The objective of this proposal is to investigate if duloxetine is effective as a third choice pain medication for treating chronic pain in OA compared to usual care. Furthermore, we will assess the cost-effectiveness of duloxetine treatment and if…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Joint disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary outcome of this study will be pain at 3 months measured with the
WOMAC pain subscale.
Secondary outcome
Secondary outcomes will be pain at one year (WOMAC pain subscale), disability
(WOMAC function subscale), adverse reactions, quality of life, compliance to
treatment, patients*satisfaction, OARSI-OMERACT, co-interventions, costs (iMCQ,
iPCQ).
Background summary
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent chronic condition of the
musculoskeletal system. In the Dutch population it is the single largest
contributing factor to decreased physical wellbeing. The vast majority of
patients suffering from OA are treated in a primary care setting. The general
practitioner (GP) plays a key role in the treatment of pain, the most
debilitating symptom of this condition. Currently, usual care by GPs consists
of education, exercise training and pain medication in the form of paracetamol,
NSAIDs or opioids. Thus far, however, the effectiveness of symptomatic
treatment has proven to be limited. Improved analgesic treatment is therefore
needed, especially since there are no treatment options available aimed at
delaying or halting progression of the disease, with the exception of surgical
joint-replacement, an intervention which is not only costly but also of limited
durability.
Until now, the effectiveness of analgesia in OA has only been studied for the
total population of OA patients. However, there are strong indications of
specific subgroups, especially with regard to pain symptomatology. Pain in OA
consists of nociceptive pain in the joint itself, peripheral sensitized pain
from locally generated inflammatory factors, and centrally sensitized pain.
Central sensitization, sometimes called neuropathic pain, leads to
hypersensitivity to pain. Inhibition of descending input from the brain stem
operates through norepinephrine and serotonin. Disinhibition of this descending
input contributes to central sensitization. This type of pain, or sensitized
pain mechanism, is present in a large percentage of OA patients with chronic
pain (37%) and is probably responding particularly poorly to currently
available analgesia, as it requires medication with a centrally acting effect.
A common given analgesic for non-OA neuropathic pain is amitriptyline in the
Netherlands. However, there are no randomized placebo controlled trials about
the efficacy of amitriptyline for chronic pain in knee or hip OA. Moreover, in
the most recent guidelines of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International
(OARSI) for non-surgical management of knee OA, duloxetine is recommended for
individuals. Duloxetine is traditionally an antidepressant, which in the
Netherlands is also indicated for the treatment of diabetic peripheral
neuropathy. Duloxetine and amitriptyline belong to a different medication
group. Duloxetine is a serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) and
the mechanism is that it strengthens the inhibition of the descending input,
while amitriptyline is a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) of which the actual
mechanism is not completely clear; hypothesized is that it inhibits the
reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine, but less selectively than a SNRI.
Several randomized placebo-controlled trials have now demonstrated the efficacy
of low dose duloxetine versus placebo in the treatment of pain in OA
(clinically relevant effect sizes of 0.5 for pain of OA9, 0.6 for disability of
OA9, and 0.4 for average pain of OA). These trials are short-term (10-16 weeks)
randomized placebo-controlled trials in a highly controlled and secondary care
settings. Not known is the effectiveness of duloxetine as third choice
analgesia in a pragmatic and primary care setting. Neither is clear whether the
efficacy of duloxetine is predominantly found in those patients suffering from
neuropathic pain, or whether duloxetine as third choice analgesia in primary
care is cost-effective. Measurement of neuropathic pain traditionally required
sophisticated quantitative measurements not suited for use in clinical
practice. However, a simple questionnaire modified for OA (modified painDETECT)
which can be applied in a GP setting, has recently been demonstrated to
correspond well with such traditional, more extensive measurements. Knees with
higher modified painDETECT scores (>12.0) had higher odds of having signs of
central sensitization.5
Currently, besides education, lifestyle advice, physiotherapy and dietary
therapy, the usual care of the GP follows a stepped approach when prescribing
analgesics in patients chronic OA pain. Paracetamol is the first treatment
option, as it is relatively safe and has few contraindications. If the
analgesic effect of paracetamol proves to be insufficient, GPs have the option
of prescribing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and subsequently
tramadol or other opioids. However, these medications are often
contraindicated, particularly in elderly patients, and they are associated with
the occurrence of serious adverse reactions. The availability of a well
indicated, effective and relatively safe medicine, to be used when current
analgesic options fail, would help improve the quality of life in these chronic
pain patients and would allow GPs to deliver better and more targeted care. In
the long term, this could potentially help postpone the need for a
joint-replacement and revision surgery, whilst retaining quality of life.
Study objective
The objective of this proposal is to investigate if duloxetine is effective as
a third choice pain medication for treating chronic pain in OA compared to
usual care. Furthermore, we will assess the cost-effectiveness of duloxetine
treatment and if the presence of neuropathic pain component favorably modifies
the response to treatment and if the presence of neuropathic pain will be
necessary for (cost-)effectiveness.
Study design
Open-labeled cluster randomized controlled trial with a follow up period of one
year, in which general practices are randomized to either prescribing
duloxetine and providing usual care versus providing usual care only.
Intervention
Patients in the intervention group will be treated with duloxetine 1dd60mg and
usual care during one year. The patients in the control group will be treated
with usual care which consists of analgesics, education, lifestyle advice,
physiotherapy and dietary therapy.
Study burden and risks
Patients receiving duloxetine may benefit from the analgesic effect of
duloxetine. Patients in the intervention arm may experience side-effects.
Duloxetine is a registered drug in the Netherlands. Side-effects are well
known. In addition, in studies with duloxetine in OA patients no unexpected
side-effects occurred.
The control group receives usual care according to the guidelines; there is no
additional burden associated with this.
In addition, patients in both groups have to answer questionnaires at baseline,
3, 6, 9 and 12 months.
Wytemaweg 80
Rotterdam 3015 CN
NL
Wytemaweg 80
Rotterdam 3015 CN
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
1) having hip or knee OA based on the clinical ACR criteria, and 2) having chronic pain (most days of the last three months) in hip or knee, and 3) either: (i) a contra-indication for NSAIDs; (ii) adverse reactions of NSAIDs; or (iii) insufficient benefit of NSAIDs.
Exclusion criteria
1) on waiting list for hip/knee replacement, and 2) use of antidepressants, 3) contra-indication of duloxetine (use of Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors, having uncontrolled narrow-angle glaucoma, in combination with (other) central nervous system acting drugs, in combination with thioridazine, hypersensitivity to duloxetine, disturbed liverfunction, renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance <30)).
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
Other | 19506 |
EudraCT | EUCTR2014-003919-11-NL |
CCMO | NL50590.078.15 |