To define the exact effect of LSG with and without concomitant HH repair on the prevalence of GERD and GERD-related symptoms in obese patients who are intraoperatively diagnosed with a small HH. Furthermore, to examine the effect of LSG on theā¦
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Gastrointestinal therapeutic procedures
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Primary endpoint is the differences in total esophageal acid exposure between
patients (diagnosed with small HH) who underwent either LSG alone or LSG+HHR.
Secondary outcome
Secondary endpoints consist of 1) changes in prevalence and intensity of GERD
symptoms, dysphagia symptoms, and quality of life based on validated
questionnaires between these two groups, 2) changes in belching, the number of
acid and weakly acidic reflux episodes and manometric changes, 3) the effect of
LSG on total esophageal acid exposure, weakly acid exposure and manometric
changes in patients with no intraoperatively diagnosed HH who underwent LSG
alone and (4) changes in anti-reflux medication usage in both groups of
patients within the HH-group and patients in the no-HH-group.
Background summary
Bariatric surgery is considered a safe and effective treatment for (morbid)
obesity. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common among obese patients,
both before and after bariatric surgery. It is well accepted that Laparoscopic
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) leads to a decrease in postoperative GERD.
Despite the fact that the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is increasingly
popular worldwide, and gradually starts to be more frequently performed than
LRYGB, it still remains unclear what the exact effect of LSG on the
postoperative prevalence of GERD and the development of denovo GERD is. The
presence of a (small) hiatal hernia (HH) is believed to be a risk factor for
GERD following LSG. However, there is a lack of clear cut guidelines and
clinical trials / prospective studies comparing LSG with and without combined
repair of small hiatal hernias, and the effect of both treatments on
postoperative GERD symptoms and esophageal acid exposure.
Study objective
To define the exact effect of LSG with and without concomitant HH repair on the
prevalence of GERD and GERD-related symptoms in obese patients who are
intraoperatively diagnosed with a small HH. Furthermore, to examine the effect
of LSG on the postoperative prevalence of GERD and related symptoms in obese
patients without a HH.
Study design
Prospective blinded randomized controlled clinical trial comparing LSG alone
with LSG+HH repair in obese patients with a small HH.
Intervention
All 80 patients will undergo an additional pre-operative and three and 12
months postoperative combined pH-impedance and high-resolution manometry (HRM)
examination in addition to the standard pre-and postoperative care for patients
undergoing LSG. Furthermore, all patients will be asked to complete a pre- and
postoperative questionnaire at three and 12 months following surgery concerning
reflux symptoms, dysphagia, and quality of life. Patients with an
intraoperatively diagnosed fingerprint indentation of the diaphragm, a small
dimple surrounding the point where the esophagus passes through the diaphragm
and known to possible indicate the presence of a HH, and with the HH measuring
< 5cm following exploration, are intra-operatively being randomized for either
LSG alone or LSG with concomitant HH repair. For those patients randomized for
HH repair, dissection and reduction of the hernia sac will be performed
followed by posterior crural closure using non-absorbable sutures. Additional
anterior sutures are used if deemed necessary.
Study burden and risks
Included patients will undergo a 24 hours combined pH-impedance monitoring and
HRM prior to and three months and one year following surgery, next to the
standard pre-operative workup for bariatric surgery. Both HRM and 24-hour
combined pH-impedance monitoring are safe procedures without any medical risks.
The procedure consists of nasal introduction of a flexible catheter into the
esophagus. Potential burdens include the gag-reflex during the placement of the
catheter for combined pH-impedance monitoring and HRM. Questionnaires focussing
on GERD-symptoms, dysphagia and quality of life will be filled in
pre-operatively and three and 12 months following surgery, which will take
approximately 15 minutes in total. During surgery, the presence of a small HH
(<5 cm) will be assessed, after which the patient will be randomized for either
LSG with concomitant HHR or LSG alone. Additional HH repair will take less than
10 minutes and the medical risks consist of bleeding of one of the hiatal
pillars and/or postoperative dysphagia.
Koekoekslaan 1
Nieuwegein 3430VB
NL
Koekoekslaan 1
Nieuwegein 3430VB
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
- Age 18-65 years
- Body Mass Index (BMI) of *40 or *35 with significant comorbidity, with an indication for LSG
- Fit for surgery
Exclusion criteria
- Age <18 and >65 years
- No informed consent
- History of GERD, reflux esophagitis or Barrett*s esophagus
- History of, or intraoperatively diagnosed, paraesophageal hernia (type II) or mixed (type III), or hiatal hernia > 5,0 cm
- Previous anti-reflux surgery, HH repair or previous bariatric surgery
- Pregnant
- Severe esophageal motility disorders
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL55381.100.15 |