Primary objectiveThe primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized PT program according to the treatment guideline on improvement of the ability to perform daily life tasks compared to regular PT as add-on treatment to BTX-…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Neuromuscular disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Primary outcomes:
Disability
Disability will be measured with the disability section of the TWSTRS scale.
The TWSTRS scale is a valid and reliable tool to measure severity, disability
and pain in CD. The disability section is a six point likert scale which
consists of six items like driving a car, reading and performing ADL activities
(maximal score 30 points).
Secondary outcome
Secondary outcomes
Disability
The ability to perform daily life tasks will also be measured with the
Functional Disability questionnaire. (3)The FDQ is a 27-item scale to measures
the impact of CD on activities of daily living (ADL). Questions are asked about
the extent to which CD affects the engagement in and performance of a sample of
activities at the present time. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale (maximal
score 68 points).
Severity
The severity of CD will be measured with the TSUI-scale, consisting of
different aspects of abnormal posture and movements in CD patients. It has a
maximal score of 18 points. The TSUI-scale is a widely used and standardized
scale to measure the severity of CD.
In addition, Active Range Of Motion (AROM) will be measured to determine the
ability to voluntary move the head. AROM is measured with a Cervical Range Of
Motion Instrument (CROM), a frame with three separate inclinometers to measure
AROM in the sagittal, coronal and horizontal planes.
Severity of CD will also be measured with the Clinical Global
Impressions-Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) and the Clinical Global
Impression - Improvement scale (CGI-I) Both scales are observer- or patient-
rated scale that measures illness severity and global improvement. The CGI is
rated on a 7-point scale.
Patients will be recorded on video according a video protocol and the
TSUI-scale, CGI-S and CGI-I will be scored by a blinded movement disorder
specialist.
Pain
Each patient is asked to rate their pain on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). A
score of 0 means no pain and a score of 10 means the worst pain imaginable. The
NRS is a reliable and validated toot for the assessment of pain.
Quality of Life
Quality of Life (QoL) will be measured with the cranio-cervical dystonia
questionnaire (CDQ-24) The CDQ-24 is a validated and disease specific, self
reporting questionnaire to evaluate quality of life of patients with cervical
dystonia on a five point likert scale
Anxiety and depression
Anxiety will be measured with the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). The BAI is a
valid and reliable tool measure the severity of anxiety in a person. It has 21
items describing anxiety symptoms which can be scored on a 4 point likert
scale. Depression will be measured with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).
The BDI is a valid and reliable tool to measure the severity of depression and
subtypes of depression. It has 21 items describing depression symptoms which
can be scored on a 4 point likert scale.
Economic evaluation
The economic evaluation will be performed as a cost-utility analysis from a
societal perspective with a time horizon of one year. The primary outcome
parameter will be the costs per quality adjusted life year (QALY).
Cost-utility analysis facilitates the comparative assessment of health care
innovations across different types of interventions, disease areas and health
care settings.
In addition, a cost-effectiveness analysis closely related to the clinical
outcome will be performed with the costs per unit on the TWSTRS-disability
scale as the outcome measure.
Incremental cost-utility and cost-effectiveness ratios for the add-on
standardized PT program versus add-on regular PT will be calculated as the
extra costs per QALY gained and the extra costs per unit decrease in
TWSTRS-disability score. This will be reported in cost-effectiveness planes and
cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.
Bias*corrected and accelerated non-parametric bootstrapping will be performed
to account for sampling uncertainty, drawing at least 1000 samples of the same
size as the original sample for each treatment arm separately and with
replacement.
Costs will be calculated according to the most recent national guidelines for
unit costing in health care research. With the time horizon of one year,
discounting to account for time preference of costs and effects will not be
performed.
The economic evaluation will include the direct medical as well as the direct
and indirect non-medical costs of care. The care consumption of each patient is
registered by the therapist. The number of PT sessions as collected by the
trial therapists as well as the number of BTX-injections during the year will
be counted and multiplied by their respective unit costs to derive the direct
medical costs of the intervention. Additional costs include e.g. the costs of
general practitioner care and home care. Direct non-medical costs reflect the
non-reimbursable expenses by patients related to the disease, for example
travel to and from the PT practice. These costs will be monitored by self
administered questionnaires. Indirect non-medical costs are associated with
loss of productivity due to inability to work and will be registered in the
subgroup of patients below the age of 65 with the Productivity Costs
Questionnaire (PCQ). The PCQ is a 22 item questionnaire used to measure absence
of work due to health problems and is advised as standard instrument for use in
economic evaluations of Dutch healthcare (Appendix XII). The friction cost
method will be applied to calculate the costs of production loss based on the
most recent friction period; as stated, unit costs of resources used will be
based on the most recent national guidelines. The base year for unit costing
will be 2012.
Background summary
Rationale and background
Cervical Dystonia (CD), or torticollis is a disabling neurological disorder
characterized by abnormal positions of the head due to involuntary muscle
contractions of the neck. The posture in cervical dystonia patient can feature
one or a combination of
postures: rotation (torticollis); lateral tilting (laterocollis); flexion
(anterocollis);extension (retrocollis); and lateral shift. Pain is experienced
by 75% of the patients and daily life activities are limited. With an estimated
prevalence of 5.7 patients per
100.000 persons in Western Europe, CD is the most common form of dystonia. The
pathophysiology of CD and dystonia in general, is largely unclear.
Neuro-imaging and electrophysiological studies point towards functional
abnormalities in the circuit
sensorimotor cortex, basal ganglia, brainstem and cerebellum. Reduced
inhibition in these circuits leads to over activity of the sensorimotor cortex
resulting in overflow of performed movements Over the last decade, increasing
evidence points towards maladaptive neuroplasticity of the central nervous
system in dystonia.
Neuroplasticity is the capacity of neurons and neural networks in the brain to
change connections and behaviour in response to new information, sensory
stimulation, development, or damage. Altered mechanisms for neuroplasticity due
to a genetic
pre-disposition combined with external triggering factors like trauma or
repetitive training form currently the main hypothesis in the pathophysiology
of dystonia.
The treatment options for CD are mainly symptomatic, aimed at reducing
involuntary movements, correcting abnormal head positions and reducing pain.
Currently, the best evidence based treatment option is to inject the dystonic
neck muscles with
Botulinum Toxin (BTX). BTX improved head postures and pain in 84% of the CD
patients with a mean improvement of 7.7 points on the TSUI-scale (severity) and
7.1 point on the TWSTRS disability scale.
In addition to BTX treatment, most CD patients are referred for PT. However,
theevidence for the effects of PT on CD are very limited.(10) Only two small
RCT*s with a short period of high intensity PT, investigated the effects of a
PT program on CD. The RCT by Tassoreli et al.(compared a combination of BTX
injections and a PT program to BTX injections alone in 40 patients after two
weeks of treatment. The outcome showed significant positive effects on pain and
disability, without differences on the severity of CD. The second RCT, compared
similar treatment
options and showed significant improvements on pain, active range of motion
(AROM) and disability scores in the group that received BTX combined with PT
after 6 weeks of treatment. In conclusion, both studies showed added value of
PT in combination with BTX injections mainly in the domain of disability. In
both studies, intensity of PT was high and duration was short, varying from 40
minutes per session every other day for six weeks up to 90 minutes a day for 2
weeks. It is difficult to extrapolate the positive results of both RCT*s to the
current regular care of chronic diseases given by physical therapists. For most
patients and therapists it will not be feasible to combine such an intensive
program with their daily lives and practice. Furthermore, a longer treatment
period seems more
appropriate for the long term effects in CD patients. A more practical and
international accepted approach towards the treatment of CD is
described by the physiotherapist J.P. Bleton. Unfortunately, the effect of the
Bleton treatment has never been investigated in a large randomized trial. The
hypothesis of his treatment is towards alteration of neuroplastic changes in
dystonia by massed practice methods i.e. to repetitively perform exercises to
learn new motor skills. The main goals of this method are to rehabilitate the
antagonist muscles and to control the dystonic movements by training frequently
in a functional way. Exercises are teached during one or two PT sessions a
week. After teaching the patients, intensive training is required in the
patient*s own environment (up to 10 times a day for 10 minutes). In addition,
patients are encouraged to correct the dystonic posture during their daily live
activities by turning their head in the opposite direction of the dystonic
posture. The Bleton method is unfortunately, not a standardized method.
We are currently developing an official Dutch physical therapy treatment
guideline physiotherapists and exercise therapists. It will be developed
according the AGREE standards in corporation with the Royal Dutch Society for
Physiotherapy (KNGF), the Society for Cesar therapy and Mensendieck (VvOCM) and
the HvA. The guideline is developed within the DystonieNet, a national
collaboration between neurologists
and paramedics in research, education and treatment of CD. The guideline will
be a standardized, best-evidence and best-practice guideline, adapted to
standard Dutch practice management. Shortly, the guideline recommends a one
year PT-program that
emphasizes independent practice in the patient*s own environment. During the
first six months patients receive weekly PT session to learn the new motor
skills with additional home based exercises. During the second half year
patients receive one session a month and will be learned how to maintain or
improve their newly gained motor skills independently. The definite treatment
guideline is expected in
September 2011.
The effect of this standardized PT program according the treatment guideline in
combination with BTX treatment will be tested and compared to BTX treatment
combined with regular physical therapy. Regular PT usually consists of one
session a week with interventions like massage, muscle stretching and training
of the dystonic muscles. Regular PT is mainly focused on training of the
dystonic muscles in contrast to the method described by Bleton aiming to
rehabilitate the antagonist muscles. The therapists of the regular therapy are
not trained to treat patients according the treatment guideline. The reason to
compare the guideline treatment with regular treatment instead of no treatment
in the control group is that we want to rule out the (placebo) effect of
attention due to therapy in general. By giving PT treatment to both groups all
the patients receive regular attention by a therapist.
In addition, an economic evaluation will be performed by comparing the costs
and health utility of the new standardized PT program with the regular PT
treatment. We expect the standardized PT program to be more cost effective
compared to regular PT as fewer sessions are required (34 sessions vs. 52
sessions), combined with the expectation that it*s more effective to improve
daily life activities and consequently,
employment status and productivity.
Study objective
Primary objective
The primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized PT
program according to the treatment guideline on improvement of the ability to
perform daily life tasks compared to regular PT as add-on treatment to
BTX-injections in CD patients.
Secondary objectives
The secondary objectives are to investigate the effectiveness of a standardized
PT program according to the treatment guideline in comparison to regular PT as
add-on treatment to BTX-injections on:
- Severity of dystonia
- Pain
- Quality of life
- Anxiety and depression
- Healthcare costs and health utility
Study design
Data will be collected at baseline, after six months of physical therapy and
after one year of physical therapy on the same day as patients receive BTX
injections by the principal investigator.
Intervention
Experimental group
The experimental group receives a one year PT program according the guideline
in combination with BTX injections. The PT program will start two weeks after
the injections, when the beneficial effects of the BTX are optimal. The PT
program will be given by a specially trained physical therapist. The intensity
of the PT program will be higher during the first six months in order to
stimulate plastic changes in the central nervous system. During the first
month, patients will receive two PT sessions of 30 minutes each week. During
the following five months patients receive a PT session of 30 minutes once a
week. During the second six months, patients will receive one PT session each
month focused on coaching the patient and independent continuation of the
exercises. Daily home based exercises have to be performed up to 5 times a day
for 10-15 minutes for maintaining and increasing the made progression during
the PT sessions. The emphasis of the PT program is on the functional
performance of the exercises adapted to daily life situations. Reverse Movement
Rehabilitation for example, is aimed at placing the head in the opposite
direction of the dystonic pull to reactivate the corrector muscles and gain
more voluntary control over the dystonic movements. Daily activities like
watching TV, computer work and household tasks need to be adapted so the head
is positioned in the opposite direction of the dystonic pull. Exercises will
become more difficult during the course of the PT program so the patient will
have complete voluntary control through the complete range of motion of the
head at the end of the study. Passive mobilizations and stretching of the
dystonic muscles are used to create the optimal conditions for free and
controlled movement of the head.
Control Group
The control group will receive BTX injections and regular PT for one year. The
weekly sessions will be retrieved from the local PT*s.
Study burden and risks
Physical therapy according the guideline does not have any extra risks compared
to standard physical therapy.
Meibergdreef 9
Amsterdam 1105 AZ
NL
Meibergdreef 9
Amsterdam 1105 AZ
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
- 30 years or older
- Treated with Botuline Toxin injections for more than one year
Exclusion criteria
- Secondary (including psychogenic) dystonia
- Hereditary (dominant) forms of dystonia
- Segmental, hemi-, multifocal or generalized dystonia
- Patients who underwent neurosurgery
- Inability to understand written and spoken Dutch language
- Patients treated with the Bleton method by their physiotherapist at the moment of inclusion
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL38134.018.12 |