The primary objective of this study is to determine (differences in) patient satisfaction with pain relief and pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale) using a step 1 vs. a step 2 based analgesic regimen.The secondary objective is to determine…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
- Fractures
Synonym
Health condition
pijn
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The main study parameters are the outcomes of the pain/satisfaction Numeric
Rating Scale.
Secondary outcome
The secondary study parameters are the outcomes of the self-efficacy scale and
the disability questionnaire.
Background summary
Fracture patients are prescribed a spectrum of analgesics to reduce pain. The
conscious understanding of this pain may be altered by a variety of factors,
including psychosocial factors. This could explain the apparent differences in
prescription habits for analgesic drugs, between American and Dutch orthopaedic
surgeons. There is currently no official (conservative) protocol for
pain-management after extremity fractures. The large differences between the
two countries emphasize how much there is to learn in this area of
investigation.
In this project we will study the effects of two different frequently used
analgesic regimens on pain relief, satisfaction with pain relief, and
disability after skeletal trauma. This study will compare a step
1-(acetaminophen (paracetamol)) with a step 2-based (acetaminophen + tramadol)
regimen. Current best evidence shows that it is highly possible that fracture
patients nowadays receive more and stronger painkillers than needed. This study
will be mandatory to provide a protocol for pain-management after extremity
fractures.
In addition to drug management, it would be helpful to find predictors for pain
intensity and disability to aid the physician in clinical decision-making and
assessing further management.
Study objective
The primary objective of this study is to determine (differences in) patient
satisfaction with pain relief and pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale) using a
step 1 vs. a step 2 based analgesic regimen.
The secondary objective is to determine predictors of pain intensity and
disability.
This will be mandatory to develop a useful protocol for pain-management.
Study design
This study is designed as a randomized clinical trial with short follow-up (2
weeks). Patients will be randomly assigned to either an acetaminophen based
pain regimen, or a tramadol based regimen. We will measure self-efficacy in
response to nociception and mood at enrollment. At time of follow-up (approx. 2
weeks) all patients will be given a questionnaire. They are asked to rate their
overall worst and average pain, the level of pain that would be acceptable to
them, overall satisfaction with pain relief (Numeric Rating Scale), and
disability. In addition, we will use a database to record age, sex,
trauma-site, fracture type, mechanism of injury, and comorbidity.
Intake will be *as needed* based, with a daily upper limit intake of: 1)
acetaminophen (4x 1g) 2) tramadol (4x 50-100mg).
Study burden and risks
This study does not provide immediate advantage for the participating patient.
For future patients however this study is beneficial, as it will evaluate the
effectiveness of the current pain management after conservative treatment after
extremity fractures. This study will likely reduce health costs. Participation
in this study is of low risk, since the patients will not receive more
medication then usual. It is not expected that patients will be undertreated,
since each subject will receive a frequently used regimen. In addition, our
previous prospective study showed adequate pain levels for patients who
received step 1 (WHO pain ladder) medication.
Meibergdreef 9 Meibergdreef 9
Amsterdam 1100 DD
NL
Meibergdreef 9 Meibergdreef 9
Amsterdam 1100 DD
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
All adult patients (age > 18) who will receive conservative treatment for an extremity fracture.
Exclusion criteria
Pregnant, breastfeeding or possibly pregnant patients and patients with relevant drug allergies will be excluded from study participation
Further exclusion criteria include: 1) phalangeal fractures; 2) stress fractures; 3) another fracture at any site; 4) pathological fractures; 5) inability to fill out questionnaires; 6) polytrauma patients with other significant injuries outside the skeletal system; 7) patients already receiving any chronic form of analgesic prior to injury; 8) liver or renal dysfunction; 9) diagnosed constipation; 10) patients receiving MAO-inhibitors.
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EudraCT | EUCTR2012-001030-34-NL |
CCMO | NL40004.018.12 |