The study aims to extend current insights into the effectiveness of nudging by examining neural correlates in two specific areas important for choice architecture; the role of social influences, and the role of colour cues in product evaluation and…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Lifestyle issues
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Experimental task 1: The main study parameter is the difference in brain
activation when (1) evaluating packages containing information on popularity or
not, and (2) when indicating purchase intention between conditions.
Experimental task 2: The main study parameter is the difference in brain
activation when evaluating packages containing different colours (signalling
healthiness or attractiveness) combined with tasting.
Secondary outcome
The secondary parameters used in the study are correlations between the
behavioural data (obtained via questionnaires) and the brain data (obtained
during the scan session). This is applicable for both tasks.
Background summary
The current study examines the effectiveness of nudges, defined as subtle
rearrangements of the choice context, to gently suggest food choices. At the
point of choice and/or purchase, extrinsic factors (e.g. package, brand, social
environment) are leading determinants since intrinsic (sensory/nutritional)
factors cannot be evaluated properly at this stage. The visual system (e.g.
used when viewing packaging) is the most important information source/sense for
product evaluation at the buying stage. Here, we focus on these visual,
external cues; popularity and package colour, as potential nudges to influence
product perception and suggest better food choices. A significant portion of
the choices consumers make are influenced by social others. Consumers look at
others for what car to buy, what to wear, and what to buy in the supermarket.
Similarly, packaging has also been shown to influence choice and product
evaluation. At a neural level, such effects have not been extensively studied.
Yet, more insights into the neurophysiological nature of the effects would
enhance the development of strategies aimed to stimulate more healthful
nutrition and lifestyles.
Study objective
The study aims to extend current insights into the effectiveness of nudging by
examining neural correlates in two specific areas important for choice
architecture; the role of social influences, and the role of colour cues in
product evaluation and choices.
The objective of the experiment is (1) to disentangle the pieces of information
consumers take and use from noting popular choices, and (2) to investigate if
packages that signal healthiness or attractiveness (through colour) influences
brain activation when consequently tasting.
Study design
The study consists of an fMRI experiment, comprising two adjacent tasks. First,
participants are asked to evaluate different food products and express their
purchase intention of these products. Products are displayed throughout three
different conditions: a neutral condition, an informational social influence
(ISI) condition and a normative social influence (NSI) condition. Second,
participants will view images of product packages (differing in colour) and
taste sweet dairy drinks. Participants are instructed to (P) pay attention to
an image/package and answer questions (e.g. healthiness and attractiveness
rating) and after this (T) pay attention to an image and consequently tasting
and answering questions while their brain activation is measured using
functional MRI.
Study burden and risks
The study is non-therapeutic to the participants. No immediate benefits for the
participants are expected from participation in this study. The risk associated
with participation is negligible. The participant*s burden is as follows,
regarding time: a screening session and training session (approx. 120 min) to
inform and familiarize participants will be conducted. After this an fMRI scan
session (approx. 100-120) is executed. To undergo an fMRI scan involves:
exposure to loud noise, a moderate amount of physical restraint, as well as
exposure to a strong magnetic field (3 Tesla) of which the participant is
unaware, that is, participants do not *feel* being in a magnetic field. During
the scanning session participants will receive taste stimuli, administered in
liquid form. If the participant is uncomfortable with any aspect of the
procedure the study will be terminated.
Stippeneng 4
Wageningen 6708 WE
NL
Stippeneng 4
Wageningen 6708 WE
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
* Age: 18 - 35 years
* Female
* Dutch
* BMI: 18.5-25 kg/m2
* Healthy (as judged by the participant)
* Right handed
* (Occasional) users of the used product category (dairy drinks)
* Minimum of 5 consumption occurrences a year (e.g. Vifit, Optimel, Breaker).
* Successful completion of the training session (see C1: 8.4.2 Training session)
Exclusion criteria
* Colour-blind
* Having difficulties with tasting, smelling, swallowing or eating
* Weight loss or weight gain of 5 kg or more during two months (preceding the screening session)
* Stomach or bowel diseases
* Diabetes, thyroid disease, kidney disease and other chronical disorders
* Having epilepsy or other neurological disorders
* Having claustrophobia, schizophrenia or another mental illness
* Usage of daily medication other than oral contraceptives, paracetamol or H1-antihistaminergic drugs
* Pregnancy during the last 6 months, having the intention to become pregnant (before the end of the experiment) or lactating
* Smoking on average more than one cigarette/cigar a day
* Being allergic/intolerant for products under study
* Having a history of or current alcohol consumption of on average more than 21 units per week
* Working or doing an internship/thesis at the Department of Human Nutrition (WUR)
* Working or doing an internship/thesis at the Department of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour (WUR)
* Current participation in other (medical) research (except the EetMeetWeet study)
* Having a contra-indication to MRI scanning (including, but not limited to):
* Pacemakers and defibrillators
* Intraorbital or intraocular metallic fragments
* Ferromagnetic implants
* Presence of non-removable piercings
* Having objections against being informed about incidental findings of pathology and against the general physician being informed about incidental findings of pathology (see F1 Inclusion questionnaire)
Design
Recruitment
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL58193.081.16 |
OMON | NL-OMON20259 |