The purpose of this study is to improve the prediction of RD episode in patients undergoing opioid therapy in the hospital ward (also known as the General Care Floor) to guide clinicians and nursing staff in selecting the at-risk patients who could…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Respiratory disorders NEC
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary endpoint used to derive the score will be the occurrence of RD
episodes resulting by C20p device memory data combined with clinical data and
validated by an independent Clinical Endpoint Committee (CEC) during the study
course. A RD episode is defined by whichever event is reached first during the
monitoring phase:
* RR * 8 breaths for * 3 minutes.
Or
* SpO2 * 85% for * 3 minutes.
Or
* EtCO2 * 60 mmHg for * 3 minutes.
Or
* Apnea episode lasting > 30 seconds
Or
* Any invasive intervention taken from clinical staff to prevent a potential or
to treat a respiratory Opioid-Related Adverse Events (ORADE).
Secondary outcome
1 RD risk patients versus no-risk patients will be compared in terms of:
* Incidence of both invasive and non-invasive staff interventions (e.g.
physical stimulation of the patient, naloxone administration, positive pressure
ventilation and assistance from a respiratory therapist or a physician, etc.).
* Hospital length of stay, 30 days readmission rate and primary diagnosis upon
readmission.
* Patient mortality at 30 days.
2 The sub-group of non-surgical patients will be described in terms of specific
baseline characteristics, RD occurrence, respiratory ORADE occurrence, etc.
3 Staff satisfaction and patients* satisfaction on the use of capnographic
monitoring will be assessed by NRS 1-10 at the end of the monitoring period.
Appropriateness of alarms will be measured by calculating sensitivity and
specificity based on received operator*s reaction.
4 Respiratory ORADE will be correlated with ASA value as reported in the
related reports.
5 IPI value*s variations will be correlated with the occurrence of RD and
respiratory ORADE.
6 Abnormal readings/waveform patterns in the first 2.5 hours from monitoring
start will be correlated with RD and ORADE occurrence.
7 EtCO2 variations will be correlated with the occurrence of sepsis.
8 Cost associated to invasive staff interventions will be estimate
retrospectively using standard cost data from different countries.
Background summary
Opioid analgesia is the primary pharmacologic intervention for managing pain in
hospitalized patients. Opioid therapy is indeed the gold standard for treatment
of post-surgical pain in hospital ward but also the majority of non-surgical
patients admitted in hospital are exposed to opioids. They can be administered
orally, by Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA), by epidural or intrathecal
infusions, by intravenous or intramuscular analgesia. In recent years there
have been increasing concerns over unmonitored mortality and morbidity in
patients during opioid therapy for acute pain. Up to 80% of patients who
received opioid analgesics experience Opioid-Related Adverse Drug Events
(ORADEs). In post-surgical patients, ORADEs have been showed to significantly
increase patient*s hospital length of stay and related costs. Improper
patients* monitoring has been reported by the Joint Commission as one of the
main causes of ORADEs.
One of the major opioid side effects includes respiratory depression (RD),
which causes alveolar hypoventilation and hypoxemia. The reported incidence of
RD in post-surgical patients varied from 0.3% to 3.4% only considering
intervention rate (i.e. naxolone infusion), while it is reported up to 21% and
41% when including also prolonged oxygen desaturation and bradypnea episodes,
respectively. If detected early, most cases of opioid-related RD can be treated
with naloxone; however, severe cases can be fatal.
Respiratory Compromise is a state in which there is a high likelihood of
decompensation into respiratory depression, respiratory failure or death, but
in which specific interventions (enhanced monitoring and/or therapies) might
prevent or mitigate decompensation10. Detection of a patient*s Respiratory
Compromise status before progression can help avert unwarranted outcomes and
the possible need for critical care. Despite this, there are no universally
accepted guidelines to direct effective and safe assessment and monitoring
practices for patients receiving in-hospital opioid analgesia1. Current
standard of care for respiratory monitoring of hospital ward patients receiving
opioid therapy is intermittent documentation of oxygen saturation (SpO2) value
(e.g. performed at 4 to 6 hours intervals). Some centers perform continuous
SpO2 monitoring to patients considered at risk to develop RD, but the decision
is usually left to physician discretion. Respiratory rate (RR) is often
determined by clinician assessment though manual respiration counts9.
Typically, only some high-risk patients are monitored by capnography, a
technology that assesses real-time ventilation by continuous measuring of SpO2,
RR and the concentration of exhaled end tidal carbon dioxide (etCO2).
Pulse oximetry alone can lead to inaccurate assessment of patients* condition,
especially when supplemental oxygen is needed: the Anesthesia Patient Safety
Foundation recommended the use of continuous electronic monitoring of
oxygenation and ventilation for all patients undergoing opioid therapy in the
postoperative period and capnography monitoring when supplemental oxygen is
needed. Even at low respiratory rate, SpO2 could be maintained for a certain
period, thus delaying the RD detection. Many patients who breathe inadequately
at rest or during sleep may present normal or near-normal oxygen saturation
after they are awakened.
Growing evidence supports the use of capnography for earlier and more reliable
warnings of RD in postoperative patients in the general ward, compared with
pulse oximetry. It has been demonstrated that RD detected by capnography by
bradypnea is significantly higher than RD detected by oxygen desaturation in
post-surgical patients using PCA6, while there are no data in literature
related to capnography monitoring in non-surgical patients.
Study objective
The purpose of this study is to improve the prediction of RD episode in
patients undergoing opioid therapy in the hospital ward (also known as the
General Care Floor) to guide clinicians and nursing staff in selecting the
at-risk patients who could more benefit from capnographic monitoring by:
- Deriving a score risk assessment tool in a derivation cohort;
- Evaluating the prognostic value of the score for the prediction of RD in an
internal validation cohort.
Study design
PRODIGY is a prospective, multi-center, post-market interventional,
international cohort study. The study will include consecutively enrolled
patients
Intervention
NVT
Study burden and risks
Patients will be monitored during at least 24 hours by capnography and pulse
oxyon sensors. this is a common method
Endepolsdomein 5
Maastricht 6229 GW
NL
Endepolsdomein 5
Maastricht 6229 GW
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
1. Patients admitted to a hospital ward with an ongoing opioid therapy (for both post-surgical and non-surgical pain) by PCA, by epidural or intrathecal infusions or by intravenous analgesia, started in OR, ER, PACU or ICU less than 4 hours before transition to ward;
OR
Patients starting opioid therapy in the ward for both post-surgical and non-surgical pain therapy, by PCA, by epidural or intrathecal infusions or by intravenous analgesia.
2. Patients with age *18 year old
3. Subject is able and willing to give informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
1. Post-surgical patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA PS) IV or higher.
2. Non-surgical patients not suitable for all range of therapies according to their life expectancy.
3. Ventilated or intubated patients.
4. Bariatric patients (BMI >50).
5. Unconsciousness patients that have undergone emergency surgical procedures.
6. Patients with alcohol or drug abuse history.
7. Subject is employed by Medtronic or by the department of any of the investigators or is a close relative of any of the investigators.
8. Subject is unwilling or unable to comply fully with study procedures (including non-toleration of capnography cannula) due to any disease condition (including neurological or psychological impairment) which can raise doubt about compliance and influencing the study outcome.
9. Legal incapacity or evidence that a subject cannot understand the purpose and risks of the study.
10. Subject is participating in another potentially confounding drug or device clinical study
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
Other | clintrials.gov |
CCMO | NL58496.068.16 |