This study assesses the effect of oral iron supplementation on gut-derived plasma uremic toxin levels in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and with iron deficiency. The main research questions to be answered are:1. Does oral iron…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Iron and trace metal metabolism disorders
- Renal disorders (excl nephropathies)
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Blood uremic toxin levels (13 uremic toxins: hippurate, indoles (indoxyl
sulfate, indoxyl glucuronide and indole-3-acetic acid, tryptophan metabolites
(kynurenine, kynureninic acid and quinolinic acid), phenols (phenyl acetic
acid, phenyl sulphate, phenyl glucuronide,
3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropionic acid (CMPF), p-cresyl sulfate and
p-cresyl glucuronide), before, during, and after iron treatment.
Secondary outcome
• Faecal uremic toxin levels (13 uremic toxins; see above), before, during, and
after iron treatment
• Gut microbiome composition, before, during, and after iron treatment
• Gut microbial proteolytic activity by faecal ammonia, before, during, and
after iron treatment
• Blood ammonia levels, before, during, and after iron treatment
• Faecal iron content (for correlation with the gut microbiome composition)
• Other blood parameters: Hb (hemoglobin), MCV (Mean Corpuscular Volume), Fe,
TIBC (Total iron binding capacity), ferritin, CRP (C-reactive protein),
creatinine (estimation GFR).
o The transferrin saturation will be calculated based on TIBC and Fe.
Background summary
There is a high prevalence of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease
(CKD), as a result of chronic inflammation. To correct anemia, patients are
often treated with iron, given orally or parenterally. Our previous experiments
in a kinetic model of the human large intestine have shown that the provision
of iron to a human gut microbiota changed its composition and increased protein
fermentation, which resulted in a more toxic microbial metabolome. Furthermore,
we recently investigated the influence of protein intake on plasma uremic toxin
levels in healthy volunteers who were randomized to either a high protein diet
or a low protein diet for 2 weeks. In the high protein diet, we observed a
significant increase in plasma levels of indoxyl sulfate as well as significant
increases in the urinary excretion of indoxyl sulfate, indoxyl glucuronide,
kynurenic acid, quinolinic acid and p-cresyl sulfate. Comparable results were
obtained in a rodent study. Together, this raises the question whether the
administration of iron to patients with CKD contributes to gut microbial
protein fermentation and increased production of uremic toxins. Although it is
not yet fully clear whether uremic toxins are involved in the pathways leading
to progression of CKD, p-cresol and indole derivates (the most studied uremic
toxins) have been associated with mortality, cardiovascular disease and
progression of CKD.
We hypothesize that oral iron supplementation in iron deficient predialysis CKD
patients changes gut microbiome composition, and causes an increase in faecal
and plasma uremic toxin levels, due to stimulation of the proteolytic activity
of the gut microbiota.
Study objective
This study assesses the effect of oral iron supplementation on gut-derived
plasma uremic toxin levels in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and
with iron deficiency. The main research questions to be answered are:
1. Does oral iron supplementation cause an increase of uremic toxin levels in
the faeces and plasma of predialysis CKD patients?
2. Does oral iron supplementation stimulate gut microbial protein fermentation
in predialysis CKD patients?
3. What is the effect of oral iron supplementation on the composition of the
gut microbiome of predialysis CKD patients?
4. Does the gut microbiome recover from the iron intervention and does it
change back to the situation before intervention?
Study design
Longitudinal study
Study burden and risks
With regarding to treatment with ferrous fumarate there are no extra risks
associated with participation in this study, as this a therapy is a standard
regimen for iron deficient predialysis CKD patients. To be complete we here
mention the adverse effects related to this therapy: mild constipation (1-10%),
diarrhoea (0.1-1%) and allergic skin responses (rash, urticaria, itch,
erythema, photosensibilisation) (0.01-0.1%). Other events that have been
recorded are nausea, aching stomach, vomiting, anorexia, black colouring of the
stools (Farmacotherapeutisch kompas; accessed online on 6-11-2014).
Participation in this study involves the withdrawal of 8 extra blood samples
(3-6 mL) over the course of 4 months. It also involves in-home collection (and
short-term storage) of faeces at 9 time points, and the completion of a simple
food questionnaire at the same time points. Patients from the region of the
city of Nijmegen will be included, it is therefore possible to visit the
patient at home to collect blood samples and the faecal samples. This reduces
the number of site visits by the patient. The risks and burden for the patients
can therefore be considered as minimal. To answer our research questions
predialysis CKD patients is the most related group, as this group is most
vulnerable for an increase in circulating uremic toxins that will not be
efficiently cleared by the kidneys.
Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 22
Nijmegen 6525GA
NL
Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 22
Nijmegen 6525GA
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
1. Age range: 18-80 years
2. CKD stage III-IV (GFR of 15-60 ml/min /1.73m2)
3. Iron deficient and an indication for treatment with ferrous fumarate, that is Hb < 7 mmol/L, TSAT (transferrin saturation) <20% and ferritin < 200 µg/l, in the presence of a CRP < 10 mg/L).
4. Living in the region of Nijmegen, that is within 20 km from Radboudumc
Exclusion criteria
1. Patients already under treatment with iron (orally or intravenously), or finished iron treatment <= 4 weeks before start of the trial.
2. Patients using over the counter iron supplements / iron fortified products
3. Constipation (defecation less than 3 times a week).
4. Treatment with antibiotics <= 4 weeks before start the trial. If antibiotic treatment is required during the trial, patients are excluded from the trial.
5. Start of Sevelamer treatment during the trial (patients already on Sevelamer treatment and which is continued do not have to be excluded).
6. Hb < 4.5
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL51531.091.14 |