To define indications for recently developed, but more expensive, self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) versus cheaper plastic stents in patients with primary or recurrent inoperable malignant extrahepatic common bile duct (CBD) obstruction, based on…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Gastrointestinal stenosis and obstruction
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Medical effects, quality of life, costs/cost-effectiveness in 2 strata (primary
and recurrent patients). Initially plastic stents vs. uncov. + cov. SEMS will
be compared, and secondarily uncov. vs. cov. SEMS. The prognostic model will
present a score to predict survival in patients with primary and recurrent CBD
obstruction and will be used to guide stent choice.
Secondary outcome
not applicable
Background summary
Malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction is a frequent complication of
inoperable periampullary cancer and causes significant morbidity due to
jaundice, cholangitis and malabsorption. The primary goal of treatment is to
relieve CBD obstruction, which can be performed by the placement of a plastic
stent or self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) during Endoscopic Retrograde
Cholangio-Pancreaticography (ERCP). Plastic stents are most often used because
of their efficacy and low costs, however stent obstruction occurs frequently.
SEMS, with a larger luminal diameter, are associated with a longer stent
patency, but are more expensive. Another disadvantige is the tumour ingrowth.
More recently, covered SEMS have been introduced to prevent tumor ingrowth. The
disadvantage of covered stents is stent migration, and cholecystitis and
pancreatitis caused by obstruction of the cystic duct and pancreatic duct.
Until now, only a limited number of studies have compared these devices
Study objective
To define indications for recently developed, but more expensive,
self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) versus cheaper plastic stents in patients
with primary or recurrent inoperable malignant extrahepatic common bile duct
(CBD) obstruction, based on an individualized prognostic risk.
Study design
a) RCT in 26 Dutch centers in 2 strata: 1. 300 patients with primary stent
placement for CBD obstruction, and 2. 160 patients with recurrent CBD
obstruction after previous stent placement. b) Retrospective cohort study for
prognostic model development (n>500). The prognostic model will be validated
with the RCT data and provide the basis for a subgroup specific comparison of
stent types according to individualized risk.
Intervention
After informed consent, 300 (primary) + 160 (recurrent) patients will be
randomized to: a) plastic stent, b) uncovered SEMS, or c) covered SEMS in a
1:1:1 ratio.
Study burden and risks
During the first 30 days after stent placement, patients will keep a diary on
physical symptoms (such as fever, jaundice, pruritis, etc.), and self-rated
health (EQ-VAS). If he patient is unable to complete a diary (which may be the
case if a complication develops on the first few days after stent placement),
data will be collected by proxy assessment. After the first 30 days, the
patients will provide these data on a weekly basis.
Patients will be followed up by home visits of a member of a team of specially
trained research nurses at 14 days, 1 month and then monthly after
randomization until 6 months. After 6 months patients will be visited every 2
months. During these visits, the diaries will be checked and HRQoL
questionnaires and economic evaluation questionnaires will be completed. In
addition, blood samples will be collected at 14 days for bilirubin levels. If
the condition of patients allows, patients will be referred for a
reintervention to treat recurrent CBD obstruction. Due to the unpredictable
timing of reinterventions, it is not feasible to assess the burden of
intervention for patients and informal care givers in all participating
hospitals, and this will therefore be performed at least in the UMCU, and in
other hospitals on a voluntary basis. Patients will be followed until death or
at least for 1 year.
Heidelberglaan 100
3584 CX UTRECHT
NL
Heidelberglaan 100
3584 CX UTRECHT
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
a. Obstructive malignancy at the level of the extrahepatic CBD,
b. Inoperability due to a poor medical condition, local irresectability or distant metastases,
c. Serum bilirubin >30 micromol/L and/or clinical symptoms of obstructive jaundice
d. Informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
a. Malignancy involving intrahepatic bile ducts and duodenum,
b. Known history of pancreatitis or cholecystitis (unless cholecystectomy has been performed),
c. WHO performance score of 4 (100% of time in bed),
d. Unable to fill out quality of life questionnaires
e. Known history of operation of the bile ducts (p.a. choledochojejunostomy) unless cholecystectomy has been performed
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL20815.041.07 |