To gain insight into factors that indicate an improved postural control by evaluating balance recovery (in terms of centre of mass (CoM) and centre of pressure (CoP)) of both young and older adults during a reaching task while exposed to…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
Synonym
Health condition
leeftijdsgerelateerde veranderingen in de houdingscontrole
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Age-related differences in postural control:
- Response types: in-place response or stepping response; single step,
multiple steps and *fall*
- Balance recovery in terms of bodily displacement: step length, step width,
presence of an APA (anticipatory postural adjustment), COM displacement, COP
displacement and accelerations.
- Balance recovery in terms of reaction times: onset latency (time to initial
response), time to foot-off, time to foot-contact
Secondary outcome
-Clinical Balance test: The Narrow Ridge Balance Test (NRBT) to assess balance
performance in elderly.
-The adapted Dutch version of the Incidental and Planned Exercise Questionnaire
(IPEQ) for older people to measure average weekly physical activity over the
past 3 months of the elderly.
Background summary
Falls are one of the greatest concerns among the elderly, because the incidents
are high and they lead to severe consequences. The extent of the problem will
continue to expand as the number of older people is expected to increase
dramatically over the next few decades. An important risk factor for falls in
the elderly is an impaired postural control, which is defined as the act of
maintaining, achieving or restoring a state of balance during any posture or
activity. A growing number of studies show the potential of video games
incorporating training (exergames) to improve postural control. However, scarce
evidence is available that these interventions actually contribute to a
decrease in fall risk. Finding indicators for improved postural control are
needed in order to be able to validate fall risk interventions. By studying age
related postural adaptations to perturbations that challenge balance in a
controlled environment like CAREN (Computer Assisted Rehabilitation
Environment) insight into these indicators can be gained. Eventually these
findings can be used for validating an exergaming training intervention in
terms of reducing fall risk by improving postural control.
Study objective
To gain insight into factors that indicate an improved postural control by
evaluating balance recovery (in terms of centre of mass (CoM) and centre of
pressure (CoP)) of both young and older adults during a reaching task while
exposed to perturbations of physical, visual or cognitive factors, causing a
near fall.
Study design
The present study has a cross-sectional study design. Balance recovery of
different age groups will be measured during experimental sessions. Both young
and older adults will be exposed to three different types of perturbations
(divided in three experiments) during the performance of a weight-shifting
task.
Intervention
Both young and older participants will perform multiple target-directed weight
shifting movements, i.e. reaching tasks, in three simulated fall risk
situations which are divided in three experiments. The experiments will be
conducted in the CAREN (Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment) lab.
• Experiment 1. Mechanical perturbations
Mechanical perturbations will be created by sudden platform translations with
different velocity profiles during the performance of multiple reaching tasks.
• Experiment 2. Visual surround manipulation
Visual surround will be manipulated by applying optic flow patterns on a large
screen in front of the subjects during the performance of multiple reaching
tasks.
• Experiment 3. Cognitive demanding dual task
Participants will perform a continuous cognitive demanding dual task during the
performance of multiple reaching tasks.
Study burden and risks
Balance is challenged during an everyday standing-reaching task. Participants
are wearing a harness during all trials which is attached with a girdle to the
frame of the CAREN system. During all trials an assistant remains at the side
of the subjects. Time between trials will be enough to let the participants
recover and prepare for upcoming trials.Therefore the risk associated with
participation can be considered negligible and the burden can be considered
minimal.
Antonius Deusinglaan 1
Groningen 9713 AV
NL
Antonius Deusinglaan 1
Groningen 9713 AV
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Age between 20 and 90 and are able to walk 200 m without aids (to a nearby shop), understand verbal instructions and have the visual ability to perceive the information presented on a large screen .
Exclusion criteria
Not able to walk without aids, with orthopaedic or neurological disorders which prevent them from standing and reaching, have visual or hearing deficiencies that prevent them from perceiving or hearing presented information or/and have cognitive impairments that prevent them from understanding our instructions
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL43581.042.13 |
Other | nnb |
OMON | NL-OMON23172 |