The primary objective of this study is to examine user acceptance after technology-supported arm/hand training using the active-actuated orthosis at home by chronic stroke patients. Secondary objectives are to examine whether stroke patients…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Central nervous system vascular disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Main study parameters are outcomes related to user acceptance, including
usability, satisfaction, motivation and compliance (Training duration,
Intrinsic Motivation Inventory, System Usability Scale, and a semi-structured
interview about user experience).
Secondary outcome
Measures to examine general motor function, perceived use and participation
(The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), the upper extremity part of the
Fugl-Meyer (FM) test, Motor Activity Log (MAL), the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS),
adapted Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT) and kinematics).
Background summary
After experiencing a stroke, the majority of people have to cope with impaired
arm and hand function. Post-stroke rehabilitation training aims to regain arm
and hand motor function, which is essential to perform most activities of daily
living (ADL) independently. To stimulate restoration of arm function after
stroke, intensive, task-specific training with active contribution of the
patient is essential. The application of robotics in rehabilitation to promote
this repetitive training is promising. Most research involving robotics so far
has demonstrated significant improvement in upper limb motor function by
participants, but limited studies have showed improvements in ADL. In the
SCRIPT2 project we are developing robotic technologies for home rehabilitation
to enable self-administration of more intense and more frequent exercises,
specifically of the hand and wrist with the goal of contributing to the
personal independence of stroke patients.
Study objective
The primary objective of this study is to examine user acceptance after
technology-supported arm/hand training using the active-actuated orthosis at
home by chronic stroke patients. Secondary objectives are to examine whether
stroke patients increase their total amount of practice when provided with the
opportunity, examine if (additional) training enhances changes in arm/hand
function and to explore which factors contribute to this. In addition, we will
examine differences in orthotic effect between passive and active versions of
arm/hand support on movement performance and motor control.
Study design
This explorative feasibility study has a longitudinal design. Evaluation is
based on one baseline measurement pre-training, and one evaluation measurements
within one week post training.
Intervention
Subjects will be recommended to exercise 180 minutes per week (6 days, 30
minutes/day) with the SCRIPT2 system at home, during 6 weeks. They will train
their arm and hand using games via the patient user interface, while wearing an
active-actuated orthosis which supports wrist extension and hand opening, and
wearing the SaeboMAS for gravity compensation of the proximal arm. During the
six weeks of training, they will be remotely supervised, off-line, by a
therapist.
Study burden and risks
Participation in this study can provide an immediate benefit for the subject,
in providing the opportunity for additional, self directed rehabilitation of
the affected arm and hand. The extent of this benefit cannot be predicted,
obtaining these insights is one of the purposes of this study.
The risks for the subjects are minimum, since the movement tasks consist of
functional and familiar arm and hand movements and are performed within the
ability of the subject, while he/she is seated. During training, subjects will
wear the SCRIPT2 active-actuated orthosis. This is an exoskeleton which
interacts with the human body by providing forces to the wrist and hand through
springs in series with small servo motors in a series-elastic actuation (SEA)
configuration. The joint torque is controlled and limited to prevent excessive,
forced movements. The device has several safety stops and it can only operate
within safe movement and force range for the individual user. The amount of
support can be adjusted to provide more or less offset force to wrist or finger
extension. The available power in the actuator is limited, it can produce at
most 0.3Nm, which is not sufficient to cause severe injuries. Besides, patients
are not able to change the amount of support by themselves. The torque will
only be adjusted by an experienced HCP over rehabilitation sessions, based on
the patient*s progress as monitored by the system and observed during weekly
home visits.
The recommended training sessions will be spread throughout the week to
minimise the burden for the subjects. Besides, the subjects will be monitored
by a HCP for signs of overloading. In addition, the outcome measurements used
in this study during the evaluation measurements (movement analysis, functional
scales) are all non-invasive and involve no risk for the subjects.
Roessinghsbleekweg 33b
Enschede 7522 AH
NL
Roessinghsbleekweg 33b
Enschede 7522 AH
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with an unilateral ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke, between 6 months and 5 years post-stroke
* Between 18 and 80 years of age
* Clinically diagnosed with central paresis of the arm and/or hand as a result of stroke, but with:
- 15° active elbow flexion
- * range of active finger movement (PIP/DIP)
* Ability to complete measurements and training sessions
* Discharged from medical centre
* Living at home and have internet access
* Having a carer who is co-resident or closely involved in their care
* A fair cognitive level: ability to read and understand the Dutch language, and ability to understand and follow instructions
* Patients should fit the device: 5-95% size of hand and body shape
* Written informed consent to participate in the study
Exclusion criteria
* Patients who are not eligible to join normal rehabilitation (psychological issues, patients with near complete paralysis etc.)
* Other severe co-morbidities, like cardiovascular, neurological, orthopaedic or rheumatoid impairments (incl. pain affecting use of the upper extremity) before stroke that may interfere with task performance
* Severe sensory deficits from the involved limb
* Severe neglect
* Visual impairments (that cannot be corrected with glasses or contact lenses to within normal or near normal limits)
* Cognitive impairments
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL47904.044.14 |
Other | Volgt na toestemming METC |