The study is designed to clinically demonstrate device acute safety (Primary Endpoint) along with longer FU device safety and effectiveness evaluation (Secondary Endpoint).The main objectives of the study areU :1) Evaluate the Acute safety of theā¦
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Cardiac valve disorders
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Primary endpoints:
* Primary safety endpoint: Acute Safety. Rate of device related SAE including
device related mortality, stroke, MI, cardiac tamponade, surgery for failed
percutaneous repair and non-elective cardiovascular surgery to treat an adverse
event. At discharge and 30 days.
Secondary outcome
Secondary endpoints:
* Secondary safety endpoint: Safety at 3 and 6 months. Rate of device related
SAE at 3 and 6 months.
* Secondary effectiveness endpoint: MR reduction post-procedure, at discharge,
30 days, 3 and 6 months.
* Improved NYHA class and 6MWT distance at 30 days, 3 and 6 months.
Background summary
Mitral Regurgitation (MR) is the most common valvular pathology affecting
several million people in Europe alone. The symptoms associated with MR are
congestive heart failure as well as symptoms suggestive of a low cardiac output
state. Available medical therapy is suboptimal and for most symptomatic
patients surgical intervention is the therapy of choice. Current guidelines
usually recommend surgical repair over replacement, due to more favorable
outcomes when the native valve is preserved.
The morbidity and mortality of surgical approaches have led to development of
less invasive method to treating MR. Considerable segment of the patients
suffering from severe functional MR (grade *3+) with impaired left ventricular
function are considered at high risk for surgery and therefore percutaneous
solution should be considered.
Study objective
The study is designed to clinically demonstrate device acute safety (Primary
Endpoint) along with longer FU device safety and effectiveness evaluation
(Secondary Endpoint).
The main objectives of the study areU :
1) Evaluate the Acute safety of the implanted Mistral device post procedure and
at 30 day follow up period.
2)Evaluate the long term Safety of the device (3 and 6 months follow up).
3)Demonstrate effectiveness of the Mistral device in improving MR.
Study design
Study describes a prospective, multicenter, single arm, uncontrolled,
non-randomized, enrolling patients with moderate-severe functional MR who are
at high risk for surgery, and in whom existing co-morbidities would not
preclude the expected benefit from correction of the mitral regurgitation.
Intervention
Access:
* Trans-septal (TS) access is performed through the femoral vein.
* TS puncture is performed in accordance with IFU.
* Agilis guiding introducer inserted into the left atrium (LA).
* The Mistral Delivery System (MDS) is inserted through the Agilis into
LA.
Implantation Procedure:
* Positioning of the MDS tip and deployment of the spiral in the LA is
performed under echocardiography and fluoroscopy.
* The MDS with the deployed Mistral are steered and forwarded across the
mitral valve into the LV.
* The Mistral is located at required position: Above one of the papillary
muscles, and between the papillary muscle end and the leaflets tips.
* After positioning the Mistral is rotated, up to maximum of 3.5
rotations, for chordae grasping under echo guidance.
* During positioning and rotations Mistral may be rotated backwards, as
required.
* After assessment of device position, chordae grasping quality and
mitral regurgitation improvement * the device is released from MDS.
* MDS is retrieved out of the body.
* Patient is prepared for ending the procedure.
Study burden and risks
The risks involved in participation in the study are standard risks associated
with general anesthesia, echocardiography examination, use of radiographic
contrast, cardiac catheterization and procedural medications along with the
risks related to the implant device and the delivery system.
The possible additional risks of going through the procedure are as follows:
1. Allergic reaction (nickel- titanium alloy, Stainless steel, ABS plastic)
2. Aneurysm or pseudo-aneurysm
3. Arrhythmias
4. Atrial septal defect requiring intervention
5. Arterio-venous fistula
6. Bleeding
7. Cardiac perforation
8. Cardiac temponade/Pericardial Effusion
9. Coagulopathy
10. Conversion to standard valve surgery
11. Death
12. Dislodgement of previously implanted devices
13. Drug reaction to anti-platelet/anticoagulation agents/contrast media
14. Emboli (air, thrombus, Mistral Implant)
15. Emergency cardiac surgery
16. Endocarditis
17. Failure to retrieve Mistral System components
18. Hemolysis
19. MDS component(s) embolization
20. Mesenteric ischemia
21. Mistral migration or malposition
22. Mistral Device thrombosis
23. Mitral stenosis
24. Mitral valve injury
25. Prolonged angina
26. Prolonged ventilation
27. Pulmonary congestion
28. Pulmonary thrombi-embolism
29. Septicemia
30. Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA)
31. Vessel perforation or laceration
32. Worsening heart failure
33. Worsening mitral regurgitation
As with every new product new and to date unknown side effects may occur during
the treatment with Mistral.
1 HaMada St. .
Rehovot 76703
IL
1 HaMada St. .
Rehovot 76703
IL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Subject has given signed study Informed Consent for participation prior to procedure.
* Subject is * 18 years of age or legal age in host country
* Subject is willing and able to comply with all required follow-up evaluations
* Genders eligible for the study: Both genders
* Subject has functional MR of grade 3+ or more
* Subject has left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >20 % and < 40%.
* No contraindications to trans-septal puncture
* Subject is of functional class 3 or more (NYHA)
- The subject is high risk to undergo MV surgery as assessed and consented by a cardiac surgeon and an intervention cardiologist at the site (center heart team), and according to ESC/EACTS guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (including minimum STS score>4%) or subject voluntarily and consciously refuses surgery
* Subject is excluded from other standard of care procedures as determined by center heart team.
* Patients with femoral veins enabling catheterization with 12Fr catheters
* Life expectancy * 1 year
Exclusion criteria
* Mitral Stenosis * moderate
* Aortic Stenosis/Insufficiency > moderate
* Subvalvular calcification or calcification of the chordae.
* Subject has a prosthesis valve in the mitral/aortic position
* Subject has a history of a cerebral vascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the past 3 months.
* Subject has a history of a myocardial infarction (MI) in the past 3 months
* Subject refuses blood transfusion or surgical valve replacement.
* Subject has had a percutaneous interventional or other invasive cardiac or peripheral procedure * 7 days of the index procedure
* Subject has a history of, or has active endocarditis
* Subject has echocardiographic evidence of intra-cardiac mass, thrombus, vegetation or soft-mobile deposits
* Subject is in acute pulmonary edema.
* Subject has hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic or mechanical support.
* Subject has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication
* Subject has renal insufficiency as evidenced by a serum Creatinine > 3.0mg/dL.
* Subject has ongoing infection or sepsis
* Subject has blood dyscrasias (leukopenia, acute anemia, thrombocytopenia, history of bleeding diathesis, or coagulopathy)
* Subject has an active peptic ulcer or has had gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within the past 3 months prior to the index procedure
* Subject requires emergency surgery for any reason
* Subject has a known allergy to Nitinol alloys, 316L\304 stainless steel.
* Pregnant or lactating women.
* Patients being dependent upon the sponsor or upon the investigator or upon the investigational site.
* Subject has a known contrast media allergy
* Presence of high degree atrio-ventricular block (2nd or 3rd degree A-V block), or the presence of tri-fascicular block
* According to investigator on site the patient is suffering from a severe end stage disease (e.g. malignancy, severe pulmonary disease, liver disease, renal failure) and has a life expectancy of less than 1 year.
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL52684.041.15 |