The primary objective is to examine the predictive value of several types of endogenous inhibitory functions for the risk and severity of acute and persistent pain after surgery. As primary outcome parameter, patients will be asked to keep a pain…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Gastrointestinal therapeutic procedures
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The main study outcome parameter is the presence and severity of pain, assessed
with visual analogue scales, 7 to 10 days after and three months after surgery.
Preoperative endogenous inhibitory functions will form the predictors of acute
and persistent postoperative pain and will consist of three different
measurements: 1. cognitive inhibition as measured with the Stroop taks and with
the Go/No-Go task, to measure interference control and prepotent response
inhibition respectively; 2. Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) in order to
examine the extent to which a painful stimulation (cold pressor test) inhibits
to experience of another painful stimulation (second PPT and EPTT, compared to
the first PPT and EPTT), and; 3. Placebo- and nocebo-suggestions, to examine
the extent to which expectations inhibit (placebo) or facilitate (nocebo, by
diminishing inhibitory functions) pain experience.
Secondary outcome
1. Quality of life as assessed with the SF-36
2. Distress and mood ratings as assessed with visual analogue scales.
Background summary
Chronic pain is a major cause of disability, affecting approximately 20% of the
general population. Up until now, chronic pain remains a difficult to treat
condition. Our knowledge is particularly lacking regarding the mechanisms
underlying the development of chronic pain. In this study, we will focus on the
predictive value of endogenous inhibitory functions for the development of
postoperative pain. These endogenous inhibitory functions refer to functions
that are part of normal cognitive and pain control mechanisms. It has been
shown that these functions predict experimental, acute, pain sensitivity in
healthy volunteers; never have inhibitory functions been examined as predictors
of chronic pain. The aim of the present study is to overcome this limitation,
by examining the level of inhibitory functions in relation to the development
of postoperative pain.
To examine this in detail, we will focus on three different forms of endogenous
inhibition: 1. Cognitive inhibition as measured with cognitive tests, 2.
Conditioned pain modulation as measured with the pain inhibits pain phenomenon,
and 3. Placebo- and nocebo-like effects, in which the effect of suggestions on
pain experience will be evaluated. These functions will be assessed
pre-operatively in a sample of patients scheduled for pancreatic resection
surgery for (pre)cancer. These patients normally do not report pain
pre-operatively; incidence rates of postoperative pain are high, in that as
much as 30-40% of these patients may develop persistent pain (PP) following
surgery. This model is therefore suitable for identifying those at an increased
risk for developing chronic pain.
Our hypothesis is that reduced pre-operative endogenous inhibitory functioning
predicts the development of PP as well as a higher intensity of PP. In
addition, it is expected that the different inhibition functions partially act
in a complementary way, in that they uniquely predict part of the variance in
postoperative pain.
Study objective
The primary objective is to examine the predictive value of several types of
endogenous inhibitory functions for the risk and severity of acute and
persistent pain after surgery. As primary outcome parameter, patients will be
asked to keep a pain diary during three days, the first starting approximately
7 to 10 days after surgery (T1) and the second 3 months later (T2). In this
diary, daily ratings of pain intensity will be recorded on visual analogue
scales. The primary predictors consist of the three endogenous inhibitory
functions: 1. Cognitive inhibition, which will be measured with computer tasks
measuring respectively interference control and prepotent response inhibition;
2. Conditioned pain modulation, measured using a validated paradigm in which
pressure pain threshold (PPT) and electrical pain threshold tolerance (EPTT)
are first determined, followed by a cold pressor test (holding one*s hand in
cold water) followed again by a PPT and EPTT measurement. An increase in the
second PPT and EPTT indicates the presence of pain inhibitory functions, also
referred to as diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC); 3. Placebo- and
nocebo-suggestions, in which cues indicating low and high painful stimulation
are followed by either a correct stimulus (respectively low and high
stimulation) or an incorrect stimulus (respectively high and low stimulation).
A secondary objective is quality of life assessed with the SF -36. Next to the
pain ratings, participants will perform daily indications of distress and mood.
Study design
A prospective pilot study in which the predictive value of several endogenous
inhibitory functions for postoperative pain will be assessed.
Study burden and risks
All tests and methods that are used are non-invasive and not stressful for the
patient. All cognitive tests and questionnaires are widely-used validated and
reliable paper-pencil or computerized tasks. The CPM measurement and the
placebo- and nocebo-like measurements will be based on validated protocols. The
participant can work at his/her work pace, and if desired additional breaks
will be taken. The preoperative testing will take approximately 1.5 hours; the
two postoperative measurements will take approximately 45 minutes each.
Montessorilaan 3
Nijmegen 6500HE
NL
Montessorilaan 3
Nijmegen 6500HE
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Scheduled for pancreatic resection surgery for (pre)cancer
Exclusion criteria
• Inability to speak/understand the Dutch language.
• Severe psychiatric problems
• Neurodegenerative disorders
• Substance abuse
• History of stroke
• Previous major abdominal or thoracic surgery
• Current chronic pain condition
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL44965.091.13 |