donors >= 65 year of age will be randomized at the
center or (cooperating) regional level: the first kidney according to current
ESP allocation (waiting time, no prospective matching for HLA antigens) and the
contra-lateral kidney aimed at zero mismatches for HLA-DR followed by waiting
time. Cold ischemia times should be as short as possible, but always under 20
hours.
In the participating centers recipients will be treated with an evidence-based
standardized immunosuppressive regimen. This regimen is already standard
therapy in the large majority of transplant centers and its superior efficacy
has been documented in the largest prospective study in de novo trenal
transplant recipients to date.
Study burden and risks
This is an observational allocation study and there is no additional burden
associated with participation. The proposed HLA matching will, according to all
medical knowledge, not negatively but rather positively influence the outcome
of the selected patients. Treatment regimens and outpatient department visits
are according to (evidence-based) standard medical care for renal transplant
recipients and their follow-up. The amount and number of blood samples,
physical examinations or other tests are the same in both groups and according
to current standard care after renal transplantation.
Albinusdreef 2
Leiden 2333 ZA
NL
Albinusdreef 2
Leiden 2333 ZA
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Patients > 64 years of age
Placed on the Eurotransplant Kidney Waiting List
Exclusion criteria
• Active systemic infection;
• HIV (antigen or antibody), hepatitis B (HBsAg), or hepatitis C (antibody) positivity;
• History of malignancy within five years of enrolment (with the exception of adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer);
• Known to be poorly compliant with clinic visits or prescribed medication;
• Medical history that might limit the individual*s ability to take the defined immunosuppressive agents.
Design
Recruitment
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
metc-ldd@lumc.nl
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL24085.058.08 |