The current study will focus on the effects of an intensive programme of exposure of prism adaptation (i.e. daily exposure during two weeks) and compare these to sham adaptation.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Structural brain disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The effects of prism adaptation will be measured using several
neuropsychological tests: star cancellation, line bisection, landmark task,
drawing/copying, describing photographs, etc. Of all these tasks measures, such
as reaction times, accuracy, number of perseverations, starting point/endpoint,
procedure (e.g. systematic, random, etc) will be analysed.
The second outcome measure will be differences in severity of neglect and daily
impairments (as measured with the Catherine Bergego scale)
Secondary outcome
- balance board: laterale shift of centre of pressure in cm
- force plate (posture): lateral shift of centre of pressure in cm
- questionnaires: severity and frequency of neglect symptoms
Background summary
Lesions to the right temporo-parietal cortex typically result in neglect, a
disorder in which patients fail to respond to information in the contralesional
(mostly left) space. In severe cases, neglect patient act as if the left half
of their world does not exist. For example, a patient with neglect might ignore
food on the left half of their plate or fail to shave or make up the neglected
side of their face. It is now widely accepted that neglect is a complex,
heterogenous disorder that includes spatially lateralised deficits (e.g.
attentional biases) as well as non-lateralised deficits (e.g. sustained
temporal attention, temporal perception). Patients with neglect have been found
to have a poorer functional outcome compared to patients without neglect,
hence, rehabilitation of neglect has been the subject of many scientific
studies. In lab situations, with usually small groups of neglect patients,
prism adaptation appears to ameliorate the signs of neglect on a variety of
(neuropsychological) tests as well as some more *natural tasks*, such as
wheelchair navigation, or posture. These beneficial effects of prism adaptation
have been reported to last 2 hours up to one week after a single adaptation
session, and even up to 6 weeks following repetitive adaptation.
Study objective
The current study will focus on the effects of an intensive programme of
exposure of prism adaptation (i.e. daily exposure during two weeks) and compare
these to sham adaptation.
Study design
Patients will be tested 6 times:
* baseline: at start of the study (T0)
* one week after starting adaptation (T1)
* two weeks after starting adaptation (T2)
* one week after ending adaptation (T3)
* two weeks after ending adaptation (T4)
* four weeks after ending adaptation (T5)
* twelve weeks after ending adaptation (T6)
During all session, neuropsychological neglect screening tests will be
presented along with a balance board test. During sessions 2, 4, and 6, tests
for posture and mobility will be performed and questionnaires will be filled
in. Nurses, physiotherapist, and the occupation therapist will fill out
questionnaires and observation scales also.
Intervention
During prism adaption, patients wear prisms that shift their vision in one
direction (e.g. 10° to the right). They will initially misreach in the
direction of the prismatic shift (i.e. to the right), when they intend to point
directly to a target. After a few pointing movements, they quickly learn to
point accurately in the direction of the target to compensate for the shift in
vision. When the prisms are removed after multiple pointing trials
(approximately 100), patients will misreach in the direction opposite to the
prismatic shift.
Study burden and risks
Each patient will be seen 10 times during 2 weeks.
Patients will be tested 6 times:
* baseline: at start of the study (T0)
* one week after starting adaptation (T1)
* two weeks after starting adaptation (T2)
* one week after ending adaptation (T3)
* two weeks after ending adaptation (T4)
* four weeks after ending adaptation (T5)
* twelve weeks after ending adaptation (T6)
The risks of prism adaptation are negligible. Investigations of the possible
effect of treatment on neglect can only be assessed in a group of hemispatial
neglect patients.
Rembrandtkade 10
Utrecht 3583 TM
NL
Rembrandtkade 10
Utrecht 3583 TM
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
stroke, signs of neglect, 18-85 years of age, sufficient ability to comprehend and to communicate, as observed during speech therapy, neuropsychological assessment and/or neglect screening , sufficient motivation to participate in an intense rehabilitation treatment programme for two weeks
Exclusion criteria
expected admission to the rehabilitation centre of less than 4 weeks
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL38055.041.12 |