Our primary objective is to determine whether testing for molecular markers, i.e. hrHPV, methylationmarkers , i.a. CADM1/MAL and combinations thereof, yields a higher sensitivity and specificity for the detection of CIN2/3 or cancer after treatment…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Cervix disorders (excl infections and inflammations)
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The main study parameter is the histological confirmed recurrence of a
high-grade lesion in the study population from the moment of treatment until
exit-colposcopy
Secondary outcome
Secondary study parameters include:
- In physician obtained samples:
• Presence of, and if applicable type of hrHPV
• Result of methylationmarker testing , i.a. CADM1/MAL
• Result of cervical cytology
- In self obtained samples (self-sampling):
• Presence of, and if applicable type of hrHPV
• Result of methylationmarker testing , i.a. CADM1/MAL
- In biopsies:
• Presence of, and if applicable type of hrHPV
- Result of methylationmarker testing , i.a. CADM1/MAL
- Results of behavioural questionnaire (including sexual behaviour, smoking and
previous HPV- vaccination)
- Results of questionnaire about use of self-sampling device
- Histological results of all endocervical samples, biopsies, LLETZ-treatment
and cold-knife conisation taken.
- Result of additional immuno-staining
The collection of aforementioned parameters aims to assess whether testing for
methylation markers in conjunction with hrHPV testing is more effective in
terms of sensitivity and specificity than cytology or a combination of hrHPV
testing and cytology in detecting residual/recurrent CIN disease. In addition,
we will investigate whether self-sampling provides a robust and more patient
friendly approach for the detection of hrHPV and methylationtsting during
post-treatment monitoring.
Background summary
Despite population based cervical screening still approximately 600 women are
diagnosed with cervical cancer in The Netherlands each year. Another 6000 women
are treated annually for the cervical cancer precursor lesions, named
high-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN2/3). Generally 10-15% of
these women develop residual/recurrent cervical disease after treatment.
According to the Dutch guidelines, women are monitored for residual/recurrent
cervical disease by cervical cytology at 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment.
However, cytology is suboptimal given its low sensitivity and specificity for
residual/recurrent CIN2/3. Furthermore the many follow-up visits result in loss
of adherence of women to the monitoring schedule. Besides, the low positive
predictive value of cytology for post-treatment CIN2/3 leads to unnecessary
diagnostic procedures (repeat smears and colposcopic examinations).
Infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) is necessary for the
development of cervical cancer, and adding testing for high-risk human
papillomavirus (hrHPV) DNA six months after treatment dramatically increased
the sensitivity for post-treatment CIN2/3, while the negative predictive value
of a hrHPV-negative, cytological normal smear was 99%. However, the positive
predictive value of a hrHPV test was still limited, indicating that the
specificity of molecular testing needs further improvement. Methylation
markers, i.e. markers reflecting promoter methylation of host cell genes such
as CADM1 and MAL may enhance the specificity for CIN2/3. We recently found that
silencing of both tumour suppressor genes CADM1 and MAL, primarily resulting
from promoter methylation, is functionally involved in cervical cancer
development. Analysis of cervical biopsies showed significantly more CADM1 and
MAL promoter methylation in >=CIN3 compared with <=CIN1 lesions (p<0.001).
Moreover, CADM1 and MAL promoter methylation was significantly more frequent in
hrHPV-positive scrapings of women who developed >=CIN2 compared to those that
did not and displayed sensitivity for these lesions greater than cytology.
Hence, it can be hypothesized that addition of i.a. CADM1 and MAL promoter
methylation analysis during post-treatment monitoring will markedly increase
the specificity for >=CIN2. Moreover, recent studies have demonstrated that
molecular testing on self-sampled cervical cells offers a reliable alternative
to analysis of conventional cervical scrapings in screening programs.
Study objective
Our primary objective is to determine whether testing for molecular markers,
i.e. hrHPV, methylationmarkers , i.a. CADM1/MAL and combinations thereof,
yields a higher sensitivity and specificity for the detection of CIN2/3 or
cancer after treatment in comparison with cytology.
Study design
The study is designed as a multicenter prospective clinical cohort study.
At treatment a cervical scrape will be taken for cytology and testing of hrHPV
and methylationmarkers , i.a. CADM1/MAL . Six, twelve and twenty-four months
post-treatment cervical cells will be collected by both a self-sampler and by
the gynaecologist and tested for hrHPV and methylation markers. The latter
scrapes will also be analysed by cytology. In case of an abnormal smear (>=BMD)
and/or a hrHPV and methylation marker positive test in the physician obtained
sample, at six months post-treatment, colposcopy will be performed and biopsies
will be taken. At thirteen months, a colposcopy with mandatory biopsy taking
will be performed on test negative women as well. Women with residual/recurrent
>=CIN2/3 disease will be treated. Twenty-four months post-treatment cervical
cells will be collected by both a self-sampler and the cervical smear and
tested for cytology and hrHPV and methylation markers. In case of an abnormal
smear (>=BMD) and/or a hrHPV positive test a colposcopy will be performed. In
case of normal cytology and a hrHPV positive test, cytology and the hrHPV have
to be repeated at 36 months after treatment.In case of a neg smear and a neg
HPV test the women will be sent to population based screening
Study burden and risks
Risks and burden are linked to protocol procedures, such as cervical sampling
and colposcopy. Although these are routine procedures, carried out by medical
qualified personnel, they may cause side effects or discomfort to the subject.
However, it is expected that these procedures will generally be well
tolerated. The only extra burden involves the self-sampling of
cervical-vaginal cells using a user-friendly self-sampling device.
Self-sampling poses no threats to the physical well-being of a woman.
de Boelelaan 1117
Amsterdam 1081 HV
NL
de Boelelaan 1117
Amsterdam 1081 HV
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
-A histological confirmed CIN2/3 lesion that will be treated by cone biopsy or colposcopic guided LLETZ.
- Written informed consent prior to enrolment.
- Sufficient knowledge of the Dutch language.
- A minimum age of 18 years.
-The intention to comply with the requirements of the protocol.
Exclusion criteria
-The subject is pregnant (or has been in the last three months)
-The subject has received prophylactic (or therapeutic) HPV- vaccination.
-The subject has a diagnosis of carcinoma in cone biopsy or colposcopic guided LLETZ
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL29589.029.09 |