Our primary aim is to conduct a large-scale study that investigates the impact of a specialized alliance training and evaluates the effect of the alliance training on the treatment process and outcome. Our secondary aim is to learn more about theā¦
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Adjustment disorders (incl subtypes)
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The main outcome variable is change in general symptoms and in interpersonal
functioning during and after the intervention phase as assessed by the Outcome
Questionnaire, OQ-45.
Secondary outcome
Secondary parameters are general quality of life as assessed by The Quality of
Life Inventory (QOLI) and general functioning, individual, interpersonal and
social as assessed by The Outcome Rating Scale (ORS).
Background summary
We know from research that psychotherapy is effective. But, meta analyses
suggest that 30-40% of patients fail to benefit from psychotherapy, which means
that there is room for improvement. More and more researchers share the opinion
that knowledge about underlying mechanism of change is the key factor in the
process of therapy improvement. Unfortunately these mechanisms that cause
therapeutic change are still largely unknown. The most important question in
the recent field of psychotherapy research is; how can we isolate and identify
the effective ingredients of therapy practice and how can we enhance their
influence. The therapeutic alliance is considered an essential ingredient of
psychotherapy by many scholars. More than 2000 studies have shown the influence
of the alliance on treatment outcome. But, research on the alliance has been
merely correlational and does not rule out reversed causality. We need new
lines of research to learn more about relational mechanism of change, since the
current body of evidence does not bring us any further when it comes to
learning more about how the alliance contributes to change. Research on the
alliance suggests that to enhance the influence of therapy, therapists need to
focus on the collaborative elements of the relationship. In this study we use a
specialized alliance training for therapists which focuses on these
collaborative elements, as an intervention. This will allow us to isolate and
directly manipulate the ingredients of effective therapy relationships and
collect data on their contribution to the treatment process and outcome.
Study objective
Our primary aim is to conduct a large-scale study that investigates the impact
of a specialized alliance training and evaluates the effect of the alliance
training on the treatment process and outcome.
Our secondary aim is to learn more about the underlying mechanism of change
accountable for the effects of psychotherapy, through isolation and
manipulation of specific elements of effective therapy relationships.
Study design
The study is a Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT). We conduct the study in a
natural clinical setting. We want to investigate if the intervention works
(effectiveness) when used in normal practice. In the trial we will compare
three conditions with a training for therapists as intervention. The first
condition is with alliance training 1 (AT 1), the second with alliance training
2 (AT 2) and the third treatment as usual (TAU), without any alliance training.
In total this study will last about 1 year for each individual patient.
Intervention
The patients who are randomly assigned to condition AT 1 and AT 2 will receive
TAU, but from a therapist who has finished alliance training 1 or 2 and who
will use relational reflection manuals during the treatment. Measurements will
be repeated throughout 15-20 weeks of every single treatment.
Study burden and risks
It is unlikely that general symptoms increase as a result of either the
treatment condition or the treatment as usual. As such, the study poses no risk
to the participants. However, the participants are asked to invest time into
this study. The screening will be conducted by telephone and will take
approximately 50 minutes. Furthermore, a set of questionnaires will be offered
via the internet after every session or after every third session.
Asterweg 17-19 unit 12
1031HL Amsterdam
NL
Asterweg 17-19 unit 12
1031HL Amsterdam
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
-Age range 18-65
-a DSM-IV diagnoses axis I
-Can understand and speak the Dutch language
-Internet access at home
Exclusion criteria
-Drug and alcohol dependency
-Evidence of psychosis or need for hospitalization
-Diagnose of bipolar disorder
-Evidence of active suicidal behavior
-Autism Spectrum Disorders
-Attending another treatment during study
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL36486.068.11 |