To determine the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis after a tick bite in the Dutch setting, in relation to tick infection, tick engorgement and attachment time.
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Bacterial infectious disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary study parameter is the prophylaxis efficacy, i.e. the relative risk
(RR) reduction for developing Lyme disease after a tick bite and the NNT to
prevent one case of Lyme disease. The tick screening results will be used to
assess the reduction in NNT when only prescribing prophylaxis if the tick is
infected and the engorgement or attachment time are above a certain threshold.
Secondary outcome
The number of participants that develop AEs in the month after taking the
prophylaxis. Scores for epidemiological risk factors for acquiring tick bites
and developing Lyme disease such as exposure to ticks in daily life,
participants* activities when acquiring the tick bite, area of acquiring the
tick bite, prevention of tick bites. Differences in NNT for children and
adults.
Background summary
In the last 15 years, the number of cases of early Lyme disease in the
Netherlands has tripled to 22,000 per year, posing an increasing public health
burden. Antibiotic treatment of early Lyme disease is crucial as it can prevent
the development of late and more severe disease stages. However, infections can
initially remain undetected due to the diverse and often ambiguous nature of
clinical manifestations of Lyme disease. Furthermore laboratory diagnostics are
not always capable of detecting an early infection.
In the US, prophylactic antibiotic treatment after a tick bite has been shown
to prevent most Lyme disease. It has not been investigated whether prophylaxis
is effective in the Netherlands whereas transmission dynamics regarding ticks
and Borrelia species are different from the US. With 1.1 million tick bites per
year the recommendation of prophylaxis would result in very large numbers of
patients treated with prophylaxis.
For a future evidence-based guideline on prophylaxis, its efficacy in the Dutch
setting should be investigated. It should also be investigated to what extent
the NNT can be reduced by using tick-screening criteria (tick infection, tick
engorgement and attachment time) to assess the risk of Lyme disease after each
tick bite. If this tick-screening and subsequent preventive intervention
procedure proves successful, most Lyme disease is preventable with minimal use
of antibiotics.
Study objective
To determine the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis after a tick bite in the
Dutch setting, in relation to tick infection, tick engorgement and attachment
time.
Study design
This is a randomized controlled intervention study. A maximum of 4500
participants reporting a tick bite will be included and randomly treated with
antibiotic prophylaxis or receive no further treatment. Participants in both
groups will be followed up for the development of Lyme disease.
Intervention
The participants in the treatment group will take a single dose of doxycycline
in a dosage of 200 mg for adults and children of 8 years and older and above 50
kg body weight; in a dosage of 4 mg/kg doxycycline for children of 8 years and
older and below 50 kg body weight.
Study burden and risks
The participants in the treatment group may benefit of a possible effective
prophylactic treatment. As with the use of any medicinal product, the
participants may experience adverse events. Participants in the non-treatment
group have no direct benefit but also no additional risk.
All participants (including those not receiving prophylaxis) send their ticks
to the RIVM, and fill in online questionnaires at t=0, 1 wk and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12,
15 and 18 months after inclusion. Participants are advised to regularly check
the place of the tick bite and consult their GP if an erythema migrans or other
health complaints develop. This may have an indirect beneficial effect because
participants are triggered to pay attention for manifestations of Lyme disease.
Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9
Bilthoven 3721 MA
NL
Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9
Bilthoven 3721 MA
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Persons who:
- are 8 yrs and older
- are not pregnant
- report a recent tick bite on the webportal Tekenradar.nl * i.e. at the moment of inclusion they are able to take prophylaxis within 72 hrs after removal of the tick.
- are willing to send the tick to the RIVM.
Exclusion criteria
Persons who:
- are unable to give informed consent or do not have a thorough command of the Dutch language.
- report other tick bites in the three months before inclusion.
- have a contra indication for treatment with doxycycline (including pregnancy and earlier allergic reactions to tetracyclines).
- are * at the moment inclusion * not able to take prophylaxis within 72 hours after removal of the tick
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EudraCT | EUCTR2012-005101-51-NL |
CCMO | NL42713.094.12 |
OMON | NL-OMON27133 |