The main goal of the trial is to establish whether laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is superior to conventional open incisional hernia repair in terms of cost-effectiveness. This is measured through length of hospital stay and quality of life.…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Skin and subcutaneous tissue therapeutic procedures
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Primary outcomes are:
-Length of hospital stay
-Quality of life measures through SF-36 and CCS.
Secondary outcome
Secondary endpoints are:
- Time to full recovery within a three months period.
-Re-operation rate for recurrence or complications of the incisional hernia
repair. The analysis will be continued after the cost-effectiveness study has
ended, a longer follow-up is needed to examine the recurrence-rate.
-28 days post surgery morbidity and mortality,
-Shape of the abdomen: a digital photograph of the abdomen using
raster-stereography will be taken pre- and post-operatively to analyse the
change in the abdominal shape.
-Total mean costs will be related to the following effect measures in the
cost-effectiveness analyses:
1) Time to full recovery
2) Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) based on the SF-36.
Background summary
OBJECTIVE: Annually approximately 100.000 patients undergo a laparotomy in the
Netherlands. About 15,000 of these patients will develop an incisional hernia.
Both open and laparoscopic surgical repair have been proven to be safe.
However, the most effective treatment of incisional hernias remains unclear.
This study, the 'INCH-trial', comparing cost-effectiveness of open and
laparoscopic incisional hernia repair, is therefore needed.
STUDY DESIGN: A randomized multi-center clinical trial comparing
cost-effectiveness of open and laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias.
STUDY POPULATION: Patients with a symptomatic incisional hernia, eligible for
laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair.
INTERVENTION: Only surgeons, experienced in both open and laparoscopic
incisional hernia repair, will participate in the INCH trial. Patients are
randomized for either open or laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. In both
surgical techniques, a mesh is placed under or on top of the fascia, with a
minimal overlap of 5 cm.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary endpoint is length of hospital stay after an
incisional hernia repair. Secondary endpoints are time to full recovery within
three months after index surgery, post-operative complications, costs,
recurrences, mortality and quality of life.
SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION/ DATA ANALYSIS: Our hypothesis is that laparoscopic
incisional hernia repair comes with a significant shorter hospital stay
compared to open incisional hernia repair. A difference of 2< days is
considered significant. One-hunderd-and-thirty-five patients are needed in each
treatment arm. Because of an expected loss to follow-up, 300 patientes will be
included.
ECONOMIC EVALUATION: The economic evaluation will be performed from a societal
perspective. Primary outcomes are costs per patient related to time-to-recovery
and quality of life.
TIME SCHEDULE: For the INCH trial 2 months of study preparation are needed.
Next, 28 months are needed for accrual of a total of 300 patients (150 per
arm). This period is followed by 3 months of follow-up and 3 months of data
analysis and reporting.
Study objective
The main goal of the trial is to establish whether laparoscopic incisional
hernia repair is superior to conventional open incisional hernia repair in
terms of cost-effectiveness. This is measured through length of hospital stay
and quality of life. Secondary endpoints are re-operation-rate (due to
complications or recurrence), morbidity, mortality and shape of the abdomen.
Study design
Patients who fit the inclusion criteria and have an incisional hernia will be
randomized using a computer generated randomization list which can be accessed
electronically. Stratification will be by centre and by primary or recurrent
incisional hernia. This trial is based on a superiority principle.
Intervention
Patients will either undergo laparoscopic or open incisional hernia repair.
There two groups will be compared.
Study burden and risks
Apart for the normal surgical risks, no extra risks comes with consenting to
this trial. The extra burdens are completing a diary for a few weeks, and some
questionnaires when visiting the out-patient clinics.
De Boelelaan 1117
Amsterdam 1081 HV
NL
De Boelelaan 1117
Amsterdam 1081 HV
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Patients who:
- have an incisional hernia
- the need/wish for surgical repair
- laparoscopic repair is feasible
gave informed consent
Exclusion criteria
Patients who:
- Are pregnant
- Have an ostomy
- Are younger than 18 years old
have an open abdomen treatment in the medical history.
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL34308.029.10 |