Overall aimThe ultimate goal of our studies is to optimize treatment and reduce treatment related complications in patients with diabetes and cognitive impairmentOur specific objectives are to:1. assess the validity of two self-administered…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Diabetic complications
- Dementia and amnestic conditions
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The main study outcome is a diagnosis of cognitive impairment, defined as
either MCI or dementia, regardless of the underlying etiology. The diagnosis
will be established at the memory clinic at a multidisciplinary team meeting
with a rigorous standardized work-up and according to internationally accepted
diagnostic criteria. With this outcome we can calculate the accuracy of the
screening instruments and the GP evaluation.
Secondary outcome
Secundary outcome of the study will be a a detailed characterisation (cognitive
profile, brain MRI, diagnosis) of a population based sample of patients with
T2DM and cognitive impairment. Furthermore, we will examine the effect of the
diagnostic procedure on diabetes care and patients* quality of life six and
twenty-four months after a diagnosis of cognitive dysfunction.
Background summary
Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is associated with an increased risk of cognitive
impairment, including dementia. Cognitive impairment is often undiagnosed. This
is an important problem since cognitive impairment in T2DM is known to be
associated with impaired self management and an increased incidence of
diabetes-related complications. These problems may be reduced by improving care
and social support in people with established cognitive impairment. Unlike
other diabetic complications, cognitive impairment is not yet routinely
evaluated in daily practice. The establishment of a reliable and efficient test
is an essential first step in the early detection and management of cognitive
impairment in T2DM
Study objective
Overall aim
The ultimate goal of our studies is to optimize treatment and reduce treatment
related complications in patients with diabetes and cognitive impairment
Our specific objectives are to:
1. assess the validity of two self-administered cognitive test instruments to
detect cognitive impairment in older patients with T2DM in a primary care
setting and select the optimal instrument
2. assess the diagnostic accuracy of a standardised GP evaluation in detecting
unrecognised cognitive impairment in patients with T2DM
3. estimate the accuracy and efficiency of the combination of the optimal
instrument with the GP evaluation
Secondary objective:
4. provide a detailed characterisation (cognitive profile, brain MRI,
diagnosis) of a population based sample of patients with T2DM and cognitive
impairment
5. to examine the effect of the diagnostic procedure on diabetes care and
patients* quality of life six and twenty-four months after a diagnosis of
cognitive impairment
Study design
The Cognitive Impairment in Diabetes study (COG-ID) will include 228 people
aged >=70 with T2DM. These people will be recruited from participating general
practices and are diagnosed with T2DM but not known with cognitive impairment.
All participants will undergo an evaluation including two self-administered
instruments (*Test Your Memory* and *Self-Administered Gerocognitive
Examination*) and a standardised assessment for cognitive impairment by a
general practitioner (GP), including a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). In
addition, a quality of life and depressive symptom questionnaire (SF-36 and
CES-D) will be filled out. All participants suspected of cognitive impairment
(on either cognitive test instrument or the GP assessment) and a random sample
of 30% of participants without suspicion of cognitive impairment will be
referred to the memory clinic in the UMCU, where a medical examination,
neuropsychological examination and MRI will be performed. At the memory clinic
the main outcome (i.e. presence or absence of cognitive impairment) will be
determined, defined as a clinical diagnosis of either mild cognitive impairment
(MCI) or dementia. These diagnoses will serve as reference standard. Based on
the reference standard the outcome of the cognitive test instruments will be
classified as true or false positive and true or false negative and the
diagnostic accuracy of the cognitive test instruments, separate and combined,
will be examined.
The results will be communicated to the GP and patients according to a
predefined protocol. In case of a diagnosis of cognitive impairment the GP is
suggested to adjust the diabetes regimen. After six and twenty-four months a
follow-up questionnaire will be sent to the patient to assess the impact of the
study on the quality of life and depressive symptomatology of patients.
Study burden and risks
There are no health risks associated with the procedures and techniques used.
A diagnosis of MCI or, even more so, dementia can have substantial impact on
patients and their relatives. Nevertheless, it is important to emphasize that
these diagnoses can only be established if the patient and/or the relatives
themselves express serious cognitive complaints. Hence, although the patient
or relatives might be in denial, the diagnosis will generally not come as a
surprise. Often the diagnosis will help to understand the cause of complaints
and insecurities that have already bothered people for a long time.
The diagnosis of dementia or MCI will be established according to
internationally accepted criteria, at a specialist clinic. In this setting the
risk of false positive dementia diagnosis is minimal. In case of doubt, no
diagnosis will be established, and the patient will be offered a reevaluation
after 6 to 12 months.
The results of the study will contribute to an earlier detection of cognitive
impairment in patients with T2DM and thus help to improve treatment for these
patients in the future. Direct implementation of this diagnostic procedure in
all general practices in the Netherlands or abroad seems feasible.
Heidelberglaan 100
Utrecht 3584CX
NL
Heidelberglaan 100
Utrecht 3584CX
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and aged 70 years or older
Exclusion criteria
- Patients with a previous diagnosis of cognitive problems or dementia
- Patients unable or unwilling to give written informed consent
- Not capable of writing and reading in Dutch
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL37478.041.11 |