The primary objective of the study is to compare the efficacy of single session balloon dilatation with short-term stent placement in PSC patients with a worsening of their cholestatic complaints.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Hepatic and hepatobiliary disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The main outcome of the study is the difference in re-intervention free
survival time between both groups.
Secondary outcome
The comparison between both groups of efficacy with regard to the improvement
of cholestatic symptoms, biochemical cholestasis, and quality of life.
To compare the safety of a single balloon dilatation session with short-term
stenting.
Background summary
Titel: Multicenter randomized trial comparing short-term stenting versus
balloon dilatation for dominant strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a chronic progressive inflammatory disease of
the biliary tree leading to liver cirrhosis. During it's course, dominant bile
duct strictures occur in approximately 50% of patients. These can be
accompanied by worsening of cholestatic symptoms and jaudice and are an
indication for endoscopic treatment. The best form of treatment, either balloon
dilatation or short-term stent placement, has never been formally investigated.
Study objective
The primary objective of the study is to compare the efficacy of single session
balloon dilatation with short-term stent placement in PSC patients with a
worsening of their cholestatic complaints.
Study design
This is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, intervention study with a
medical device.
Intervention
During ERCP half of the subjects will receive a stent to treat the dominant
stricture and the other half will have the stricture strechted out with a
dilating balloon.
Study burden and risks
Currently both interventions belong to standard patient care armamentarium. The
burden for the patient consists of slightly more visits during the two year
follow-up (every 3 months instead of every 4-6 months) in addition to which
blood will be collected more often. During these visits the patient will also
be asked to fill in a quality of life questionnaire and a PSC symptom
questionnaire.
ERCP is associated with a low mortality (<0.5%) and acceptable morbidity (5%).
Most dreaded complications are severe post-ERCP pancreatitis (<2%) and
suppurative cholangitis (<2%). From the available retrospective literature data
the incidence of these complications does not seem to differ between the two
treatment modalities.
Meibergdreef 9
Amsterdam 1100 DD
NL
Meibergdreef 9
Amsterdam 1100 DD
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
PSC
18-75 years
progression cholestatic complaints
elevated total bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase
Exclusion criteria
advanced PSC
suppurative cholangitis
malignancy
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT01398917 |
CCMO | NL34454.018.10 |